Progressive Judaism: the First Phase
In the ghetto, the closed Jewish community contained conservative and progressive thought, with much leeway given to the free-thinker and sceptic (even Spinoza was offered a generous living if he would only refrain from publishing).
But once dogma, customs and ceremonies seemed the only way to remain Jewish, progressive thought was challenged. However, traditionalism was no longer enforced by civil law, although the Christian authorities often listened to the plea of the new traditionalist ‘Orthodox’ party to curb innovations within the Jewish community. Central to the new ‘Reform’ party was the leadership of the laity. They wanted a service resembling the pattern they saw in church: choirs, mixed seating in family pews, organ music, confirmation and the use of the vernacular tongue. In achieving this, partly through the work of Israel Jacobson (1768-1828), a lay leader of ability and wealth, they still remained Jews. Zunz proved that the sermon had traditionally been preached in the vernacular. The option for anyone leaving Judaism was conversion or rejection of any religion, so that Reform proved to be a viable alternative to total assimilation. Rabbis came forward bringing old proofs for new practices, notably Abraham Geiger (1810-74). Their teachings spoke the language of their time: rational, liberal, rejecting the old dream of national life to be reborn in Palestine by affirming that perfection could be found where they lived (which also meant an attack upon the messianism and mysticism then flourishing in Eastern Europe). Often, the rabbinic writings built upon Kant and Hegel rather than Maimonides or Judah Halevi.Neglecting the links to Jewish nationhood which were to re-emerge later in the century, Western Judaism faced the danger of becoming more of a sect and less of a living faith. In France, Napoleon had convened a ‘Sanhedrin’ of Jewish notables programmed to give conformist answers, in accordance with the pattern of state-dominated Consistories into which he pressed both Church and Synagogue (1806).
But alternative patterns also developed. Almost from the beginning, Orthodoxy found its spokesmen in great scholars like Moses Sofer of Pressburg (1763-1839). Against the rejection of the Oral Law, which now viewed the T almud and the later Responsa historically rather than theologically, traditionalism found ways ofpreserving the ‘chain of tradition’ connecting modernjewry with the exponents of the Torah through the centuries. And there was also a median way, espoused by Zarachiah Frankel (1801-75), called ‘Historical Judaism’, which accepted the need for change and the principle of Progressive Revelation but strove for a minimum of new additions and a maximum of links with the historic Jewish community and its teachings. Freedom of inquiry was granted, but the collective experience and observances of the Jewish people were not to be rejected.Germany was the place for radical Reform, born out of political circumstances as much as out of the presence of a group of scholarly and progressive rabbis ready to storm the heavens. England, by contrast, moved slowly and cautiously. The beginning of its Reform movement was more a rebellion against an old autocracy than a radical shift in theology. However, by the middle of the nineteenth century, the West London Synagogue became a centre for a Reform movement which established its ideology along with its changes in ritual. And, with the turn of the century, the more radical Liberal movement, still building upon a radical, rational and optimistic pattern already crumbling in Europe, brought to the fore a group of new teachers such as Lily Montagu, Israel Mattuck and C.G. Montefiore. Traditional Judaism, centred upon the Chief Rabbinate and its Seminary (Jews’ College, founded 1855), maintained its leadership then as now. Yet the ‘progressive’ community became a dynamic and growing element in Anglo-Jewish life; and Liberal and Reform eventually joined in establishing the Leo Baeck College in 1956 (see below). The full development of Progressive Judaism can only be seen by examining the growth of American Jewry, where all aspects of Jewish life have discovered new life for themselves over the past 150 years.
More on the topic Progressive Judaism: the First Phase:
- Progressive Judaism: the First Phase
- The History of Judaism
- The Formative Phase
- A Three-Phase Career
- Chronic Progressive Nephropathy