<<
>>

Domestic Violence in Abbasid Adab Anthologies

In order to get more intimate glimpses into the relationships, the possibilities, and the actions of violence within the domestic household and the family, one needs to look into anthologies of adab.

The two anthologies of the fourth/tenth-century Iraqi writer al-Muhassin ibn ‘Ali al-Tanukhi (d. 384/ 994), al-Faraj ba‘da al-shidda (Ease after Diversity) and Nishwar al-muhadara (The Elegant Talks of the Assembly), are particularly valuable as they contain material pertaining to the social history of the fourth/tenth century. Al- Tanukhi presents in both works references to historical personalities, events and places, encompassing a wide spectrum of society. The relevant anecdotes are rich in details on various aspects of Abbasid society.[600] The adab works of al-Tanukhi have been praised by modern Western scholars as ‘the most significant mine of historical anecdotes' concentrating on specific episodes reconstituting private and economic life, institutions and costume.[601] The material, when analysed, prods us to ask whether a man could beat his wife over the provision of sexual and emotional services, because of disagree­ments with her about her relatives, because she defied him verbally, or out of jealousy?[602]

One anecdote in al-Faraj relates that a young man, Bishr b. ‘Abdallah, was enamored with Jayda', a married woman. As she was jealously guarded by her husband, a ploy was devised to allow Jayda' to spend a night out with Bishr. Bishr secured the help of a male friend who masqueraded as the woman by wearing her clothes and returning to her house. Unfortunately,

NADIA MARIA BL CHBIkH

the fake wife broke a household utensil and her husband took a whip and lashed her back. She was saved by the intervention of the husband's mother and sister.[603]

The anecdote describes conflicts and tensions in private relations, the harmfulness of domestic intimacy, and some of the dynamics of household violence.

A man could resort to violence, striking his wife for a most trivial infraction. Jayda''s mother's only counsel was for her daughter to be obedient to her husband.[604] The threshold of permission for beating one's wife was thin indeed. Did such actions signify a certain normative behaviour and disciplin­ary practices deemed to be appropriate in connection to domestic govern­ance? It is not easy to discern what combination of individual psycho-sexual patterning, sense of male entitlement and location in historic time and space could permit any man to whip his wife for the most trivial of reasons.

The anecdote also provides a scenario of external involvement in such quarrels, with female relatives intervening on the wife's behalf. Family violence was a dramatic spectacle, played out in the presence of the hus­band's female relatives. For women, embeddedness in their spouse's family was the most effective means to counterbalance the overwhelming power of their husbands. Early Islamic societies, like most pre-industrial communities, tolerated the male privilege to hit (‘punish') wives as a way to express male authority.[605] Communities, however, had standards as to what constituted excessive violence and women often had allies within the community, most prominently the senior women. Such was the case in the previous anecdote. Assault cases were mediated informally by family members, notably the husband's mother. This was so because of the special ties that bonded sons to their mothers.[606]

Expectations about domestic chores and a generally submissive and obe­dient demeanour on the part of the wife were major sources of conflict leading to violent episodes. Husbands expected their wives to meet their immediate needs. In his comprehensive adab work al-‘Iqd al-farid, the fourth-/tenth-century Andalusian scholar Ibn Abd Rabbih (d. 328/940)

includes a passage that captures the traits of the ideal wife.

There, Umm Iyas advises her daughter, on the eve of her marriage, about the ten characteristics that she needs to keep if she is to be happy in her married life. Be submissive and obedient to him; always mind how you are going to look and smell so that he will see nothing ugly of you and smell only sweet smells; pay attention to his sleep and food, for hunger will provoke his hostility and disturbed sleep is a cause for anger; care for his money and guard his honour and family (the secret of managing money is to have good judgement while caring for the family and requires fine management); do not disobey him and do not betray his secrets (if you disobey him he will hold a grudge, and if you betray his secrets you will not be safe from his treachery); do not be happy if he is sad and do not show sadness if he is happy.[607] The woman has to be attractive physically and in all that pertains to the senses. She has to monitor her husband's daily well-being with respect to food and sleep lest his anger and hostility be provoked. Obedience and absolute discretion and loyalty are emphasised. These characteristics place a heavy burden on the wife and reflect the demanding role that wives were ideally expected to play. A wife's faithfulness and obedience are emphasised elsewhere in the text as summarised by a mother's counsel to her daughter: ‘Be to him a servant, he will be to you a slave.'[608] Such passages provide guidelines for the duties and responsibilities of women towards their husbands. Such was the model to which a woman living in the Abbasid era urban Near East was to aspire, and acting in contrary ways could exact a heavy price.

Although women were legally subject to their husband's discipline, the parameters of that discipline and the catalysts triggering wife beating con­tinued to be questioned. A characterisation that could constitute a catalyst for conjugal discipline occurs once again in al-‘Iqd al-farid. A section entitled ‘the characteristics of the wicked woman' (Sifat al-mar'a al-su') includes a descrip­tion of the archetypal wicked woman: she has a vicious tongue; she is prone to excesses, laughing with no restraint, and lying.

The wicked woman is someone ‘who hides the commendable actions or characteristics of her husband and exposes his ills. She is one who helps fate against her husband and does not help her husband against fate. She feels no mercy in her heart and has no fear of him. If he comes home she leaves and when he leaves she comes back. If he laughs she cries and if he cries, she laughs.' Moreover, she is foul and base, difficult to appease, and sheds tears, while she is tyrannical, talks, gesticulates, curses and lies.[609] In expanding on the characteristics that make a woman unfavourable, emphasis is placed on her bad temper, her lack of support and sympathy for her husband, her lack of interest in him and her unwillingness to attend to his every need. The topos of the garrulous female is also a persistent feature of these descriptions. Women's inappropriate speech or verbal challenges were classified as provocations and could also lead to physical violence. But generally, a woman behaving or feeling in any of the ways described above could potentially justify conjugal discipline.

Some anecdotes carry violence to its extreme limit. Such is the story about a beautiful and chaste woman from Baghdad. She had a cousin who was enamoured with her but her father married her to another. Her cousin continued to court her. Her husband left one day for some business and, wanting to cool down, she removed her cloths and sat by the well to wash. She left her golden rings by her cloths. A magpie stole her rings at the same time as her cousin was passing by. He retrieved the rings, put them on and sat by the pool so that the husband might see him and think that he was with his wife and hence divorce her. Such an eventuality would enable the cousin to marry her. When the husband came, the cousin stood up to salute him and made sure that the husband would see the rings in his hands. The husband recognised the rings, came in and saw his wife bathing. There was no doubt in his mind that this was the washing of janaba (ritual impurity) and that the cousin had had sexual intercourse with her.

Later that day, the husband had intercourse with her, did not ask her about anything and killed her.[610] In this case jealousy led to the murder of the wife. The level of violence was most acute because of his suspicion of her betrayal. His honour was at stake. Sexual jealousy constitutes a major cause for violence in the extreme.

Women in the adab texts of the late third/ninth and fourth/tenth centu­ries were confined by a stringently controlled normative conduct. The processes of moral control and discipline put the social role of women at the centre of the moral discourse, causing any deviation or transgression by women to be seen as a moral danger to society.[611] One anecdote reflects the deep fears that men felt at any possible humiliation brought to bear on them as a consequence of the behaviour of their female relatives, in this case their daughters.

One of my neighbors was Abu ‘Ubayda... He used to be a companion (nadim) of Ishaq b. Ibrahim al-Mas‘abi. He told me that one day Ishaq summoned him in the middle of the night... He [Ishaq] threw at me [Abu ‘Ubayda] papers that he was holding in his hands and said: read these. I read them all. They were the reports of the police chiefs... each one relating the day's events. All the reports mentioned raids undertaken against women who were found fornicating. They were the daughters of vizirs, umara' and notables who had died or who had lost their positions... [Ishaq said] I am afraid lest a similar fate befalls my five daughters and I have gathered them in this room to kill them immediately and find rest.[612]

In this anecdote it is the father who is about to inflict the ultimate punish­ment on his daughters, and that for no reason, the daughters having com­mitted no breach whatsoever.

What this story from this fourth-/tenth-century compilation clearly implies is that, in the absence of constant vigilance, the natural depravity of women would necessarily lead to their downfall.

Indeed, this anecdote presents in an almost obsessive way a testimony to the precariousness of the lives of even elite women and the profound fears of humiliation that their male relatives permanently had.

If free women lived amidst vulnerable conditions, one can only imagine the physical abuse that slave women could be subjected to by their owners. Slavery shaped the mores of Abbasid society and reshaped the Abbasid family. The presence of slave women led to a role reversal affecting the position of the free women, on the actual and affective levels. It was under these ever evolving conditions that the jurists worked out a legal system to regulate both family and property relations.[613]

The violence and abuse that were suffered by slave women are brought up in the texts in connection to ‘Inan, a slave woman who became a leading courtesan and elite singer in the Abbasid urban world. She achieved notoriety for her literary skills, hence her presence in the adab anthologies. In spite of her poetic skills, her education and her culture which brought social prestige to her master, when she refused to keep company with the poet Bakr she was lashed.[614] The anecdote reflects the ease with which ‘Inan could be severely beaten for a negligible infraction. And indeed, when on one occasion ‘Inan fell ill and asked her master, al-Natifi, to postpone the visit of the poet al- Ahnaf, al-Natifi showed no signs of compassion. He beat ‘Inan a number of times and forced her to receive her undesired visitor. ‘Inan cried and ‘her tears rolled down like pearls streaming out of a thread'. She responded by saying: ‘May he who beats her unjustly have his right hand harden upon his lash.'[615] Another slave woman, ‘Arib al-Ma'muniyya, was also subjected to beating by her owner. She fell in love with Hatim b. ‘Adi, a friend of her owner al-Marakibi. ‘Arib fled with her lover, stayed with him for a while and then left him. Her owner searched for her, and when he found her he hit her and dragged her to his house while she was shouting: ‘Oh you, why are you hitting me? I will not be patient with you. If I am a slave, sell me.'[616] ‘Inan's and ‘Arib's biographies highlight the difficulties and impediments that the skilled slave poetesses had to endure as well as the physical abuse that they were subjected to.

<< | >>
Source: Gordon Matthew, Kaeuper Richard, Zurndorfer Harriet (eds.). The Cambridge World History of Violence. Volume 2: AD 500-AD 1500. Cambridge University Press,2020. — 696 p.. 2020

More on the topic Domestic Violence in Abbasid Adab Anthologies:

  1. Domestic Violence in Abbasid Adab Anthologies
  2. Bibliographical Essay
  3. Section 9. Shari a, the state and domestic violence