<<
>>

Glacial Period: Conflicts and the Collapse of Circulations

For the Balkans and the Black Sea, the FirstWorld War (1914-18), fought primarily on land with minor sea engagements, was but another episode in a series of unending upheavals, and the region fell into a nightmare: in Anatolia, a million or more Armenians were massacred;[734] the Russian and Ottoman Empires, both exhausted, ultimately collapsed and splin­tered into a galaxy of small states.

A ‘de-hellenisation’ of Asia Minor brought about the resettlement of millions of Christians into mainland Greece, and conversely the expulsion ofTurks from Greece.[735] In Ukraine, pogroms continued in the context of the Russian civil war,[736] while Muslim populations disappeared almost entirely from Romania and Bulgaria. A process of ethnic and religious homogenisation took place across the entire region on an epic scale. Most of the political and social troubles or controversies occurring today in the Black Sea region can be traced back to that period of extreme human suffering. This contributed to changing the perception of the Black Sea (as in Rubin’s optical illusion of a vase that can be interpreted as two faces) from a single body of water, to sepa­rate pieces of coastline belonging to nation-states turning their back on the sea, often in violent contrast with one other.

The defeat of the White Russians in Crimea (November 1921) occa­sioned a new exodus of nearly a hundred thousand refugees from Sevastopol, thanks to the ships of the Black Sea fleet. The new order of the interwar period led to the reincorporation of the suc­cessor states of the Russian Empire into the Soviet Union and the birth of a Turkish nationalist state (the Republic of Turkey). To the west, Romania recovered Bessarabia - the part of the principality of Moldavia lost in 1812.

By contrast, a radical change in the regime of the Black Sea came with the Treaty of Lausanne of 24 July 1923 in which the Western Allies of World War I recognised the new Republic of Turkey as the successor state to the Ottoman Empire.

The former system of bilateral treaties of foreign countries for the passage of the Straits was replaced by a mul­tilateral agreement with Turkey: the Convention relating to the Regime of the Straits. It established the principle of ‘freedom of transit and of navigation, by sea and by air, in time of peace as in time of war’ through the Straits. With the Straits demilitarised and under an International Commission, Turkey no longer had the power to impede any traffic at any time, with the only exception of wars in which it would be itself belligerent - in which case, it would have to grant right of passage to neutral ships, whether merchant or military. The Montreux Convention on the Regime of the Straits of 1936 made a compromise that was more favourable to Turkey: it brought the Straits back under its military con­trol and allowed a refortification of the Dardanelles. The clauses for merchant ships remained more or less the same including in case of war; the greatest change was for vessels of wars, whose right of passage was more strictly regulated. In time of war, when Turkey was neutral, bel­ligerent powers would be denied passage, while if Turkey was involved, it would do as it pleased.

One might think that largely opening access to commerce in the Black Sea would have been the end of the region’s trials, yet it was not to be: sea commerce plummeted on the northern shore, now under the control of the Soviet Union. In the 1920s, Russia and Ukraine suffered a terrible shortage of food that killed millions as a consequence of war and droughts: the bread basket of Russia suddenly failed to feed itself, but the traditional solution of bringing relief supplies by sea was applied. A new famine known as the Holodomor occurred again in the 1932-33 under Joseph Stalin; this time, there was no relief from the sea and the death toll was staggeringly high.

A secret clause in the non-aggression pact between Hitler and Stalin in 1939 (the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact) conceded Bessarabia back to the Soviet Union, as part of its ‘sphere of influence’.

After the country was annexed (and rebranded as the Republic of Moldova), tens of thousands of Romanian-speaking inhabitants were deported or massacred and the German population expelled.

The subsequent war between Germany (with its allies Romania and Bulgaria) and the USSR had the effect of closing the Straits to the bellig­erents of both sides, as Turkey remained neutral. This not only prevented the British navy from assisting the Russians; it effectively prevented Italy and Germany sending their own war vessels into the Black Sea. As a result, naval warfare on the Black Sea was almost non-existent during World War II, in comparison to the enormous land operations. Extreme violence seems to have been a hallmark of the region: the occupation of Ukraine provided another opportunity for mass carnage, with the killing or deportation of nearly two-thirds of the Jewish population from the region by the Germans and their allies.[737] Crimea, for its part, was the scene of fierce land fighting that gave rise to particularly cruel episodes (for the Russians, the defence of Sevastopol built its patriotic signifi­cance on the defeat of the Crimean War). Finally the Battle of Stalingrad (September 1942-February 1943), one of the deadliest in recorded his­tory, took place halfway between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea. In the contest for pre-eminence between land and sea in the region, the first was definitely winning.

As if finally to accomplish the ambitions of Tsarist Russia, the defeat of Germany allowed the USSR to expand its control over the western shore of the Black Sea: it brought the Soviets back to Bessarabia, which they re-annexed. The coastline of the Black Sea between Odessa and the River Prut, which had belonged so far to Bessarabia was ceded to Ukraine, making the new Republic of Moldova landlocked; it also placed Romania and Bulgaria under Soviet domination. The Crimean Tatars, accused en masse of collaborating with the Nazis were deported to Central Asia.

The Western Allies staunchly supported Turkey against a Soviet seizure of the Straits and the Anatolian land routes to Persia and the Middle East, pursuing a similar geostrategic policy as with the Ottoman Empire a century earlier. (Turkey joined the US-led NATO in 1952.)

The Cold War therefore closed the Black Sea, dividing it in two: a communist north under the Warsaw Pact, and Turkey to the south within NATO.[738] Most sea connections between the two ‘worlds’ were interrupted, with the notable exception of long-distance trade through the Straits (especially from the port of Novorossyisk). To make things more complicated, an awkward redistribution of territory occurred in the Black Sea in the early 1950s, the consequences of which are felt to this day: Nikita Khrushchev gave Crimea to the Ukrainian Soviet Republic (1954). What had merely been an administrative division became a seri­ous issue when the Soviet Union split apart in 1991.[739]

<< | >>
Source: Armitage David, Bashford Alison et al. (eds.). Oceanic Histories. Cambridge University Press,2018. — 338 p.. 2018

More on the topic Glacial Period: Conflicts and the Collapse of Circulations:

  1. The culturally defined Palaeolithic is a rather large time period spanning from the earliest stone artefacts around 2.6 million years ago until the end of the last glacial around 10,000 BP.
  2. An Example of Conflicts Rather Than Passive Subordination and the Need for a Theory of Conflicts
  3. Maritime Circulations in the Twilight of Empires
  4. In the early seventeenth century Japan transitioned from a period of pro­longed and nationwide internecine civil war (the Warring States period, 1467-1600) to an era of extended peace during the early modern, or Tokugawa, period.
  5. 12. The Soviet Collapse
  6. The Real Dominos: The Soviet Union’s Sudden Collapse
  7. REGULATING CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
  8. The peace process, its collapse and attempts to revive it
  9. The period covered in this chapter, from the death of Herod the Great, King ofthejews, in 4 âñå to the end of the secondjewish war with Rome in 135 ce, is a period of lingering and terminal crisis in the history of Israel
  10. Polarization and Collapse
  11. The collapse of the Grand Alliance
  12. Who were the dissidents, and how did they contribute to the collapse of communism?
  13. The Nature of Conflicts
  14. Brief History of Regulating Solicitors’ Conflicts of Interest
  15. The Disintegration and Collapse of the Western Roman Empire
  16. What religions came to prominence in Ukraine after the Soviet collapse?
  17. Conflicts with Authorities, to 135 ce
  18. The Swedish War and Collapse of the Polish-Lithuanian Kingdom