<<
>>

Conclusion

In the Greek Gospel of the Egyptians, originally independently existing sayings[559] have been combined to form a single argument about the end time. This is true for the question of Salome in Saying 4 about when she would know.

The reference to the destruction of female works in Saying 1 is reprised in Saying 4 with the statement about the abolition of the catego­ries male/female. I would thus argue that this collection of sayings forms another example of Christian testimonia.[560]

It is this complex that Julius Cassianus used and that Clement then at­tempted to interpret differently. The complex begins with an enigmatic statement ascribed to Jesus and then, as in the Dialogue of the Savior, at­tempts to interpret it. The originally misogynistic attack on women moves in the first interaction to an attack on procreation and then changes by the second interaction into a yearning to imitate Eden. The final summative statement given by Jesus holds that gender categories are to be eliminated at the end time when Eden will return. This complex of the Greek Gospel of the Egyptians would thus be mitigating a tendency among male Chris­tians to shun women. It is a clear exhortation to sexual continence, but does not outrightly reject marriage. It would thus emanate from that group of Christians whom Giulia Sfameni Gasparro characterizes as praising enkrateia for its doctrine of sexual abstinence and who suggested it as a condition of becoming the perfect Christian. However, they did not con­demn marriage, as did some other Christians.[561] Julius Cassianus would at­tempt to move the Greek Gospel of the Egyptians in this more radical di­rection, but Clement would counter-interpret the document allegorically to retain marriage as a viable option for Christians. What is interesting is that the argument in the Greek Gospel of the Egyptians completely overturns the sense of subordination of women, and rather places them on an equal footing with men.

Baptized Christian women are in a pre-lapsarian state, as held in Gal 3:28. Such a state would seem to be implied also in OdesSol. 25:8: “I was covered with the covering of your spirit, and you removed from me the garments of skins.” Such a protological stance in the second century would thus be an argument for the equal status and function of women in early Christianity. Should one compare it with the role of Thecla?

Appendix

The saying, “I have come to bring female works to an end,” has also been used in a different formulation in the Paschal Homily attributed to Hippol­ytus, which has been dated to the 2nd century c.e.[562] As the preacher speaks about how Jesus on the cross undid what the transgression of Adam brought, he notes how the crown of thorns Jesus wore took away the curse on the ground (Gen 3:18), how, by drinking the bitter gall of the Dragon (Matt 27:34), Jesus mingles for us in its place sweet wells.[563] The preacher continues: “For wishing to epyov Tqs OqXeias Xuoai and to hold back the death-dealing [femaleness] flowing from the rib, already he opened the holy rib in himself from which flowed the holy blood and water, the per­fect signs of the spiritual, mystical marriages and adoption and new birth” (53:3). Commenting of the water and blood, the homilist refers to baptism in spirit and in fire (Matt 3:11, where the water refers to baptism in spirit, the blood to baptism in fire.) Here the preacher has used the singular, and contrasted the new life/birth (παλιγγενεσία) with the production of Eve, described as death-dealing. Here the saying should be translated: “the product which is femaleness.” The production of Eve, standing for female­ness is contrasted with Jesus’s reversal of the action, returning baptized Christians to the primordial unity.

Works Cited

Albi, Martin C. And Scripture Cannot Be Broken: The Form and Function of the Early Christian Testimonia Collections.

Leiden: Brill, 1999.

Baarda, Tjitze. “2 Clement 12 and the Sayings of Jesus.” BETL 59 (1982): 529-56.

Brock, Sebastian. “Clothing Metaphors as a Means of Theological Expression in Syriac Tradition.” Pages 15-26 in Typus, Symbol, Allegorie bei den ostlichen Vätern und ih­ren Parallelen im Mittelalter. Edited by Margot Schmidt. Eichstätter Beiträge 4; Re­gensburg: Pustet, 1981.

Callan, Terrence. “The Saying of Jesus in Gos. Thom 22/2Clem.12/Gos.Eg.5.” JRelS 16 (1990): 46-64.

Cameron, Ron. The Other Gospels: Non-Canonical Gospel Texts. Philadelphia: West­minster, 1982.

Cantalamessa, Raniero. L’Omelia Tn S.Pascha’ dello pseudo-Ippolito di Roma. Ricerche sull teologia dell’Asia Minore nella seconda metà del II secolo. Milan: Vita e pensi­ero, 1967.

Coogan, M. D. Stories from Ancient Canaan. Philadelphia: Westminster, 1978.

Donfried, Karl. The Setting of Second Clement in Early Christianity. Leiden: Brill, 1974. Emmel, Stephen. The Coptic Gnostic Library. Leiden: Brill, 1984.

Ernest, John, Leonard Oulton, and Henry Chadwick. Alexandrian Christianity. London: SCM, 1954.

Gasparro, Giulia Sfameni. “Le Motivazioni Protologiche dell’ ENKRATEIA nel Cristia­nesimo dei Primi Secoli e nello Gnosticismo.” Pages 149-252 in La Tradizione dell’Enkrateia. Motivazzioni Ontologiche e protologiche. Edited by Ugo Bianchi; Rome: Ateneo, 1985.

-. “Asceticism and Anthropology: Enkrateia and ‘Double Creation’ in Early Christ­ianity.” Pages 127-46 in Asceticism. Edited by Vincent L. Wimbush and Richard Val- antasis. New York: Oxford, 1995.

Griffith, Sidney H. “Asceticism in the Church of Syria: The Hermeneutics of Early Syri­an Monasticism.” Pages 220-45 in Asceticism. Edited by Vincent L. Wimbush and Richard Valantasis. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.

Lambdin, Thomas O. Introduction to Sahidic Coptic. Macon, GA: Mercer University, 1983.

Layton, Bentley. The Gnostic Scriptures. New York: Doubleday, 1987.

MacDonald, Dennis Ronald.

There Is No Male and Female: The Fate of a Dominical Saying in Paul and Gnosticism. HDR 20; Philadelphia: Fortress, 1987.

Meeks, Wayne A. “The Image of the Androgyne: Some Uses of a Symbol in Earliest Christianity.” HR (1974): 165-208.

Meyer, Marvin W. “Making Mary Male: The Categories of ‘Male’ and ‘Female’ in the Gospel of Thomas.” NTS 31 (1985): 554-70.

Nautin, Pierre ed. Homelies Pascales I. SC 27. Paris: Cerf, 1950.

Petersen, Silke. “Zerstort die Werke der Weiblichkeit!” Maria Magdalena, Salome und andere Jüngerinnen Jesu in christlich-gnostischen Schriften. Brill: Leiden, 1999.

Russell, Norman. The Lives of the Desert Fathers. Oxford: Mowbrat, 1980.

Schneemelcher, Wilhelm. “The Gospel of the Egyptians.” Pages 209-15 in volume 1 of New Testament Apocrypha. Translated by R. McL.Wilson. Westminster/John Knox: Louisville, 1991.

Smith, Jonathan Z. “The Garments of Shame.” HR (1988): 217-38.

Vogt, K. “‘Becoming Male’: One Aspect of an Early Christian Anthropology.” Con­cilium (1985): 95-107.

Ward, Benedicta. The Desert Christian: Sayings of the Desert Fathers. The Alphabetical Collection. New York: MacMillan, 1975.

<< | >>
Source: Ahearne-Kroll Stephen P., Holloway Paul A., Kelhoffer James A. (eds.). Women and Gender in Ancient Religions: Interdisciplinary Approaches. JCB Mohr (Paul Siebeck),2010. — 518 p.. 2010

More on the topic Conclusion:

  1. Conclusion
  2. Conclusion
  3. Conclusion
  4. CONCLUSION
  5. Conclusion
  6. Conclusion
  7. Conclusion
  8. Conclusion
  9. Conclusion: where to next?
  10. Conclusion
  11. 5.5 CONCLUSION
  12. CONCLUSION
  13. Conclusion
  14. CONCLUSION AND REFLECTIONS
  15. Conclusion The Pyramid of Peace: Past, Present and Future