The Oslo peace process: law and transition
In September 1993, the Declaration of Principles, signed by Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization, formally kicked off the ‘interim’ or ‘transitional’ phase of the so-called Oslo peace process.
In May 1994, the signing of the Israel- PLO Gaza-Jericho Agreement paved the way for Yasser Arafat’s triumphal return to Gaza in July to head the Palestinian Authority, and for the incremental transfer from the Israeli occupation authorities to the Authority of a range of civil functions and responsibilities in Gaza and Jericho, including administration of the courts. With the signing of the ‘Interim Agreement’ the following year, the ‘transitional’ period became formally underway in the rest of the West Bank as well (although not, according to the texts, in occupied East Jerusalem). The transitional period was stipulated to come to an end five years after the signing of the Gaza-Jericho Agreement on 4 May 2000, when final status negotiations should be concluded.The flaws in the agreements,22 in particular the avoidance of the discourse of rights and the rule of international law, could not but have consequences both for people’s lives and livelihoods in the transitional period and possibly the future, but also for the perception and potential of efforts at rights-based legal reform, as discussed in the following chapter. Chapter 7 also discusses the activity of the Palestinian Legislative Council, elected in 1996, and in particular the history of the draft Basic Law. The progression of the Basic Law’s provisions on the place of shari'a (as a source of law) and of the function of the shari'a court courts is illustrative of differing aspirations and expectations on the part of drafters, legislators and different sectors of civil society. These points, and the advocacy efforts around personal status law launched by sections of the women’s movement and NGOs, are considered later in this case study. The remainder of this chapter reviews actions and initiatives taken by leading members of the shar'i establishment during the same period.
More on the topic The Oslo peace process: law and transition:
- The Oslo transition: advocacy and protest
- The Troubled Transition to 30 Years of Peace
- The peace process, its collapse and attempts to revive it
- What is the Steinmeier Formula, and why did it become a stumbling block in the peace process?
- Part Il Islamic Law and the Transition to Palestinian Statehood: Constraints and Opportunities for Legal Reform
- The Role of Local Bureaucrats in the Law-making Process
- Pre-Oslo agents of political mobilization
- § THIS chapter examines the strategies of the Palestinian women’s movement, particularly its equality strategy, in the post-Oslo period.
- The Peace to End all Peace?
- BJ0RNAR YTREHUS AND TURID VIK0REN Norwegian Veterinary Institute, Oslo, Norway
- What We Do and Do not Know About the Jomon- Yayoi Transition
- Kari R. Lybeck[‡], Girum T. Tessema, Annette H. Kampen, Berit Djonne and Angelika Agdestein Norwegian Veterinary Institute, Oslo, Norwa
- Transition to Inpatient PFCC