<<
>>

In this chapter, we introduce a framework for learning from experience through reflection, an adaptation of Marsick and Watkins’ model of informal and inci­dental learning (Cseh, Watkins, and Marsick, 1999; Marsick and Watkins, 1990; Watkins and Marsick, 1993) and relate it to the challenges of conflict res­olution.

We discuss the roots of the framework in adult learning theory and Action Science, and draw out implications for use of the framework. We then illustrate ways in which a conflict participant could apply these ideas to more effectively achieve his objectives before, during, or after a conflict. Finally, we speak to implications for what a trainer or teacher can do to help a student learn to become a reflective practitioner of conflict before drawing some conclusions about the value and limitations of this model for conflict resolution.

<< | >>
Source: Deutsch Morton, Coleman Peter T., Marcus Eric C.. The Handbook of Conflict Resolution. Theory and Practice. 2nd edition. — Jossey-Bass,2000. — 649 p.. 2000

More on the topic In this chapter, we introduce a framework for learning from experience through reflection, an adaptation of Marsick and Watkins’ model of informal and inci­dental learning (Cseh, Watkins, and Marsick, 1999; Marsick and Watkins, 1990; Watkins and Marsick, 1993) and relate it to the challenges of conflict res­olution.: