References
Ackerman, Bruce. 1997. The rise of world constitutionalism. Virginia Law Review 83: 771-797.
Bellamy, Richard. 2007. Political constitutionalism: A Republican defence of the constitutionality of democracy.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Bickel, Alexander. 1962. The least dangerous branch. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Carolan, Eoin. 2013. Between supremacy and submission: A model of collaborative constitutionalism? Available at ssrn.com/abstract=1889243.
Dixon, Rosalind. 2009. The Supreme Court of Canada, charter dialogue, and deference. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 47: 235-286.
Dworkin, Ronald. 1977. Taking rights seriously. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Ewing, Keith. 2011. The bonfire of the liberties. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fallon, Richard. 2008. The core of an uneasy case for judicial review. Harvard Law Review 121: 1693-1736.
Ferreres Comella, V. 2009. Constitutional courts and democratic values, 66-70. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Gardbaum, Stephen. 2001. The new commonwealth model of constitutionalism. American Journal of Comparative Law 49: 759-810.
Gardbaum, Stephen. 2007. Limiting constitutional rights. UCLA Law Review 54: 789-851.
Gardbaum, Stephen. 2013. The new commonwealth model of constitutionalism: Theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gardbaum, Stephen. 2015. Are strong constitutional courts always a good thing for new democracies? Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 53: 51-86.
Glendon, Mary Ann. 1991. Rights talk: The impoverishment of political discourse. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Goldsworthy, Jeffrey. 2010. Parliamentary sovereignty: Contemporary debates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Harel, Alon Harel, and Tsvi Kahana. 2010. The easy core case for judicial review. Journal of Legal Analysis 2: 227-256.
Harel, Alon, and Adam Shiner. 2012. Between legislative and judicial supremacy: A cautious defense of constrained judicial review. International Journal of Constitutional Law 10: 950-975.
Jackson, Vicki, and Mark Tushnet. 2006. Comparative constitutional law, 2nd ed. New York: Foundation Press.
Jowell, Jeffrey. 1999. Of vires and vacuums: The constitutional context of judicial review. Public Law 1999: 448-460.
Kavanagh, Aileen. 2009. Constitutional review under the UK human rights act, 417-419. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kolstad, C., T. Ulen, and G. Johnson. 1990. Ex Post liability for harm vs. Ex Ante safety regulations: Substitutes or complements? American Economic Review 80: 888-901.
Kumm, Mathias. 2007. Institutionalizing Socratic contestation. European Journal of Legal Studies 1: 1-32.
Kumm, Mathias. 2009. Democracy is not enough: Rights, proportionality and the point of judicial review. New York University Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers Paper 118: 1-38.
Kyritsis, Dimitrios. 2012. Constitutional review in a representative democracy. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 32: 297-324.
Perry, Michael. 2003. Protecting human right in a democracy: What role for courts? Wake Forest Law Review 38: 635-694.
Sadursky, Wojiech. 2002. Judicial review and the protection of constitutional rights. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 22: 275-299.
Sager, Lawrence. 1978. Fair measure: The legal status of underenforced constitutional norms. Harvard Law Review 91: 1212-1264.
Shavell, Steven. 1987. Economic analysis of accident law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Stone Sweet, Alec. 2000. Governing with judges: Constitutional politics in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thayer, James Bradley. 1901. John Marshall. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Tomkins, Adam. 2005. Our Republican constitution. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Tushnet, Mark. 2003. Alternative forms of judicial review. Michigan Law Review 101: 2781.
Waldron, Jeremy. 1998. Participation: The rights of rights. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 98: 307-337.
Waldron, Jeremy. 2006. The core of the case against judicial review. Yale Law Journal 115: 1346-1406.
Waldron, Jeremy. 2009. Judges as moral reasoners. International Journal of Constitutional Law (I-CON) 7: 2-24.
More on the topic References:
- References
- References
- References
- References
- References
- References
- References
- References
- References
- References