<<
>>

Shigeru Akita and Naoto Kagotani

The purpose of this chapter is to reconsider the nature and the forma­tion of the 'International Order of Asia' in the 1930s in the light of new historiographical revisions in Great Britain as well as in Japan.

Recently several Japanese economic historians have offered a new perspective on Asian economic history.1 They argue that the economic growth of Asian countries was led by the phenomenon of intra-Asian trade which began to grow rapidly around the turn of the 19th-20th centuries. On the other side, the British imperial historians, PJ. Cain and A.G. Hopkins have presented their own provocative interpretation, 'Gentlemanly capitalism and British expansion overseas', in which they emphasize the leading role of the service sector rather than that of British industry in assessing the nature of British expansion over- seas.2 We will attempt here to integrate these new perspectives3 and to present a fresh interpretation of the international order of Asia in the 1930s. In this chapter, 'Asia' is taken to mean East Asia and Southeast and South Asia. The former includes Japan, the most industrialized country in Asia, the rising sovereign state of China and the then Japanese colony of Taiwan (Formosa). The latter consists mainly of the colonies of the European Powers, including British India and the Dutch East Indies.

This chapter is divided into three sections. At first, we will present broader frameworks and viewpoints of analysis on the international order of Asia in the 1930s, based upon our collaborative work with Japanese and Taiwanese scholars.4 Secondly, we try to analyze the British perceptions of Japanese economic development in the early 1930s. And thirdly, we will consider Japanese cotton-textile diplomacy in the first half of the 1930s.

I

<< | >>
Source: Akita Shigeru. Gentlemanly Capitalism, Imperialism and Global History. Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.,2002. — 279 p.. 2002

More on the topic Shigeru Akita and Naoto Kagotani:

  1. Notes on the Contributors
  2. Akita Shigeru. Gentlemanly Capitalism, Imperialism and Global History. Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.,2002. — 279 p., 2002
  3. 1 Introduction: from Imperial History to Global History
  4. Contents
  5. Index
  6. Boon Andrew. The Ethics and Conduct of Lawyers in England and Wales. Hart Publishing,1999. — 808 p., 1999
  7. Griffiths-Baker Janine. Serving Two Masters: Conflicts of Interest in the Modern Law Firm. Hart Publishing,2002. — 227 p., 2002
  8. Grisso T.. Evaluating Competencies: Forensic Assessments and Instruments. 2nd edition. — Springer,2002. — 564 p., 2002
  9. Luban David. Legal Ethics and Human Dignity. Cambridge University Press,2007. — 350 p., 2007
  10. Ayupova Z.K.. Theory of state and law: textbook. - Almaty: Kazakh Univer­sity,2015. - 192 pages., 2015
  11. Allen Danielle, Benkler Yochai et al. (eds.). A Political Economy of Justice. The University of Chicago Press,2022. — 416 p., 2022
  12. Barnes Rudolph C.. Military Legitimacy: Might and Right in the New Millennium.Frank Cass,1996. — 198 p., 1996
  13. Bedner Adriaan (ed.).. Real Legal Certainty and its Relevance: Essays in Honor of Jan Michiel Otto. Leiden University Press,2018. — 261 p., 2018
  14. Fridson M., Alvarez F.. Financial Statement Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,2002. — 413 p, 2002
  15. Banking, Finance, and Accounting: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications. IGI Global,2014. — 1593 p., 2014
  16. Hare C., Neo D. (eds.). Trade Finance: Technology, Innovation and Documentary Credit. Oxford University Press,2021. — 417 p., 2021
  17. Fligstein Neil. The Banks Did It: An Anatomy of the Financial Crisis. Harvard University Press,2021. — 334 p., 2021
  18. Cline W.. The Right Balance for Banks. Peterson Institute for International Economics,2017. — 281 p., 2017