<<
>>

The notion that Islam is a religion that thrives on violence was part and parcel of European medieval polemics.

‘The use of force', writes Norman Daniel, ‘was almost universally considered to be a major and characteristic constituent of the Islamic religion, and an evident sign of its error.'1 In the Western imagination, Muslim warfare, or jihad, has been just one aspect of the Islamic penchant towards violence; another is the perceived cruelty and arbitrariness of the Islamic penal system.

Traces of this preconception can be found also in modern times. As an example, one might mention that violent executions at the hands of fearsome, massively muscular Arab henchmen were a popular trope of nineteenth-century Orientalist painters, as seen, for example, in the two paintings, ‘Execution of a Moroccan Jewess' (1860) by Alfred Dehodencq (1822-82) and ‘Execution without Trial under the Moorish Kings of Granada' (1870) by Henri Regnault (1849-71).

While it has become a common scholarly tactic in recent decades to question approaches that otherise the European Middle Ages from the perspective of the modern, rational nation-state, declaring them uniquely irrational and violent, careful scholarly investigations into the complex mechanisms of penal justice and crime control under premodern Islamic regimes remain a desideratum. This is not to say that the Islamic prosecution of crime, in the period under consideration here (c. eleventh to fifteenth centuries), was not arbitrary and violent, even if it bears mentioning that Western travellers to the Near East sometimes praised the efficiency, and also the fairness, of the penal system in place under the Ottoman sultans (r. c. 679-

Author's note: This chapter was written during a fellowship at the Netherlands Institute of Advanced Studies in autumn 2015.

1 Norman Daniel, Islam and the West: The Making of an Image (1960; rev. edn Oxford: Oneworld, 1993), p. 131.

1342/c. 1280-1924).

But it should not be overlooked that scholars can still see significant progress in their understanding of the history of state punishment in Islamic societies, whether in terms of longue duree continuities or of spatio-temporal variations. Synchronically speaking, the social matrix in which state punishment was embedded in the various premodern Muslim polities deserves closer inspection, such that the story that is told is not simply one of Oriental despotism, of brute violence perpetrated from the top down upon passive victims, but one that paints a fuller picture of the networks of relations that obtained between the social actors that were involved in the penal process, namely, those who implemented, those who theorised about, and those who suffered punishment by the state.

This chapter first reviews the normative bases for penal state violence, in particular for capital punishment and torture, in Islamic law and Islamic political theory. It then moves on to discuss a number of examples from Islamic historiography, first from the reign of the Seljuq sultans of Persia, Iraq and Syria (r. 1040-1194) and then, second, from that of the Mamluk sultans of Egypt and Syria (r. 1250-1517). The Seljuqs and Mamluks exemplify the ‘new Sunni internationalism' of the so-called Islamic Middle Period, a socio-poli­tical order based on a delicate balance of the military, religious and mercantile strata of society. Moreover, the few available, book-length studies of crime and punishment in premodern Islam are focused on the Seljuq and the Mamluk periods. In the following text, these studies serve as convenient points of departure.

<< | >>
Source: Gordon Matthew, Kaeuper Richard, Zurndorfer Harriet (eds.). The Cambridge World History of Violence. Volume 2: AD 500-AD 1500. Cambridge University Press,2020. — 696 p.. 2020

More on the topic The notion that Islam is a religion that thrives on violence was part and parcel of European medieval polemics.:

  1. Cattelan Valentino. Religion and Contract Law in Islam: From Medieval Trade to Global Finance. Routledge,2023. — 230 p., 2023
  2. It may cause some surprise that a chapter on Medieval European chivalry takes as its focus issues of causation or even encouragement of violence, rather than its restraint or careful moderation.
  3. PART IV RELIGION, RITUAL AND VIOLENCE
  4. The medieval foundations of the European state
  5. The Imperial Commonwealths of Medieval Islam and Western Christendom
  6. CHAPTER 17 Between Medicine and Magic: Spiritual Aetiology and Therapeutics in Medieval Islam
  7. Hallaq Wael B.. Law and Legal Theory in Classical and Medieval Islam. Routledge,2022. — 344 p., 2022
  8. Europe has always had an interest in and fascination with the part of the world today called “the Middle East,” the lands to its south and east, which have since the seventh century been the heartlands of the Realm or House of Islam (Dar al-Islam).
  9. Islam and African Traditional Religion
  10. The theme ‘religion and violence' or ‘religious violence' gained worldwide attention after the terrorist attacks on the Twin Towers and the Pentagon in 2001.1
  11. This chapter will explore ritual violence in the form of close combat in pre­colonial western Africa (and the African diaspora) during the period of European contact from the mid fifteenth century until the late nineteenth century, a period which saw an end to the slave trade and the start of European colonisation.
  12. RELIGION IN INDO-EUROPEAN HISPANIA
  13. Seigneurial Violence in Medieval Europe
  14. To ask what state-sanctioned violence meant in medieval Japan (1185-1615) is to be confronted with two attendant questions: what counted as violence; and what counted as state-sanctioned?
  15. The centuries following the first appearance of Islam in the subcontinent were among the most creative in the history of religion in India.
  16. The space of law and religion in Islam
  17. Warrior Regimes and the Regulation of Violence in Medieval Japan
  18. European Influence on Indigenous Forms of Ritualised Violence and Sacrifice