Predictors of Work to Life and Life to Work Conflict
In conceptualizing predictors of W → LC and L → WC, Michel et al. (2011) had the following results: Across both realms, demographic variables, including marital status, parental status, personality, and gender, are significant and meaningful moderators of many WLC relationships.
Table 14.2 (on p. 380) provides the details of this study.As a quick summary of W → LC, as work role stressors increase, W → LC also increases; likewise, as w ork role involvement increases, W → LC also increases. Conversely, as social support in the work role increases, W → LC decreases. In the realm of w ork characteristics, task variety increases W → LC, but job autonomy and “family friendly organization” decrease W → LC. Stressors on the (family) life side were also found to affect W → LC, indicating that family members who are more socially supportive and provide a more understanding family culture reduce negative crossover effects (Michel et al., 2011).
To summarize L → WC, as role stressors in the (family)life domain increase, L → WC also increases. As social support in the (fam- ily)life domain increases, L → WC decreases. “Family climate” has also been studied as a predictor of L → WC: As it increases, L → WC decreases. Stressors on the work side were also found to increase L → WC. Furthermore, work social support was a predictor of L → WC; “these findings seem logical as organizations and coworkers who are supportive, and particularly ‘family supportive,’ probably engender less [L → WC] as they are more understanding and tolerant of an employee’s family life within the work domain” (Michel et al., 2011, p. 706).