<<
>>

There are differences in the approach, acceptance, and management of the upper limb amputee versus the lower-extremity amputee.

The upper limb prosthesis does not replace the sensory function of the hand and is best used as a mechanical tool (76). The hand is used to explore the environment and to manipulate objects within it. The hand needs to reach the body and pre­cisely approach an object, grasp, and then release it. Acceptance of the prosthesis is variable (77). Frequently, the exposed skin of a deficient limb is preferable to an encased limb. Stump sensation may even be enhanced to compensate for the loss of prehensile area (78).

<< | >>
Source: Alexander M.A., Matthews D.J.. Pediatric Rehabilitation: Principles and Practice. 4 th. åd. — New York: Demos Medical Publishing,2010. — 540 ð.. 2010
More medical literature on Medic.Studio

More on the topic There are differences in the approach, acceptance, and management of the upper limb amputee versus the lower-extremity amputee.:

  1. There are differences in the approach, acceptance, and management of the upper limb amputee versus the lower-extremity amputee.
  2. Deficiencies of the lower limb are less frequent than deficiencies of the upper limb, but surgical and reha­bilitation management may be more involved.
  3. Uncommon Lower-Limb Deficiencies
  4. Phantom Sensation
  5. Banker's acceptance
  6. Commonly Acquired Lower-Limb Amputations in Children
  7. Management of Limb Contractures and Deformity
  8. TECHNICAL FACTORS OF NEEDLE ELECTROMYOGRAPHY
  9. Release
  10. Sectorial differences in TFP