BIBLIOGRAPHY

Agassi, Joseph, ‘Corroboration versus Induction’, BJPS 9 (1959).

Agassi, Joseph, ‘The Role of Corroboration in Popper’s Methodology’, Australian

J. Phil. 39 (1961), reprinted here.

Agassi, Joseph, ‘Empiricism versus Inductivism’, Phil. Studies 14 (1963), reprinted here. Agassi, Joseph, ‘Sensationalism’, Mind 75 (1966), reprinted here.

Agassi, Joseph, ‘The Confusion between Science and Technology in Standard Philos­ophies of Science’, Technology and Culture 7 (1966), reprinted here.

Agassi, Joseph, ‘The Novelty of Popper’s Philosophy of Science’, I.P.Q. 8 (1968), re­printed here.

Agassi, Joseph, ‘Popper on Learning from Experience’, A.P.Q., Monograph Series No. 3, 1969, reprinted here.

Agassi, Joseph, ‘Changing Our Background Knowledge’, Synthese 19 (1968-9). Agassi, Joseph, ‘Agassi’s Alleged Arbitrariness’, Stud. Phil. Hist. Sci. 2 (1971). Agassi, Joseph, ‘The History of the Royal Society’, Organon (1971).

Agassi, Joseph, ‘Explaining the Trial of Galileo’, Organon (1972).

Ayer, Sir Alfred, Language, Truth, and Logic, Victor Gollancz, London, 1936. Ayer, Sir Alfred, The Problem of Knowledge, Macmillan, London, 1956.

Bartley, III, W. W., ‘Theories of Demarcation between Science and Metaphysics’, in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.), Problems in the Philosophy of Science, North- Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, 1968.

Bunge, Mario, Scientific Research, vols. I and II, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg and New York, 1967.

Bunge, Mario, (ed.) The Critical Approach to Science and Philosophy, Essays in Honor of Karl R. Popper, Free Press of Glencoe, London and New York, 1964.

Carnap, Rudolf, ‘Testability and Meaning’, Phil. Sci. 4 (1937).

Carnap, Rudolf, ‘Replies to Critics’, in P. A. Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, Open Court, La Salle, Ill., 1963.

Duhem, P., Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, Princeton U.P., Princeton, 1954.

Feyerabend, P., ‘Problems of Empiricism’, in R. G. Colodny, (ed.), Beyond the Edge of Certainty, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1965.

Feyerabend, P., ‘Against Method’, in Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, University of Minnesota Press, vol. 4.

Hempel, C. G., Aspects of Scientific Explanation, Free Press, N.Y., 1965.

Koestler, Arthur, The Sleepwalkers, London, 1963.

Lakatos, I., ‘Criticism and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes’, Proc. Arist. Soc. 69 (1968).

Lakatos, I., ‘Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes’, in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, CUP, Cambridge, 1970.

Lakatos, I., ‘History of Science and its Rational Reconstruction’, in R. Buck and R. S. Cohen (eds.), Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 8, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1971.

Musgrave, Allan, Forthcoming contribution to the Bucharest International Conference in the Philosophy of Science.

Polanyi, Michael, Personal Knowledge, Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy, University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, 1958.

Popper, Sir Karl, Logik der Forschung, Springer, Vienna, 1935. English Translation, The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Hutchinson, London, 1959.

Popper, Sir Karl, The Poverty of Historicism, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1957. Popper, Sir Karl, ‘The Aims of Science’, Ratio 1 (1957).

Popper, Sir Karl, Conjectures and Refutations, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1963. Sofia Price, Derek J. de, ‘Contra Copernicus: A Critical Re-estimation of the Math­ematical Planetary Theory of Ptolemy, Copernicus, and Kepler’, in Marshall Clagett (ed.), Critical Problems in the History of Science, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, 1959.

Stove, D., Review of Popper’s Logic of Scientific Discovery, Australasian J. Phil. 38 (1960).

Watkins, J. W. N., ‘Confirmation, the Paradoxes, and Positivism’, in M. Bunge (ed.), The Critical Approach, London and New York, 1964.

Wisdom, J. O., ‘Some Overlooked Aspects of Popper’s Contributions to Philosophy, Logic, and Scientific Method’, in M. Bunge (ed.), The Critical Approach, London and New York, 1964.