<<
>>

Issue 7: Incorporating Culture Into Conflict Models

In addition to examining each type of conflict-related emotion in more detail, there is a general need to investigate conflict commu­nication using more diverse populations. The vast majority of research reported in this chap­ter comes from U.S.

samples consisting mostly of people with European American back­grounds. Yet scholars recognize that people from different cultures and cocultures express and regulate emotions differently (Planalp, 1999). In general, studies suggest that people from some Asian cultures tend to express less emotion than people from other cultures. For example, Rime, Corsini, and Herbette (2002) reported a study where people from France, Japan, Korea, Singapore, and the United States recalled their most recent experience of an unpleasant emotion. Although there were no cultural differences in felt emotional intensity, people from Japan, Korea, and Singapore reported significantly less emotional sharing than did people from France and the United States. For example, people from the United States reported that they shared their emo­tional experiences with others about 95% of time, whereas people from Korea reported sharing their emotions less than 80% of the time (see Rime, Finkenauer, Luminet, Zech, & Philippot, 1998, for details). Similarly, research has demonstrated that people from some Asian cultures avoid conflict and mask negative emotions such as shame, anger, and disgust more than their Western counterparts (Barnlund, 1989; Matsumoto, 2000). In con­trast, people from some Arab countries tend to approach conflict and express negative emotions more than people from the West (Almaney & Alwan, 1982; Feghali, 1997). As these studies suggest, cultural differences in emotional expression could exacerbate conflict in cross-cultural or intercultural interaction.

Indeed, some studies have shown differ­ences in conflict patterns based on culture or coculture.

Chua and Gudykunst (1987) noted that individuals from low-context cultures, such as the United States, use more solution- oriented conflict behaviors, while individuals from high-context cultures, such as Japan, prefer nonconfrontational behaviors. Flores, Tschann, Marin, and Pantoja (2004) found that Mexican American couples who were more oriented toward Mexican culture than Anglo culture tended to report avoiding con­flict, whereas those who were more oriented toward the Anglo culture tended to report expressing more feelings during conflict. Other research has shown that people in collectivist cultures are more likely to use avoidant con­flict strategies than are those in individualistic cultures, who are more likely to use confron­tational strategies (Cai & Fink, 2002; Pearson & Stephan, 1998).

In cultures where individuals value interde­pendence and group identity, people may be unlikely to confront one another or express nega­tive emotions (Kim & Leung, 2000). With regard to interdependent cultures, attention needs to be focused on nonverbal communication as a means of perceiving the indirect, emotional mes­sages conveyed during conflict (see Doi, 1973; Okabe, 1983). In addition, research on how people from various cultures manage emotions differently during conflict may be one of the keys to understanding some of the cross-cultural dif­ferences mentioned here.

<< | >>
Source: Oetzel John, Ting-Toomey Stella. The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Communication: Integrating Theory, Research and Practice. SAGE Publications,2013. — 912 p.. 2013

More on the topic Issue 7: Incorporating Culture Into Conflict Models: