<<
>>

Contents

Introduction, ix

PART I: EVIDENCE AND INDUCTION

1 Concepts of Evidence, 3

2 Why Philosophical Theories of Evidence Are (and Ought to Be) Ignored by Scientists, 34

3 The Grue Paradox, 47

4 The War on Induction: Whewell Takes on Newton and Mill (Norton Takes on Everyone), 61

5 Waves and the Scientific Method, 85

PART II: EXPLANATION

6 An Illocutionary Theory of Explanation, 103

7 The Pragmatic Character of Explanation, 123

8 Can There Be a Model of Explanation?, 143

9 Explanation versus Prediction: Which Carries More Weight?, 168

10 Function Statements, 181

PART III: REALISM, MOLECULES, AND ELECTRONS

11 Is There a Valid Experimental Argument for Scientific Realism?, 211

12 Jean Perrin and Molecular Reality, 237

13 The Problem of Theoretical Terms, 266

14 What to Do If You Want to Defend a Theory You Can't Prove: A Method of “Physical Speculation”, 286

15 Who Really Discovered the Electron?, 309

This page intentionally left blank

<< | >>
Source: Achinstein P.. Evidence, Explanation, and Realism: Essays in Philosophy of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press,2010. — 344 p.. 2010

More on the topic Contents:

  1. CONTENTS
  2. Contents
  3. Contents
  4. Harker C., Horschelmann K. (Eds.). Conflict, Violence and Peace. Springer,2017. — 456 p., 2017
  5. Reviewers
  6. Abel A.B., Bernanke B., Croushore D.. Macroeconomics. 10th Edition, Global Edition. — Pearson,2021. — 690 pp., 2021
  7. Bibliography
  8. Introduction
  9. Cohran P.E.. Veterinary Anatomy and Physiology. 2 edition. Delmar,2011. - 421 p., 2011
  10. Barnes Thomas G., Boyer Allen D.. Shaping the Common Law: From Glanvill to Hale, 1188-1688. Stanford Law Books,2008. — 304 p., 2008