Bibliography

Aleinikoff, Alexander (1988), Updating Statutory Interpretation, 87 Mich. L. Rev. 20.

Alexander, Larry (1985), Pursuing the Good - Indirectly, 95 Ethics 315.

Alexander, Larry (1989), Constrained by Precedent, 63 S.

Alexander, Larry (1990), Of Two Minds about Law and Minds, 88 Mich. L. Rev. 2444.

Alexander, Larry (1991), The Gap, 14 Harv. J. L. and Publ. Pol. 695.

Alexander, Larry (1995), All or Nothing at All? The Intentions of Authorities and the Authority of Intentions, in Andrei Marmor (ed.), Law and Interpretation: Essays in Legal Interpretation, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Alexander, Larry (1996), Precedent, in Dennis Patterson (ed.), A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory, Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

Alexander, Larry (2013), Originalism, The Why and the What, 82 Fordham L. Rev. 539.

Alexander, Larry, and Kenneth Kress (1995), Against Legal Principles, in Andrei Marmor (ed.), Law and Interpretation: Essays in Legal Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Alexander, Larry, and Saikrishna Prakash (2003), Mother, May I? Imposing Mandatory Prospective Rules of Statutory Interpretation, 20 Const. Comment. 97.

Alexander, Larry, and Saikrishna Prakash (2004), Is that English You're Speaking? Why Intention Free Interpretation is an Impossibility, 41 San Diego L. Rev. 967.

Alexander, Larry, and Emily Sherwin (1994), The Deceptive Nature of Rules, 142 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1191.

Alexander, Larry, and Emily Sherwin (2001), The Rule of Rules: Morality, Rules, and the Dilemmas of Law, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Alexander, Larry, and Emily Sherwin (2002), Interpreting Rules: The Nature and Limits of Inchoate Intentions, in Jeffrey Goldsworthy and Tom Campbell (eds), Legal Interpretation in Democratic States, Aldershot: Ashgate.

Alexander, Larry, and Emily Sherwin (2005), Precedent, in Douglas Edlin (ed.),Common Law Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Alexander, Larry, and Emily Sherwin (2008), Demystifying Legal Reasoning, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Alexander, Larry, and Emily Sherwin (forthcoming, 2022), How to Govern Conduct, in Mark McBride and James Penner (eds), New Essays on the Nature of Legal Reasoning, West Sussex: Hart Publishing.

Altman, Andrew (1986), Legal Realism, Critical Legal Studies, and Dworkin, 15 Phil. and Pub. Aff. 205.

Arrow, Kenneth J. (1963), Social Choice and Individual Values (2nd edn.), New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Baker, J. H. (2002), An Introduction to English Legal History (4th edn.), London: Butterworth's Lexis-Nexis.

Bankowski, Zenon, D. Neil MacCormick, and Geoffrey Marshall (1997), Precedent in the United Kingdom, in D. Neil MacCormick and Robert S. Summers (eds), Interpreting Precedents: A Comparative Study, Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing.

Bassham, Gregory (1992), Original Intent and the Constitution, Savage, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

Bickel, Alexander M. (1961), The Supreme Court, i960 Term - Foreword: The Passive Virtues, 75 Harv L. Rev. 40.

Bix, Brian H. (2002), Natural Law: The Modern Tradition, in Jules Coleman and Scott Shapiro (eds), Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law, New York: Oxford University Press.

Blackburn, Simon (1999), Think, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Blackstone, William (1765), 1 Commentaries on the Laws of England, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Booher, Troy L. (2006), Putting Meaning in Its Place: Originalism and Philosophy of Language, 25 Law and Phil. 387.

Bratman, Michael (1987), Intentions, Plans, and Practical Reason, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brewer, Scott (1996), Exemplary Reasoning: Semantics, Pragmatics, and the Rational Force of Legal Argument by Analogy, 109 Harv. L. Rev. 925.

Burke, Edmund (1790), Reflections on the Revolution in France, and on the Proceedings in Certain Societies in London Relative to That Event, in Peter J. Stanlis (ed.), Edmund Burke (1963), Selected Writings and Speeches, Washington, DC: Regnery Gateway.

Burton, Steven (1992), Judging in Good Faith, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Burton, Steven J. (1995), An Introduction to Law and Legal Reasoning, Boston: Little, Brown.

Campbell, Tom D. (1996), The Legal Theory of Ethical Positivism, Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing.

Cardozo, Benjamin N. (1949), The Nature of the Judicial Process, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Chapman, Gretchen B. and Eric J. Johnson (2002), Incorporating the Irrelevant: Anchors in Judgments of Belief and Value, in Thomas Gilovich, Dale Griffin, and Daniel Kahneman (eds), Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Coke, Sir Edward (1628), The First Part of the Institutes of the Law of England, reprinted in Steve Sheppard (ed.) (2003), The Selected Writings of Sir Edward Coke, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

Coke, Sir Edward (1639), The Selective Writings of Sir Edward Coke, Vol II, Steve Sheppard (ed.), Indianapolis: Liberty Fund (2003).

Coleman, Jules (2002), Methodology, in Jules Coleman and Scott Shapiro (eds), Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law, New York: Oxford University Press.

Coons, John E. (1987), Consistency, 75 Cal. L. Rev. 59.

Daniels, Norman (1979), Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance, 76 J. Phil. 256.

Dardis, Anthony (1994), How the Radically Interpreted Make Mistakes, 33 Dialogue 415.

Dember, William N., and Joel S. Warm (1979), The Psychology of Perception (2nd edn.), New York: Holt.

Dworkin, Ronald (1978), Taking Rights Seriously, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Dworkin, Ronald (1986), Law’s Empire, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Eisenberg, Melvin A. (1988), The Nature of the Common Law, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Ellickson, Robert C. (1991), Order without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Epstein, Richard A. (1992), A Common Lawyer Looks at Constitutional Interpretation, 72 Boston U.

Eskridge, William (1987), Dynamic Statutory Interpretation, 135 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1479.

Eskridge, William (1990), Gadamer/Statutory Interpretation, 90 Colum. L. Rev. 609.

Eskridge, William, and Philip Frickey (1990), Statutory Interpretation as Practical Reasoning, 42 Stan. L. Rev. 321.

Finnis, John (2002), Natural Law: The Classical Tradition, in Jules Coleman and Scott Shapiro (eds), Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law, New York: Oxford University Press.

Fish, Stanley (1989), Doing What Comes Naturally, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Fish, Stanley (2005), There Is No Textualist Position, 42 San Diego L. Rev. 629.

Fiss, Owen (1982), Objectivity and Interpretation, 34 Stan. L. Rev. 739.

Fried, Charles (1981), The Artificial Reasoning of the Law, or What Lawyers Know, 60 Tex. L. Rev. 35.

Fuller, Lon L. (1958), Positivism and Fidelity to Law: A Reply to Professor Hart, 71 Harv. L. Rev. 630.

Fuller, L. L., and William R. Perdue Jr. (1946), The Reliance Interest in Contract Damages, 46 Yale L. J. 52.

Fumerton, Richard A. (1990), Reason and Morality: A Defense of the Egocentric Perspective, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Gilovich, Thomas, Dale Griffin, and Daniel Kahneman (2002) (eds), Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Goldman, Alan H. (2006), The Rationality of Complying with Rules: Paradox Resolved, 116 Ethics 453.

Goldsworthy, Jeffrey (1995), Marmor on Meaning, Interpretation, and Legislative Intention, 1 Legal Theory 439.

Greenawalt, Kent (1983), How Empty Is the Idea of Equality?, 83 Colum. L. Rev. 1167 Greenawalt, Kent (1992), Law and Objectivity, New York: Oxford University Press.

Greenawalt, Kent (1997a), From the Bottom Up, 82 Cornell. L. Rev. 994.

Greenawalt, Kent (1997b), The Nature of Rules and the Meaning of Meaning, 72 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1449.

Greenberg, Mark (2011), The Standard Picture and Its Discontents, in Leslie Green and Brian Leiter (eds), I Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Law 39.

Grice, Paul (1991), Studies in the Way of Words, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Guthrie, Chris, and Tracey E. George (2005), The Futility of Appeal: Disciplinary Insights into the ‘Affirmance Effect' on the United States Courts of Appeals, 32 Fla. St. L. Rev. 357.

Guthrie, Chris, Jeffrey J. Rachlinski, and Andrew J. Wistrich (2001), Inside the Judicial Mind, 86 CornellL. Rev. 777.

Haidt, Jonathan (2001), The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment, 4 Psych. Rev. 814.

Hale, Sir Matthew (1713), The History of the Common Law of England, Charles M. Gary (ed.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press (1971).

Hardin, Russell (1992), Rational Choice, in Lawrence C. Becker and Charlotte B. Becker (eds), Encyclopedia of Ethics, Vol. 1, New York: Garland Publishing.

Hart, H. L. A. (1961), The Concept of Law, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Hart, Henry M. Jr., and Albert M. Sacks (1994), The Legal Process: Basic Problems, in William N. Eskridge Jr. and Phillip P. Frickey (eds), The Making and Application of Law, New York: Foundation Press.

Helmholtz, R. H. (1983), Equitable Division and the Law of Finders, 52 Fordham L. Rev. 313.

Henley, Kenneth (1993), Abstract Principles, Mid-Level Principles, and the Rule of Law, 12 L. and Phil. 121.

Hershkoff, Helen (2001), State Courts and the ‘Passive Virtues': Rethinking the Judicial Function, 114 Harv. L. Rev. 1833.

Hirsch, E. D. (1988), Counterfactual Interpretation, in Sanford Levinson and Steven Mailloux (eds), Interpreting Law and Literature: A Hermeneutic Reader, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

Horty, John F. (2004), The Result Model of Precedent, 10 Legal Theory 19.

Horty, John F. (2011), Rules and Reasons in the Theory of Precedent, 17 Legal Theory 1.

Humphrey, John A. (1999), Quine, Kripke's Wittgenstein, and Sceptical Solutions, 37 Southern J. Phil. 43.

Hurd, Heidi M. (1991), Challenging Authority, 100 Yale L. J. 1011.

Hurd, Heidi M.

Hurd, Heidi M. (1999), Moral Combat, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hurley, S. L. (1990), Coherence, Hypothetical Cases, and Precedent, 10 Oxford J. of Legal Stud. 221.

Hyde, Dominic (2005), ‘Sorites Paradox', in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fa112005/entries/soritesparadox/.

Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky (1979), Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk, 47 Econometrica 263.

Kaplow, Louis (1992), Rules Versus Standards: An Economic Analysis, 42 Duke L. J. 557.

Kavka, Gregory S. (1978), Some Paradoxes of Deterrence, 75 J. Phil. 285.

Kavka, Gregory S. (1983), The Toxin Puzzle, 43 Analysis 33.

Kavka, Gregory S. (1995), Why Even Morally Perfect People Would Need Government, 12 Soc. Phil. and Pol’y 1.

Klepper, Howard (1995), Justification and Methodology in Practical Ethics, 26 Metaphilosophy 201.

Knapp, Steven, and Walter Benn Michaels (1992), Intention, Identity, and the Constitution: A Response to David Hoy, in Gregory Leigh (ed.), Legal Hermeneutics: History, Theory, and Practice, Berkeley: University of California Press.

Knapp, Steven, and Walter Benn Michaels (2005), Not a Matter of Interpretation, 42 San Diego L. Rev. 651.

Kress, Kenneth J. (1984), Legal Reasoning and Coherence Theories: Dworkin's Rights Thesis, Retroactivity, and the Linear Order of Decisions, 72 Cal. L. Rev. 369.

Kripke, Saul A. (1982), Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language: An Elementary Exposition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Kronman, Anthony (1995), The Lost Lawyer, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Kuran, Timur, and Cass R. Sunstein (1999), Availability Cascades and Risk Regulation, 51 Stan. L. Rev. 683.

Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson (1981), Metaphors We Live By, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson (1999), Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought, New York: Basic Books.

Lamond, Grant (2005), Do Precedents Create Rules? 11 Legal Theory 1.

Lamond, Grant (forthcoming, 2022), Revisiting the Reasons Account of Precedent, in Mark McBride and James Penner (eds), New Essays on the Nature of Legal Reasoning, West Sussex: Hart Publishing.

Lawson, Gary (1997), On Reading Recipes... and Constitutions, 85 Geo. L. J. 1823.

Laycock, Douglas (2002), Modern American Remedies (3rd edn.), New York: Aspen.

Lee, Win-Chiat (1989), Statutory Interpretation and the Counterfactual Test for Legislative Intention, 8 Law and Phil. 383.

Leiter, Brian (1996), Heidegger and the Theory of Adjudication, 106 Yale L. J. 253. Lessig, Lawrence (1993), Fidelity in Translation, 71 Tex. L. Rev. 1165.

Levenbook, Baum (2000), The Meaning of a Precedent, 6 Legal Theory 185.

Levi, Edward H. (1948), An Introduction to Legal Reasoning, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Levy, Beryl Harold (1960), Realist Jurisprudence and Prospective Overruling, 109 U. Pa. L Rev. J. 1.

Lieberman, David (1989), The Province of Legislation Determined, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Llewellyn, Karl (1960a), The Bramble Bush: On Our Law and Its Study, Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana Publishing.

Llewellyn, Karl N. (1960b), The Common Law Tradition: Deciding Appeals, Boston: Little, Brown.

Manning, John F. (2001), Textualism and the Equity of Statutes, 101 Colum. L. Rev. 1.

Margolis, Howard (1987), Patterns, Thinking, and Cognition: A Theory of Judgment, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Marmor, Andrei (1999), The Separation Thesis and the Limits of Interpretation, 12 Canadian J. L. and Jurisprudence 135.

Marmor, Andrei (2005a), Interpretation and Legal Theory (2nd edn.), Oxford: Hart Publishing.

Marmor, Andrei (2005b), Should Like Cases Be Treated Alike? 11 Legal Theory 33.

McClennan, Edward F. (1997), Pragmatic Rationality and Rules, 20 Phil. and Pub. Aff. 210.

Moore, Michael S. (1987), Precedent, Induction, and Ethical Generalization, in Laurence Goldstein (ed.), Precedent in Law, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Moore, Michael S. (1997), Legal Principles Revisited, 82 Iowa L. Rev. 867.

Munzer, Stephen R. (1985), Realistic Limits on Realist Interpretation, 58 S. Cal. L. Rev. 459.

Penner, James (forthcoming), Working with a Body of Rules: On the Nature of Doctrinal Legal Disagreement in Common Law and Equity, in Mark McBride and James Penner (eds), New Essays on the Nature of Legal Reasoning, West Sussex: Hart Publishing.

Perry, Stephen R. (1987), Judicial Obligation, Precedent, and the Common Law, 7 Oxford J. Legal Stud. 215.

Perry, Stephen R. (1997), Two Models of Legal Principles, 82 Iowa L. Rev. 787.

Peters, Christopher J. (1997), Equality Revisited, 110 Harv. L. Rev. 1210.

Plous, Scott (1993), The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Posner, Richard (1990), The Problems of Jurisprudence, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Posner, Richard A. (2002), How Judges Think, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Posner, Richard A. (2006), Book Review: Reasoning By Analogy, 91 Cornell L. Rev. 761.

Postema, Gerald J. (1982), Coordination and Convention at the Foundation of Law, 11 J. Legal Stud. 165.

Postema, Gerald J. (1991), Positivism, I Presume?... Comments on Schauer's Rules and the Rule of Law, 14 Harv. J. L. and Publ. Pol. 797.

Postema, Gerald J. (2002), Classical Common Law Jurisprudence, Part I, 2 Oxford U. Commonwealth L. J. 155.

Postema, Gerald J. (2003), Classical Common Law Tradition, Part Il, 3 Oxford U. Commonwealth L. J. 1.

Pound, Roscoe (1922), An Introduction to Legal Philosophy, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Pound, Roscoe (1940), Survey of the Conference Problems, in Conference: The Status of the Rule of Judicial Precedent, 14 U. Cinc. L. Rev. 324.

Pound, Roscoe (1960), Law Finding through Experience and Reason, Athens: University of Georgia Press.

Prakash, Saikrishna R. (1998), Unoriginalism's Law without Meaning, 15 Const. Comment. 529.

Priest, George L. (1989), Private Litigants and the Court Congestion Problem, 69 B. U. L. Rev. 527.

Priest, George L., and Benjamin Klein (1984), The Selection of Disputes for Litigation, 13 J. Legal Stud. 1.

Rachlinski, Jeffrey J. (1998), A Positive Psychological Theory of Judging in Hindsight, 65 U. Chi. L. Rev, 571.

Rachlinski, Jeffrey J. (2000), Heuristics and Biases in the Courts: Ignorance and Adaptation, 79 Ore. L. Rev. 61.

Rachlinski, Jeffrey J. (2006), Bottom-Up and Top-Down Decisionmaking, 73 U. Chi. L. Rev. 64.

Rachlinski, Jeffrey J., and Andrew J. Wistrich (2017), Judging the Judiciary by the Numbers: Empirical Research on Judges, 13 Am. Rev. L. and Soc. Sci. 203, online at lawsocisci.annualreview.org.

Rachlinski, Jeffrey J., Andrew J. Wistrich, and Chris Guthrie (2015), Can Judges Make Reliable Numerical Judgments? Distorted Damages and Skewed Settlements, 90 Ind. L. J. 695.

Rawls, John (1951), Outline of a Decision Procedure for Ethics, 60 Phil. Rev. 177.

Rawls, John (1971), A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Raz, Joseph (1979), The Authority of Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Raz, Joseph (1986), The Morality of Freedom, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Raz, Joseph (1996), Ethics in the Public Domain, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Regan, Donald H. (1989), Authority and Value: Reflections on Raz's Morality of Freedom, 62 S. Cal. L. Rev. 995.

Rigoni, Adam (2014), Common-Law Judicial Reasoning and Analogy, 20 Legal Theory 133.

Ripstein, Arthur (1996), Law, Language, and Interpretation, 46 U. Toronto L. J. 335.

Ross, Lee D. (1997), The Intuitive Psychologist and His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process, in Leonard Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, New York: Academic Press.

Samuel, Geoffrey (2018), Rethinking Legal Reasoning, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Sartorius, Rolf E. (1997), Individual Conduct and Social Norms, Encino, CA: Dickinson Publishing Company.

Scalia, Antonin (1997), A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Schauer, Frederick (1988), Formalism, 97 Yale L. J. 509.

Schauer, Frederick (1991a), Playing by the Rules: A Philosophical Examination of Rule­Based Decision-Making in Life and Law, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Schauer, Frederick (1991b), Rules and the Rule of Law, 14 Harv. J. L. and Pub. Pol. 645.

Schauer, Frederick (1995a), Giving Reasons, 47 Stan. L. Rev. 633.

Schauer, Frederick (1995b), Opinions as Rules, 62 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1455.

Schauer, Frederick (1997), Prescriptions in Three Dimensions, 82 Iowa L. Rev. 911.

Schauer, Frederick (2006), Do Cases Make Bad Law? 73 U. Chi. L. Rev. 883.

Schelling, Thomas (1980), The Strategy of Conflict, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Schwarz, Norbert, and Leigh Ann Vaughn (2002), The Availability Heuristic Revisited: Ease of Recall and Content of Recall as Distinct Source of Information, in Thomas Gilovich, Dale Griffin, and Daniel Kahneman (eds), Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Shain, Ralph (1993), Mill, Quine, and Natural Kinds, 24 Metaphilosophy 275.

Shapiro, Scott J. (1998), The Difference That Rules Make, in Brian Bix (ed.), Analyzing Law, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Sharfinan, Keith (2005), Judicial Valuation Behavior: Some Evidence from Bankruptcy, 32 Fla. St. L Rev. 387.

Sherwin, Emily (1999a), A Defense of Analogical Reasoning in Law, 66 U. Chi. L Rev. 1179.

Sherwin, Emily (1999b), Rules and Judicial Review, 6 Legal Theory 299.

Sherwin, Emily (2006), Judges as Rulemakers, 73 U. Chi. L. Rev. 919.

Sherwin, Emily (2018), Exclusionary Rules, in Heidi M. Hurd (ed.), Moral Puzzles and Legal Perplexities: Essays on the Influence of Larry Alexander, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sherwin, Emily (forthcoming), Formalism and Realism in Private Law, in Andrew S. Gold, John C. P. Goldberg, Daniel B. Kelly, Emily Sherwin, and Henry E. Smith (eds), The Oxford Handbook of The New Private Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Simpson, A. W. B. (1961), The Ratio Decidendi of a Case and the Doctrine of Binding Precedent, in A. G. Guest (ed.), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence, London: Oxford University Press.

Simpson, A. W. B. (1973), The Common Law and Legal Theory, in A. W. B. Simpson (ed.) Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence (2nd series), Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Solum, Lawrence B. (2006), Pluralism and Public Legal Reason, 15 William and Mary Bill of Rts. J. 7.

Solum, Lawrence B. (2018), Originalist Theory and Precedent: A Public Meaning Approach, 33 Const. Comment. 451.

Stevens, Katherina (2018), Reasoning By Precedent - Between Rules and Analogies, 24 Legal Theory 216.

Summers, Robert S. (1997), Precedent in the United States (New York), in D. Neil MacCormick and Robert S. Summers (eds), Interpreting Precedents: A Comparative Study, Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing.

Sunstein, Cass R. (1989), Interpreting Statutes in the Regulatory State, 103 Harv. L. Rev. 405.

Sunstein, Cass R. (1996), Legal Reasoning and Political Conflict, New York: Oxford University Press.

Sunstein, Cass R. (1999), One Case at a Time, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Sunstein, Cass R. (2003), What's Available? Social Influences and Behavioral Economics, 97 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1295.

Sunstein, Cass R., Daniel Kahneman, David Schkade, and Ilana Ritov (2002), Predictably Incoherent Judgments, 54 Stan. L. Rev. 1153.

Symposium (1998), 146 U. Pa. L. Rev.

Symposium: The Behavioral Analysis of Legal Institutions: Possibilities, Limitations, and New Directions (2002), 32 Fla. St. L. Rev. 315.

Tan, David (2016), Rules and the Standard Picture, 41 Austral. J. Leg. Phil. 81.

Tiersma, Peter (2005), The Textualization of Precedent, available from Social Science Research Network, http://ssrn.com/abstract=680901.

Treisman, Anne (1986), Properties, Parts, and Objects, in Kenneth R. Boff, Lloyd Kaufman, and James P. Thomas (eds), Handbook of Perception and Human Performance, New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Tubbs, J. W. (2000), The Common Law Mind: Medieval and Early Modern Conceptions, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman (1974), Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, 185 Science 1124.

Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman (1982), Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability, in Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic, and Amos Tversky (eds), Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman (2005), Availability, in Symposium: The Behavioral Analysis of Legal Institutions: Possibilities, Limitations, and New Directions, 32 Fla. St. L. Rev. 315.

Weinreb, Lloyd L. (2005), Legal Reason: The Use of Analogy in Legal Argument, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Westen, Peter (1982), On ‘Confusing Ideas': Reply, 91 YaleL. J. 1153.

Westen, Peter (1990), Speaking of Equality: An Analysis of the Rhetorical Force of ‘Equality’ in Moral and Legal Discourse, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Westen, Peter (2004), The Logic of Consent: The Diversity and Deceptiveness of Consent as a Defense to Criminal Conduct, Aldershot: Ashgate.

Whittington, Keith E. (1999), Constitutional Interpretation: Textual Meaning, Original Intent, and Judicial Review, Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.

Wistrich, Andrew J., Jeffrey J. Rachlinski, and Chris Guthrie (2015), Heart Versus Head: Do Judges Follow the Law or Follow Their Feelings?, 93 Tex. L. Rev. 855.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1997), Philosophical Investigations, G. E. M. Anscombe (transl.), Oxford: Blackwell.

Yablon, Charles M. (1987), Law and Metaphysics, 96 Yale L. J. 627.

Zapf, Christian, and Eben Moglen (1996), Linguistic Indeterminacy and the Rule of Law: On the Perils of Misunderstanding Wittgenstein, 84 Geo. L. J. 485.

Zipursky, Benjamin C. (2015), Reasonableness In and Out of Negligence Law, 163 U. Pa. L. Rev. 2131.