There are differences in the approach, acceptance, and management of the upper limb amputee versus the lower-extremity amputee.
The upper limb prosthesis does not replace the sensory function of the hand and is best used as a mechanical tool (76). The hand is used to explore the environment and to manipulate objects within it. The hand needs to reach the body and precisely approach an object, grasp, and then release it. Acceptance of the prosthesis is variable (77). Frequently, the exposed skin of a deficient limb is preferable to an encased limb. Stump sensation may even be enhanced to compensate for the loss of prehensile area (78).
More medical literature on Medic.Studio
More on the topic There are differences in the approach, acceptance, and management of the upper limb amputee versus the lower-extremity amputee.:
- There are differences in the approach, acceptance, and management of the upper limb amputee versus the lower-extremity amputee.
- Deficiencies of the lower limb are less frequent than deficiencies of the upper limb, but surgical and rehabilitation management may be more involved.
- Uncommon Lower-Limb Deficiencies
- Phantom Sensation
- Banker's acceptance
- Commonly Acquired Lower-Limb Amputations in Children
- Management of Limb Contractures and Deformity
- TECHNICAL FACTORS OF NEEDLE ELECTROMYOGRAPHY
- Release
- Sectorial differences in TFP
-
Infectious diseases -
Internal diseases -
Obstetrics and Gynaecology -
Pediatrics -
Veterinary medicine -
-
Conflictology -
Ecology -
Economy -
Finance -
History -
Law -
Medicine -
Philosophy -
Religious studies -