<<
>>

Diya between shari'a and customary law

The shari'a courts did not act in this case, according to Shaykh Tamimi, because the victims’ families did not file a claim. Diya claims are processed at the shari'a court only upon the filing of a claim by the victim or victim’s family; the shari'a court does not get involved in the process of appointing arbiters, but requires prior proof of guilt before issuing a ruling for an amount of diya.

The role of the shari'a court ends after the ruling has been issued. After the shari'a court has made its ruling for payment due, procedures are activated in the regular court system (at the criminal court) for execution of the ruling. The offender must pay within thirty days of the date of the judgment. The amount of diya that is awarded by the shari'a courts in the West Bank for the victim is the same amount for both female and male, according to Tamimi. This represents a positive de­velopment, mirrored elsewhere including, it appears, in some customary practices in the region, from the ‘classical’ rules of fiqh which generally appear to have held the diya for a woman to be half that of a man.56

The families of the victims of the Hebron factory fire, however, chose to implement principles of diya through customary law processes and did not file claim at the shari'a court. The Deputy Qadi al-Quda was consulted only about the amount of diya payable, his answer being, as noted above, that the full diya worth 4.5 kg gold was payable for each of the female victims. Given that the jaha subsequently decided that only half the full diya was payable, it is possible that had the victims had recourse to the shari'a court and a different process, they might have received a ruling for the full diya which would then theoretically be executable in the regular court system.

<< | >>
Source: Welchman Lynn. Women's Rights and Islamic Family Law: Perspectives on Reform. Zed Books,2004. — 328 p.. 2004
More legal literature on Laws.Studio

More on the topic Diya between shari'a and customary law:

  1. APPENDIX Case history: Diya between shari,a and customary law
  2. Customary law: lives at half value?
  3. Customary Law and Personal Law
  4. The Shari'a: Islamic Law
  5. A resurgence of traditional authority and customary law
  6. Attitudes towards shari'a law
  7. Other Actors: Widening the Scope Traditional Leadership and Customary Law in Capitalist Liberal Democracies in Africa
  8. The shari'a family law survey
  9. Women and Shari'a Law
  10. The Type of Islamic Law Implemented in UK Shari’a Councils and Muslim Arbitration Tribunal
  11. Regulation on the organization of shari'a courts issued in accordance with Law Decree no. 78 of 1931
  12. PRACTICAL CONSEQUENCES OF LEGAL DUALISM AND MONISM IN THE APPLICATION OF SHARI’AH FAMILY LAW TODAY IN AUSTRALIA AND SINGAPORE
  13. SIX Legal context: shari,a courts and Muslim family law in the transitional period
  14. Qadis and muftis play an essential role in realizing the duty to ensure justice in this world and salvation in the next through interpreting, adapting and implementing the mandates of Islamic sacred law (Shari ‘ah) for the community of believers and in its name.
  15. Shari'a courts: jurisdiction and laws
  16. Shari'ah and custom in the formative period