<<
>>

Poor Application of Statutory Control Policies

The control of BTB in Africa is a tale of woe. From the early 1900s onward, TB, both in humans and animals, received little attention from the regulatory authorities and farming communities in Africa, mainly because they focused on the more visible and rapidly fatal epidemic and endemic diseases that periodically ravaged the livestock populations on the continent (Carmichael 1938).

The situation has not changed, and almost a century later, the control of livestock diseases remains dismal because of the general inadequacy and incompetency of veterinary services in most

of the African countries. This is the consequence of the provision of inadequate human, infrastructural, and financial resources and the lack of recognition by policymakers of the importance of the diseases in humans and animals and the effect that they have on the general well-being of the human population and productivity of its livestock.

In respect to BTB, the disease persists because most of the African countries do not conduct systematic national tuberculin testing of cattle. Due to socioeconomic limitations in many countries, culling of tuberculin test-positive reactors, as part of the national BTB control policy, is not routinely done, and the infected cattle remain within the system. Only 7 of the 28 African countries that consider BTB important enough to list it as a notifiable disease apply test-and-slaughter measure for disease control; the remaining countries control the disease inadequately or not at all (Cosivi et al. 1998). Only a few countries, such as South Africa (since 1969), Morocco (since 1982), Tunisia (since 1984), Nigeria (since 1988), and Tanzania (since 1997), have statutory BTB control programs though they are mostly poorly or inadequately resourced and implemented (Berrada 1993; Ben Kahla et al. 2011; Ejeh et al. 2014; Sahraoui et al. 2011; OIE 2017).

In many African countries, abattoir records are the only sources of information about the occurrence and prevalence of BTB. The situation in Ethiopia is a good example of the limited value of this approach. Here official slaughter provides only 28% of meat consumed; the remaining 72% comes from unsupervised, backyard slaughter (Etter et al. 2006), where the chances of detecting BTB are poor, and even if it should be recognized, the event will probably not be reported to the relevant veterinary officials. Even in the countries with a formal control program, the implementation is often limited, and the efforts to control the disease are inadequate as they often only focus on a small proportion of the national herd. In Tanzania, for instance, only intensive dairy farms supplying milk to the human populace in urban centers are subject to compulsory screening with the single comparative cervical test (CCT) for BTB (Jiwa et al. 1997). Although this approach makes sense from an epidemiological point of view if you have to deal with limited resources, such herds are relatively few, and a large portion of the cattle population is excluded from the control program. In some countries, tuberculin skin testing is required only when there is a need to relocate dairy cows (Berrada 1993), or to satisfy the requirements of the importing country, before being accepted for slaughter by export abattoirs (Quirin et al. 2001).

It is clear that few countries in Africa are currently applying BTB eradication schemes and those that are, generally do not meet the OIE-based standards as practiced in North America, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand. South Africa perhaps is the closest to meeting these standards, and it recently updated its control strategy (DAFF 2013), but there too, most of the emphasis is on commercial farms. Morocco [with technical support from the Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO)] may reach this goal as it completed a feasibility study for conducting a BTB control program (Berrada 2006).

The general lack of attention to controlling BTB also has an impact on humans because of their susceptibility to infection with M. bovis. Consequently diseases such as BTB, which are often associated with resource-poor communities, are now categorized in the neglected zoonoses group, and there is increasing international awareness about the risk of consuming raw dairy products (Drewe et al. 2014). The situation is compounded by the lack of knowledge about zoonotic TB. Several studies, such as in Ethiopia (Ameni et al. 2013), Tanzania (Swai and Schoonman 2012), Zambia (Munyeme et al. 2010), and Western Africa (Unger and Munstermann 2004), confirmed that farmers’ awareness about the importance of zoonotic M. bovis is suboptimal.

Tschopp et al. (2013) summarized the imminent danger of zoonoses in the burgeoning intensive dairy farms in central Ethiopia, and this probably applies to many of the poorer African countries:

Despite six decades of efforts by government and non-governmental organizations to promote dairying, general awareness of milk-borne diseases is poor. Even when farmers seem better informed of the disease situation, it does not seem to be linked with an informed control policy, and hence there is no guarantee that it will change. Currently, the main danger is the introduction of zoonotic diseases among upgraded Holstein and their crosses origi­nating from high BTB prevalence areas such as Addis Ababa and its dairy belt.

The lack of understanding of the risk and the apathy of the regulatory authorities to control the disease are exemplified by the sale in central Ethiopia of stock from a dairy farm with a very high prevalence of BTB. The entire population of cattle, many suffering from BTB, was sold to unsuspecting local dairy farmers who scrambled to buy a few of the “high genetic value HolsteinZFriesians.” This situation allowed the uncontrolled movement of BTB-infected cows from the “depopulated farm” to multiple other farms and beyond. This is the consequence of a testing program that operates outside of any legal framework and not dealing adequately with BTB-positive reactors.

One effective way to improve this situation is to inform the general public about the risk of M. bovis infections and the need to deal with the disease according to tested international norms and standards. Accordingly, public awareness campaigns and sensitization of farmers and the general public should be key components in the overall strategy for the control of BTB (Amanfu 2006).

Against the background of the rapid, and perhaps, overwhelming increase in the size of the African population, the current state of affairs as they relate to the threats and impact of BTB and zoonotic TB is a major cause of concern. The number of people in Africa nearly trebled from the estimated 478 million in 1980 to the current almost 1.2 billion. Urbanization increased rapidly from 27% in 1980 to the current 40%, and it is estimated to reach 56% by 2050 at which time, the continent’s population is predicted to be 2.4 billion (UN 2016; World Population Review 2018). These figures are alarming given that the African countries as a group are the poorest in the world, and the current lack of infrastructure, financial resources, food, and space are crippling limitations when planning for the future. The little attention given to BTB and zoonotic TB has the potential for them to become overwhelming animal and public health problems, with a detrimental effect on the general population far in excess of what it is currently perceived to be; this because the extent and importance of important chronic diseases that have been present from antiquity are largely unknown and uncontrolled on the continent.

References

Alaku SO, Moruppa SM (1993) Tuberculosis condemnations in livestock slaughtered for meat in northeastern Nigeria. Prev Vet Med 15:67-72

Amanfu W (2006) The situation of tuberculosis and tuberculosis control in animals of economic interest. Tubercle 86:330-335

Ameni G, Tadesse K, Hailu E et al (2013) Transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis between farmers and cattle in central Ethiopia.

PLoS One 8:e76891. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0076891

Ashford DA, Whitney E, Raghunathan P et al (2001) Epidemiology of selected mycobacteria that infect humans and other animals. OIE Sci Tech Rev 20:105-112

Asseged B, Lubke-Becker A, Lemma E et al (2000) Bovine TB: a cross-sectional and epidemio­logical study in and around Addis Ababa. Bull Anim Health Prod Afr 67:71-80

Awad FI (1962) Studies on type-determination and epidemiology of tuberculosis among cattle in Sudan. Transbound Emerg Dis 9(9):890-898

Awah-Ndukum J, Kudi AC, Bradley G et al (2010) Prevalence of bovine tuberculosis in abattoirs of the littoral and western highland regions of Cameroon: a cause for public health concern. Vet Med Int. https://doi.org/10.4061/2010/495015

Ben Kahla I, Boschiroli ML, Souissi F (2011) Isolation and molecular characterization of M. bovis from raw milk in Tunisia. Afr Health Sci 11(S1):S2-S5

Benkirane A (1998) Bovine tuberculosis in Africa. Wild Anim Rev 90:54-56

Berrada J (1993) Mycobacterium bovis infection in cattle in Morocco: preparation and evaluation of chemical extracts for use in detection of immune responses. PhD Thesis, Iowa State University, USA

Berrada J (2006) Capacity building for surveillance and control of tuberculosis. In: Capacity building for surveillance and control of zoonotic diseases FAO/WHO/OIE Expert and Technical Consultation, Rome, 14-16 June 2005

Boukary AR, Thys E, Rigouts L et al (2012) Risk factors associated with bovine tuberculosis and molecular characterization of M. bovis strains in urban settings in Niger. Transbound Emerg Dis 59:490-502

Bruns AC, Tanner M, Williams MC et al (2017) Diagnosis and implications of Mycobacterium bovis infection in banded mongooses (Mungos mungo) in the Kruger National Park, South Africa. J Wildl Dis 53(1):19-29

Carmichael JL (1938) Tuberculosis of sheep in Uganda. Vet Rec 50:1138-1147

Carmichael JL (1939) Bovine tuberculosis in the tropics, with special reference to Uganda.

J Comp Pathol Therap 52:322-335

Cosivi O, Grange JM, Daborn CJ, Raviglione MC et al (1998) Zoonotic tuberculosis due to Mycobacterium bovis in developing countries. Emerg Infect Dis 4:59-70

Coulibaly ND, Yameogo KR (2000) Prevalence and control of zoonotic diseases: collaboration between public health workers and veterinarians in Burkina Faso. Acta Trop 76:53-57

Cousins D (2001) Mycobacterium bovis infection and control in domestic livestock. Rev Sci Tech OffInt Epiz 20:71-85

DAFF (2013) Bovine tuberculosis scheme manual (Interim). Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Republic of South Africa

DAFF (2017) Department of Agriculture Forestry and Fisheries: veterinary procedural notice for buffalo disease risk management in South Africa. http://www.daff.gov.za/vetweb/pamphlets& Information/Policy/Buffalo%20Disease%20Risk%20Management%20VPN_Signed%202017- 02-17.pdf

De Vos V, McCully RM, van Niekerk AWJ (1977) Mycobacteriosis in the Kruger National Park. Koedoe 20:1-9

Diguimbaye-Djaibe C, Hilty M, Ngandolo R et al (2006) Mycobacterium bovis isolates from tuberculous lesions in Chadian zebu carcasses. Emerg Infect Dis 12:769-771

Domingo M (2000) Current status of some zoonoses in Togo. Acta Tropica 76:65-69

Drewe JA, Pfeiffer DU, Kaneene JB (2014) Epidemiology of M. bovis. In: Thoen CO, Steele JH, Kaneene JB (eds) Zoonotic tuberculosis: M. bovis and other pathogenic mycobacteria, 3rd edn. Wiley, Chichester, pp 63-77

Du Toit PJ (1936) Bovine tuberculosis in South Africa. Tubercle 17:421-422

Ejeh EF, Raji MA, Bello M (2014) Prevalence and direct economic losses from bovine tuberculosis in Makurdi, Nigeria. Vet Med Int. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/904861

Elmossalami E, Siam MA, Sergany ME (1971) Studies on tuberculous-like lesions in slaughtered camels. Zentralbl Veterinarmed B 18:253-261

Etter EMC, Ameni G, Roger FLM (2006) Tuberculosis risk assessment in Ethiopia: safety of meat from cattle slaughtered in abattoirs. In: Proceedings of the 11th international symposium on veterinary epidemiology and economics (ISVEE), Cairns, Australia

Francis J (1959) The work of the British Royal Commission on Tuberculosis, 1901-1911. Tubercle 40:124-132

Gallagher J, Macadam I, Sayer J et al (1972) Pulmonary tuberculosis in free-living lechwe antelope in Zambia. Trop Anim Health Prod 4:204-213

Guilbride PDL, Rollinson DHL, Mcanulty EG et al (1963) Tuberculosis in the free living African (Cape) buffalo (Syncerus caffer caffer. Sparrman). J Comp Pathol 73:337-348

Hutcheon DT (1880) Consumption, Tables Mesenterica. Annual report, Colonial Veterinary Sur­geon. Cape of Good Hope

Jiwa SFH, Kazwala RR, Aboud AA et al (1997) Bovine tuberculosis in the Lake Victoria Zone of Tanzania and its possible consequences for human health in the HIV/AIDS era. Vet Res Commun 21:533-539

Jolles AE, Cooper DV, Levin SA (2005) Hidden effects of chronic tuberculosis in African buffalo. Ecology 86:2258-2264

Macadam I, Gallagher J, Mckay J (1974) Experimental tuberculosis in lechwe antelope in Zambia. Trop Anim Health Prod 6:107-109

Manley FH (1929) A note on bovine tuberculosis in tropical Africa (British Cameroons). J Comp Pathol Ther 42:276-278

Martin SW (1994) Livestock disease eradication: evaluation of the cooperative state-federal bovine tuberculosis eradication program. National Academies

Mason FE (1912) Some observations on tuberculosis in camels in Egypt. J Comp Pathol Ther 25:109-111

Michel AL (2008) Tuberculosis in wild and domestic animals in South Africa. PhD thesis, Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands

Michel AL, Geoghegan C, Hlokwe T et al (2015) Longevity of Mycobacterium bovis in raw and traditional souring milk as a function of storage temperature and dose. PLoS One 10(6): e0129926. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129926

Miller RS, Sweeney SJ (2013) Mycobacterium bovis (bovine tuberculosis) infection in North American wildlife: current status and opportunities for mitigation of risks of further infection in wildlife populations. Epidemiol Infect 141:1357-1370

Munyeme M, Muma JB, Munang’andu HM et al (2010) Cattle owners’ awareness of bovine tuberculosis in high and low prevalence settings of the wildlife-livestock interface areas in Zambia. BMC Vet Res 6:21. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-6-21

OIE (2017) World Animal Health Information Database (WAHIS Interface). https://www.oie.int/ wahis_2/public/wahid.php/Countryinformation/Animalsituation

Opara M (2005) Pathological conditions of condemned bovine lungs from abattoirs in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. Anim Res Int 2:314-318

O’Reilly LM, Daborn CJ (1995) The epidemiology of Mycobacterium bovis infections in animals and man: a review. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 76(Suppl 1):1-46

Paine R, Martinaglia G (1929) Tuberculosis in wild buck living under natural conditions. J Comp Pathol Ther 42:1-8

Quirin R, Rasolofo V, Andriambololona R et al (2001) Validity of intradermal tuberculin testing for screening of bovine tuberculosis in Madagascar. Onderstepoort J Vet Res 68:231-238

Renwick AR, White PCL, Bengis RG (2006) Bovine tuberculosis in southern African wildlife: a multi-species host-pathogen system. Epidemiol Infect 135:529-540

Rodwell TC, KriekNP, Bengis RG et al (2001) Prevalence of bovine tuberculosis in Africanbuffalo at Kruger National Park. J Wildl Dis 37:258-264

Sahraoui N, Muller B, Mamache B (2011) Tuberculosis in cattle and goats in the North of Algeria. VetRes 4:100-103

Skuce RA, Neill SD (2004) Molecular epidemiology of Mycobacterium bovis, Chapter 6. In: Madkour et al (eds) Tuberculosis. Springer, Berlin pp 75-92

Skuce RA, Allen AR, McDowell SWJ (2012) Herd-level risk factors for bovine tuberculosis: a literature review. Vet Med Int. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/621210

Smith NH (2012) The global distribution and phylogeography of M. bovis clonal complexes. Infect Genet Evol 12:857-865

Swai ES, Schoonman L (2012) A survey of zoonotic diseases in trade cattle slaughtered at Tanga city abattoir: a cause of public health concern. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 2:55-60

Tanner M, Michel AL (1999) Investigation of the viability of M. bovis under different environ­mental conditions in the Kruger National Park. Onderstepoort J Vet Res 66:185-190

Tarara R, Suleman MA, Sapolsky R et al (1985) Tuberculosis in wild olive baboons, Papio cynocephalus anubis (Lesson), in Kenya. J Wildl Dis 21(2):137-140

Tschopp R, Abera B, Sourou SY et al (2013) Bovine tuberculosis and brucellosis prevalence in cattle from selected milk cooperatives in Arsi zone, Oromia region, Ethiopia. BMC Vet Res 9:163

UN (2016) The demographic profile of African countries. https://www.uneca.org/sites/default/files/ PublicationFiles/demographic_profile_rev_april_25.pdf

Unger F, Munstermann S (2004) Assessment of the impact of zoonotic infections (BTB and brucellosis) in selected regions of the Gambia, Senegal, Guinea, and Guinea Bissau. - A scoping study - DFID Animal Health Program. Banjul, Gambia

World Population Review (2018) Africa Population. Retrieved 2018-04-02, from http:// worldpopulationreview.com/continents/africa-population/

<< | >>
Source: Dibaba A.B., Kriek N.P.J., Thoen C.O. (eds.). Tuberculosis in Animals: An African Perspective. Springer,2019. — 453 p.. 2019
More medical literature on Medic.Studio

More on the topic Poor Application of Statutory Control Policies:

  1. Control of infection policies
  2. Sample Position Description—Critical Care Transport Medical Control Physician (also known as Medical Control or Command Officer)
  3. Sample Position Description—Critical Care Transport Medical Control Physician (also known as Medical Control or Command Officer)
  4. Two and a half billion people worldwide, most of them in desperately poor, rural communities, need a better way to save and borrow.
  5. 2 More than one application
  6. 1 Statutory nuisances
  7. Ethics/Responsibilities of Approach to Less-Than-Optimal or Poor Care (or Perceived Malpractice), Analysis, and Follow-Up
  8. Ethics/Responsibilities of Approach to Less-Than-Optimal or Poor Care (or Perceived Malpractice), Analysis, and Follow-Up
  9. 2 The Statutory Tenancy
  10. 2 Excluding Statutory Rent Reviews
  11. 7 Dismissal of application
  12. 4 Application for tenancy