<<
>>

Achinstein P.. Evidence, Explanation, and Realism: Essays in Philosophy of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press,2010. — 344 p.. 2010

The essays in this volume address three fundamental questions in the philosophy of science: What is required for some fact to be evidence for a scientific hypothesis? What does it mean to say that a scientist or a theory explains a phenomenon? Should scientific theories that postulate "unobservable" entities such as electrons be construed realistically as aiming to correctly describe a world underlying what is directly observable, or should such theories be understood as aiming to correctly describe only the observable world? Distinguished philosopher of science Peter Achinstein provides answers to each of these questions in essays written over a period of more than 40 years. The present volume brings together his important previously published essays, allowing the reader to confront some of the most basic and challenging issues in the philosophy of science, and to consider Achinstein's many influential contributions to the solution of these issues. He presents a theory of evidence that relates this concept to probability and explanation; a theory of explanation that relates this concept to an explaining act as well as to the different ways in which explanations are to be evaluated; and an empirical defense of scientific realism that invokes both the concept of evidence and that of explanation.

<< | >>
Part I EVIDENCE AND INDUCTION
Why Philosophical Theories of Evidence Are (and Ought to Be) Ignored by Scientists
The Grue Paradox
The War on Induction
Whewell Takes on Newton and Mill (Norton Takes on Everyone)
Waves and the Scientific Method
Part II EXPLANATION
An Illocutionary Theory of Explanation
The Pragmatic Character of Explanation
Can There Be a Model of Explanation?
Explanation versus Prediction
10 Function Statements
Part III REALISM, MOLECULES, AND ELECTRONS
11 IS THERE A VALID EXPERIMENTAL ARGUMENT FOR SCIENTIFIC REALISM?
12 Jean Perrin and Molecular Reality
14 What to Do if You Want to Defend a Theory You Can't Prove
15 Who Really Discovered the Electron?

Books and textbooks on the discipline Philosophy of Science and Technology:

  1. Allen B.. Empiricisms: Experience and Experiment from Antiquity to the Anthropocene. Oxford University Press,2021. — 527 p. - 2021 ãîä
  2. Alger Bradley E.. Defense of the Scientific Hypothesis: From Reproducibility Crisis to Big Data. Oxford University Press,2020. — 449 p. - 2020 ãîä
  3. Achinstein P.. Speculation: Within and about Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press,2019. — 297 p. - 2019 ãîä
  4. Aguirre A., Foster B., Merali Z. (Eds.). What is Fundamental? Springer,2019. — 189 p. - 2019 ãîä
  5. Agazzi E. (ed.). Varieties of Scientific Realism: Objectivity and Truth in Science. Springer,2017. — 411 pp. - 2017 ãîä
  6. Alai M., Buzzoni M., Tarozzi G. (eds.). Science Between Truth and Ethical Responsibility: Evandro Agazzi in the Contemporary Scientific and Philosophical Debate. Springer,2015. — 337 pp. - 2015 ãîä
  7. Ackermann R.J.. Data, Instruments, and Theory: A Dialectical Approach to Understanding Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press,2014. — 230 p. - 2014 ãîä
  8. Allhoff F.. Philosophies of the Sciences: A Guide. N.-Y.: Wiley-Blackwell,2010. — 386 p. - 2010 ãîä
  9. Agassi Joseph. Science in Flux. Springer,1975. — 559 p. - 1975 ãîä