<<
>>

BRONZE AND IRON AGE RELIGION: THE TRANSFORMATION OF THE SACRED

In Agricola’s list as well as in the Kalevala poetry the culture hero Ilmarinen plays a prominent role. Three sacral qualities, those of fire (Finnish tuli), of iron (Finnish rautd) and of the smithy (Finnish paja), connect Ilmarinen closely with the profession of a blacksmith.

The significance placed on iron as a marker of value in folk poetry strongly suggests that Ilmarinen appeared on the mythological scene during the Iron Age when the transition to a new metallic technology was taking place. Evidently, the agricultural context forms the cultural foundation for the presentation of Ilmarinen as a mythical blacksmith. Ilmarinen comes on stage as a culturally postulated human-like agent, a culture hero, whose purpose in the sacred narrative is to connect the annual promotion of growth-producing fertility within the kin-based economy to the primordial events in the mythical past.

The symbolic content attached to iron as a highly valued cultural product is also attached to the substance of iron slag (Finnish rautakuond), which plays an integral role in the process of separating metal from raw ore. Archaeologists have frequently observed iron slag in Iron Age burials. It has been found as grave goods and in the fill of graves in several places in Sweden, notably in the province of Gastrikland, where a third of the Viking period graves contained slag (Taavitsainen 1991: 12). The American archaeologist D. J. Shepherd has hypothesized that slag was deposited intentionally in Iron Age cremation cemeteries. Having carried out archaeological fieldwork in Finland, Shepherd posits that the slag “might have served as a symbolic metaphor equivalent to the corpse itself’ in Iron Age village culture and its funeral rites (Shepherd 1997: 13- 14). She suggests that in the Middle and Late Iron Ages communities there may have been a symbolic link by which slag and conceptions regarding the presence of a dead person’s soul and body in this and the world of the dead were connected.

According to Shepherd, the smelting of iron ore and its forging into iron may have been a form of ritual activity. Separating iron was likened to the Separation of the pure soul from the impure dead corpse. Iron slag is a by-product in the process of separating iron from the impurities of iron ore. This idea foregrounds the role of the blacksmith as the “technician of the sacred”, to use an expression coined by Mircea Eliade: that is, as the religious specialist needed in the ritual maintenance and crossing of the boundaries between that which was set apart as “the sacred” and illicit, and that which was regarded as the profane and licit. It should, however, be noted that Shepherd’s theory has its critics. The Finnish archaeologist Jussi-Pekka Taavitsainen (1991) suggests that the archaeological findings need to be more carefully identified, since it is not always clear from the evidence whether a particular site is a cemetery or a smithy.

Cemeteries became the key sacred sites both in Bronze and Iron Age village settlements in which communal rituals were performed. Their close proximity to dwelling sites and cultivated fields testifies to the sociological significance of the dead to the sacred order of the local community, as observed and emphasized by Uno Harva in his book Suomalaisten muinaisusko (“The ancient beliefs of the Finns”):

Numerous examples show that those who had departed to the underworld played a socially important part in ancient Finnish beliefs. The object of actual worship was, however, not the dead in general, but the respected dead of each family, the continuation of whose work and the fulfilment of whose wishes was the sacred duty of their descendants. This tradition was the basis of the whole social life of the ancient Finns. The departed were the guardians of morality and the judges of manners, and they maintained order in society. In this respect not even the god of the upper air could compete with those who had departed to the underworld.

(Harva 1948: 510-11)

Ritual communication between the living and the dead was one of the most significant social mechanisms by means of which values were expressed, transmitted and renewed in Finnish Bronze and Iron Age communities. From the Bronze Age (1500-500 BCE) until the end of the Iron Age in the twelft h century CE, the dead were first cremated and then buried, either in the cremation cemeteries on level ground as was the case in south-western parts of Finland, or in the cremation cemeteries of cairns in the provinces of Häme and Satakunta, the only exception being the Eura-Koylio-Yläne region in Satakunta where inhumation burials took place as early as the sixth century CE (see Lehtosalo- Hilander 1984: 284; Karvonen 1998: 4; Purhonen 1998: 188-9). On the basis of archaeological finds from the burial grounds, it can be deduced that religious ideas during the Bronze and Iron Age in Finland display a strong Scandinavian orientation. A new vision of life revolving around death and rebirth was incorporated into the religious practices. The metaphoric link between agriculture and death emphasized the continuation of life and was focused on the transmigration of the invisible soul. An interesting piece of evidence is provided by deliberately damaged objects which have been found in archaeological excavations in two sites dating back to the Merovingian period. In the spots studied, swords, spearheads, knives, saxes (large knife-like weapons from the Merovingian Age) and torques had been rendered useless either by bending and beating before being placed in the pyre or by being cut into pieces (see Karvonen 1998). There have been various attempts to explain the ritual breaking of the grave goods. Some archaeologists tend to think that breaking was an act of liberation of the souls of objects, so that they were able to follow the deceased to the world of the dead (ibid.: 5), while historians of religions have interpreted this practice as being based on the idea of the mirror image nature of the world of the dead: what is broken in this world will be whole in the world of the dead and vice versa (see Harva 1948: 297-8; Eliade 1964: 20).

Thus, in interpreting the data, the emphasis lies either on the materiality of ritual behaviour or on the religious nature of the mortuary practices. Damage is caused to the objects in order to prevent anyone from using them again, or because of a belief in the continuation of life after death. In Finnish scholarship on folk religion (see Pentikainen 1968), it has been stressed that the ancient notion of kin was conceived of in terms of unity; the kin included both living and dead members, whose participation in the production and maintenance of social values did not cease at death. The dead received their share of the farm’s yield at sacrificial stones, which contained one or more hollows called “cups”. Sacrificial stones were the major ritual sites for addressing the dead relatives and ensuring luck in growing the crops.

<< | >>
Source: Bredholt Christensen Lisbeth, Hammer Olav, Warburton David. The Handbook of Religions in Ancient Europe. Acumen,2013. — 456 p.. 2013

More on the topic BRONZE AND IRON AGE RELIGION: THE TRANSFORMATION OF THE SACRED:

  1. Bredholt Christensen Lisbeth, Hammer Olav, Warburton David. The Handbook of Religions in Ancient Europe. Acumen,2013. — 456 p., 2013
  2. Transformation (Specification)
  3. Ritual, Text, Discourse
  4. CHAPTER FOUR Town and Country Urban devotions and rural rituals