REFERENCES

1. Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Gulmezoglu AM, et al. Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007-08. Lancet 2010;375:490-99.

2. Crowther CA, Dodd JM, Hiller JE, Haslam RR, Robinson JS, Birth After Caesarean Study Group. Planned vaginal birth or elective repeat caesarean: patient preference restricted cohort with nested randomised trial. PLoS Med 2012;9: e1001192.

3. Greene RA, Fitzpatrick C, Turner MJ. What are the maternal implications of a classical caesarean section? J Obstet Gynaecol 1998;18:345-57.

4. Guise JM, Berlin M, McDonagh M, Osterweil P, Chan B, Helfand M. Safety of vaginal birth after cesarean: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:420-29.

5. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Birth after Previous Caesarean Birth. Green-top Guideline No. 45. London: RCOG; 2015.

6. Anim-Somuah M, Smyth R, Howell C. Epidural versus nonepidural or no analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;4:CD000331.

7. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Operative vaginal delivery. ACOG Practice Bull 2000;17:1-6.

8. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Operative Vaginal Delivery. Green-top Guideline No. 26. London: RCOG; 2011.

9. Chung MY, Wan OY, Cheung RY, Chung TK, Chan SS. Prevalence of levator ani muscle injury and health-related quality of life in primiparous Chinese women after instrumental delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015;45:728-33.

10. Gurol-Urganci I, Cromwell DA, Edozien LC, et al. Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears among primiparous women in England between 2000 and 2012: time trends and risk factors. BJOG 2013;120:1516-25.

11. de Vogel J, van der Leeuw-van Beek A, Gietelink D, et al. The ef­fect of a mediolateral episiotomy during operative vaginal delivery on the risk of developing obstetrical anal sphincter injuries.

12. De Leeuw JW, Vierhout ME, Struijk PC, Hop WC, Wallenburg HC. Anal sphincter damage after vaginal delivery: functional out­come and risk factors for fecal incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2001;80:830-34.

13. Stedenfeldt M, Pirhonen J, Blix E, Wilsgaard T, Vonen B, 0ian P. Episiotomy characteristics and risks for obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a case-control study. BJOG 2012;119:724-30.

14. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Intrapartum Care: Care of Healthy Women and their Babies during Childbirth. Clinical guideline [CG55]. London: NICE; 2007.

15. Sultan AH. Obstetric perineal injury and anal incontinence. Clin Risk 1999;5:193-96.

16. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The Management of Third- and Fourth-Degree Perineal Tears. Green­top Guideline No. 29. London: RCOG; 2015.

17. Mahony R, Behan M, Daly L, Kirwan C, O’Herlihy C, O’Connell PR. Internal anal sphincter defect influences continence outcome following obstetric anal sphincter injury. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;196:217.e1-5.

18. Fernando RJ, Sultan AH, Kettle C, Thakar R. Methods of repair for obstetric anal sphincter injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;12:CD002866.

19. Aflaifel N, Weeks A. Push, pull, squeeze, clamp: 100 years of changes in the management of the third stage of labour as de­scribed by ten teachers. BMJ 2012;345:e8270.

20. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). External Cephalic Version (ECV) and Reducingthe Incidence ofBreech Presentation. Green-top Guideline No. 20a. London: RCOG; 2006.

21. Suen SS, Khaw KS, Law LW, et al. The force applied to success­fully turn a foetus during reattempts of external cephalic version is substantially reduced when performed under spinal analgesia. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012;25:719-22.

22. Khaw KS, Lee SW, Ngan Kee WD, et al. Randomized trial of an­aesthetic interventions in external cephalic version for breech presentation.

23. Lau TK, Lo KW, Leung TY, Fok WY, Rogers MS. Outcome of la­bour after successful external cephalic version at term complicated by isolated transient fetal bradycardia. BJOG 2000;107:401-405.

24. Leung KT, Suen SS, Sahota DS, Lau TK, Leung TY. External ceph­alic version does not increase the risk of intrauterine death: a 17­year experience and literature review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 25:1774-78.

25. Chan LY, Tang JL, Tsoi KF, Fok WY, Chan LW, Lau TK. Intrapartum cesarean delivery after successful external cephalic version: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104:155-60.

26. Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, et al. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomized multicentre trial. Lancet 2000;356:1375-83.

27. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The Management ofBreech Presentation. Green-top Guideline No. 20b. London: RCOG; 2006.

28. Berhan Y, Haileamlak A. The risks ofplanned vaginal breech delivery versus planned caesarean section for term breech birth: a meta-ana- lysis including observational studies BJOG 2016;123:49-57.