<<
>>

2 Idiopathic megaoesophagus in a dog

Initial presentation

Vomiting and regurgitation every 1 to 3 days for at least 6 months; concur­rent weight loss and recent (2 to 3 weeks) cough

Signalment: 2-year-old neutered male German shepherd dog, body weight 23.1 kg

Case history

The dog had been obtained from a rescue centre 6 months earlier.

The owner said that he was de-wormed regularly with a product from the gro­cery store and had been vaccinated at the time they obtained him.

He was usually bringing up food that appeared undigested and did not contain bile, although occasionally he also did bring up digested food and bile. There was no abdominal effort and he would bring up the food from minutes to about an hour after eating. It was determined that he was usually regurgitating, although sometimes there was an episode of true vomiting.

He was coughing occasionally during the previous 2 weeks and his ex­ercise tolerance had decreased. The dog’s stools had been normal and his water intake and urine output had not changed. The owner estimated that the dog had lost about 8 kg over the last couple of weeks.

His usual diet was a mixture of dry and canned dog food and he was normally fed twice a day. He was not fed table scraps and did not scav­enge. His appetite had decreased over the past 2 to 3 weeks, but had been good prior to that time.

His prior treatment included oral cimetidine and metoclopramide, which the owner thought may have slightly helped decrease the fre­quency of the vomiting or regurgitation.

Physical examination

The dog was bright and responsive. He had a body condition score (BCS) of 2/9. His mucous membranes were pink and his capillary refill time was less than 2 seconds. Thoracic auscultation revealed normal heart and lung sounds, with a heart rate of 90 beats per minute (bpm) and a respiratory rate of 36 breaths per minute. There was no evidence of pain on abdominal palpation.

Rectal temperature was 38.8° C.

When the dog was observed eating, it was found that he could pre- hend the food, appeared to form a normal bolus and could initiate swal­lowing without a problem. This made a pharyngeal disorder less likely to be the cause of the regurgitation.

Clinical tip

Differentiating vomiting from regurgitation can be a challenge and in some cases both are occurring. The time after eating does not always provide a clue, as some animals may vomit immediately after eating and others, especially those with megaoesophagus, may regurgitate hours after eating (Table 2.1).

Table 2.1 Differentiating regurgitation from vomiting

Clinical sign Regurgitation/oeso- phageal disorders Vomiting

Abdominal ef­fort None Present
Time of food ejection after eating Immediate to delayed, possibly for hours Delayed, possibly for hours, but may also happen immediately
Appearance of food Undigested Partly digested, may have bile present
pH of contents Should not be acidic Acid pH implies vomiting, but al­kaline material may also be vomited

Problem list and discussion of problems

• Vomiting

• Regurgitation

• Weight loss

The dog’s primary problem appeared to be regurgitation, although he also appeared to vomit occasionally as well. The weight loss was likely due to inadequate assimilation of food due to the regurgitating.

Differential diagnosis

For the regurgitation

• Oesophagitis

• Megaoesophagus, which can be idiopathic or due to an underlying cause

• Oesophageal obstructive disorders, e.g.

stricture, neoplasia, foreign body

• Hiatal hernia

• Vascular ring anomalies - unlikely due to the dog’s age (usually present in puppies)

• Granulomas due to Spirocerca lupi: unlikely as this parasite is not endemic in the UK and he had not travelled out of the UK

• Oesophageal diverticula

For the vomiting

• Disorders of the stomach

• foreign body

• gastritis

• ulceration

• chronic partial dilation-volvulus

• neoplasia

• Disorders of the small intestine

• foreign body

• inflammatory bowel disease

• neoplasia

• parasites

• intussusception

• Disorders of the large intestine (unlikely as there were no signs consistent with colonic disorders)

• colitis

• obstipation

•Systemic disorders

• Pancreatopathy

• Hypoadrenocorticism

• Diabetes mellitus

• Liver disorders

• Peritonitis

• Renal disease/uraemia (unlikely)

•Dietary causes

• Adverse reaction to food (allergy or intolerance)

• Dietary indiscretion

Case work-up [1] [2]

sign (Fig 2.1). There was an increase in pulmonary opacity with an interstitial-alveolar pattern over the cardiac apex and cranial to the heart on the lateral radiograph, which was consistent with aspiration pneumonia.

Fig 2.1

Radiograph of thorax showing dilated oesophagus

(courtesy of Dr Tobias Schwarz).

Diagnosis

Megaoesophagus with aspiration pneumonia. Megaoesophagus can have an underlying cause or may be idiopathic; differential diagnoses for the more common underlying causes include:

• Myasthenia gravis

• Polymyopathy

• Dysautonomia

• Oesophageal obstructive disorders (foreign body, stricture, neoplasia, extra-oesophageal compression) • Lead toxicity

• Hypoadrenocorticism

• Hypothyroidism (possibly)

Further testing

This dog had no other signs consistent with a polymyopathy or dysauto- nomia. Further diagnostic tests included serum creatinine kinase and AST concentrations, which were within the reference range and also made a myopathy less likely.

Physical examination, Schirmer tear test and pilocarpine response tests were also not consistent with dysautonomia.

Clinical tip

Pilocarpine response test

In an animal suspected to have dysautonomia, if the pupils are affected, one drop of dilute pilocarpine ophthalmic solution (0.05%) should be placed in one eye and the diameter of the pupil observed every 15 minutes for 1 hour. Most normal dogs will not usually respond to this concentration and those that do show only minimal response at 60 minutes. Miosis of the treated eye demonstrates denervation supersensitivity as expected with dysautono­mia. However, not all affected dogs will respond to the dilute pilocarpine, which could be a function of the time required for denervation supersensitiv­ity to develop. The pilocarpine test is useful to rule out anticholinergic tox­icity, which could cause many of the signs of dysautonomia. An anticholiner­gic drug would block the response of the pupil to pilocarpine (see Chapter 8).

Blood lead concentration was within the normal reference range at 0.02 μmol∕l. Values greater than 1.21 μmol∕l indicate probable toxicity.

An adrenocorticotrophin hormone stimulation test showed pre-stim- ulation serum cortisol of 89 mmol/l and a post-stimulation test of 321 mmol/l; which rules out atypical hypoadrenocorticism (i.e. hypo­adrenocorticism where only the corticosteroid concentrations are insuf­ficient and mineralocorticoid concentrations are sufficient to maintain normal serum potassium and sodium concentrations).

The dog’s serum acetylcholine receptor antibody titre was 0.02 nmol/ l, which is considered normal. A value greater than 0.6 nmol/l is dia­gnostic of myasthenia gravis, although 15% of affected dogs may not show an increased titer.

The dog’s total serum thyroxine concentration was just below the ref­erence range at 12.9 nmol/l (reference range 13-52 nmol/l) and his TSH concentration was 0.13 ng/ml, with a reference range of less than 0.41 ng/ml.

This most likely indicated a mild euthyroid sick condition in this dog rather than true hypothyroidism.

Endoscopy

At endoscopy, the oesophagus was found to be very large, flaccid and contained fermenting food and fluid within the folds. There was evid­ence of mild oesophagitis at the distal aspect of the oesophagus. There was also evidence of gastritis and inflammation of the duodenum. Histo­pathology of the gastric and duodenal mucosa showed mild lymphocytic plasmacytic inflammation.

Discussion

The cause of this dog’s vomiting was likely the mild inflammatory con­dition of his stomach and small intestine. This was treated successfully with metronidazole at 10 mg/kg twice a day for a month and a change to a novel protein, highly digestible diet.

The regurgitation was probably an unrelated condition. Reflux oeso­phagitis may cause regurgitation and even some dilation of the oeso­phagus, but not to the degree of dilation present in this dog. Underlying conditions were ruled out as far as possible, leaving the diagnosis as a probable idiopathic megaoesophagus.

Treatment for idiopathic megaoesophagus

Medical

Treatment for idiopathic megaoesophagus is supportive and includes providing food and water from elevated containers to allow the aid of gravity for swallowing (Fig 2.2) and feeding a high calorie food. Some dogs cope better with liquid or soft food and some do better with ‘meat­balls’ of dog food, so the diet has to be tailored for the individual.

Fig 2.2

Example of feeding a dog from a height.

Many promotility drugs have been tried unsuccessfully in an attempt to improve oesophageal motility in dogs with idiopathic megaoesophag­us. Drugs such as anticholinergics that decrease the gastro-oesophageal sphincter tone could theoretically be beneficial; however, these have not shown any benefit and could be detrimental in dogs with inhalation pneumonia or reflux oesophagitis.

This dog appeared to have both those conditions.

Surgical

Myotomy has been attempted for megaoesophagus, similar to the surgic­al approach for achalasia; however, dogs which had surgery had a worse outcome than those without surgery, so this is not recommended.

Epidemiology

Oesophageal dilation is a common cause of regurgitation and congenital idiopathic megaoesophagus is the most common form in the dog. Idi­opathic megaoesophagus is inherited in the wirehaired fox terrier by simple autosomal recessive gene and in miniature schnauzers by simple autosomal dominant of a 60% penetrance autosomal recessive pattern. A breed predisposition exists in the German shepherd dog, Great Dane, Irish Setter and Chinese Shar Pei and it likely has a hereditable basis in these dogs also.

Pathophysiology

Idiopathic megaoesophagus is likely due to a lesion in the afferent limb of the swallowing reflex resulting in a loss of peristaltic function in the oesophageal body. Sensory stimulus from the presence of food or liquid in the oesophagus is necessary to stimulate the oesophageal phase of swallowing and it is this sensory reinforcement of the swallowing reflex that appears to be affected.

Prognosis

The prognosis for patients with idiopathic megaoesophagus is guarded, although some young patients recover with time. Once chronic dilation is present there may be irreversible damage to the oesophagus. Many of the dogs will eventually die from aspiration pneumonia or undergo eu­thanasia due to debilitation from chronic malnutrition.

<< | >>
Source: Chandler M.. Small animal gastroenterology. Saunders,2011. — 588 p.. 2011
More medical literature on Medic.Studio

More on the topic 2 Idiopathic megaoesophagus in a dog: