Bovine Tuberculosis in Uganda
BTB is a chronic infectious disease caused by M. bovis that mostly affects ungulates (OIE 2009). Nearly all warm-blooded animals can be infected by M. bovis, following which they develop clinical signs of BTB.
In Uganda, this disease affects humans, cattle, goats, sheep, pigs, and a number of wildlife species including African buffaloes (Syncerus coffer), greater kudus (Tragelaphus strepsiceros), warthogs (Phacochoerus africanus), and lions (Panthera leo) (Muwonge et al. 2012a; Kalema-Zikusoka et al. 2005; Oloya et al. 2008). This section explores our current understanding and the status of BTB in Ugandan livestock, humans, and wildlife and its socioeconomic impact.22.3.1 Historical Overview
The history of any mycobacterial disease is dependent on how pathogens and different disease conditions evolved over time in response to changing population structures and the environment. Human TB, leprosy, and Buruli ulcer dominated the history of diseases caused by the genus Mycobacterium in Uganda (Daniel 1998, 2006). The control of these diseases effectively started in the 1960s after Uganda’s independence, but efforts were halted by the civil unrest that plagued the country from 1966 to 1986 (Ministry of Health 1992). Studies conducted during these turbulent times estimated the average prevalence of BTB to be 22% in cattle (Nyakahuma and Kimezire 1995). For a disease known to have been present in Uganda since the early 1900s (Opuda-Asibo 1995), it is only recently that the holes in our knowledge are slowly being patched by comprehensive epidemiological and socio-anthropological studies. The majority of these studies have shown that BTB is most prevalent in the UCC (Oloya et al. 2007a; Inangolet et al. 2008; Muwonge et al. 2012a; Asiimwe et al. 2009; Nasaka 2014).
22.3.2 Diagnostic Challenges
Making an accurate diagnosis is an important component of BTB control and management in animals, but, as is the case with human TB (Mwinga 2005; Sharma et al.
2012), it remains an extremely challenging process. Uganda does not have an official national BTB control program, and it is important to reflect on the following points when interpreting and/or evaluating diagnostics results especially in a resource-poor country like Uganda:• Currently, not a single test fulfills all the criteria necessary to identify all BTB-infected animals (Strain et al. 2011),
• The effectiveness of a diagnostic test depends on the ability (dependent on the objectives) of the test to correctly identify animals at different stages of the disease (Nielsen et al. 2011), i.e., exposed, infected, infectious (present an immediate threat), and animals with clinical disease.
• Finally, the intervention that will follow and resources available influence the choice of test.
Unlike in developed countries where the life span of animals is shorter due to a younger slaughter age, in Ugandan cattle, the life span is substantially longer. This means that there is a higher likelihood of detecting infected animals at slaughter as a longer life span favors the progression of a chronic disease and the likelihood of becoming infected. In such settings, animals are expected to remain infectious for a longer duration (Strain et al. 2011; Shittu et al. 2013).
If Uganda were to adopt a comprehensive BTB control policy, the choice of tools would have to take these features into consideration. Since Uganda does not have a structured BTB control policy, the diagnostic and prevalence data of BTB presented in this section are results of academic research projects and are not based on statutorily sanctioned BTB surveillance programs and diagnostic techniques.
22.3.3 Ante-mortal and Postmortem Inspection for Bovine Tuberculosis in Livestock
Ante-mortal diagnosis of BTB is difficult due to the lack of specific diagnostic clinical signs. Due to an absence of BTB surveillance programs using the intradermal tuberculin test, most M. bovis-infected cattle in Uganda will live their entire life without being tested for BTB.
For this reason, the first opportunity for detecting BTB is usually at municipal abattoirs during meat inspection (Oloya et al. 2006; Muwonge et al. 2012a; Asiimwe et al. 2009). Because animals are also slaughtered illegally, an unknown but probably a considerable number of BTB cases are never detected or the presence of the disease reported (Kankya et al. 2010).At slaughter, BTB presents with nodular, granulomatous tubercles, predominantly localized in anatomical sites reflecting the route of transmission (OIE
2009). In pigs, lesions have predominately been observed in the abdominal lymph nodes (Muwonge et al. 2012a), while in cattle they occur in both pulmonary and extrapulmonary lymph nodes (Muwonge et al. 2012a; Asiimwe et al. 2009). Recent unpublished data also indicated that goats had extrapulmonary tuberculous lesions especially in the mesenteric lymph nodes from which M. bovis was isolated (Nalapa et al. 2015, unpublished data).
One of the greatest shortcomings of postmortem inspection is its low sensitivity for the detection of gross BTB (tuberculous) lesions, making it impossible to detect a significant number of animals infected with and containing lesions of BTB (En0e et al. 2003; Murray 1986). According to similar studies conducted in Uganda, postmortem inspection for BTB had a sensitivity of only 37% (Muwonge et al. 2012a, b).
22.3.4 Tuberculin Test
Screening for BTB is both qualitative and quantitative. In Uganda, screening has been based on the comparative intradermal test (CCT) using 0.1 ml of purified bovine and avian tuberculin (purified protein derivative or PPD) injections, at a concentration of 20,000 UCT/ml. After 72 hours, an increase of >4 mm in skin thickness at the M. bovis tuberculin injection site, and if in excess of the increase in the thickness of the skin at the site of the M. avium tuberculin injection, is considered positive for BTB.
The lack of the ability to control TB due to M. bovis in Uganda is a hole caused by the lack of sufficient nation-wide data to provide a reliable estimate of the extent of the problem to guide the decision-making process. In the last decade, only ten reports have been published on the occurrence of tuberculosis in Uganda, most providing information about the prevalence of BTB in districts in the UCC. According to these reports, the prevalence of BTB in cattle, based on the tuberculin skin test, ranges from 1.3% to 51.6% at herd level and 0.6%-13% at slaughter (Table 22.1) (Inangolet et al. 2008). It is critical to quantify the problem countrywide to allow an equitable allocation of resources for its control.
22.4
More on the topic Bovine Tuberculosis in Uganda:
- Molecular Epidemiology of Bovine Tuberculosis in Uganda
- Policy Provisions for Bovine and Zoonotic Tuberculosis in Uganda
- Tuberculosis Caused by M. bovis in Humans in Uganda
- Bovine Tuberculosis
- Chapter 22 Holes and Patches: An Account of Tuberculosis Caused by Mycobacterium bovis in Uganda
- Bovine Tuberculosis Control Programs in South Africa
- Bovine Tuberculosis in Zambian Wildlife
- 8.3 Bovine Tuberculosis in African Cattle Populations
- Bovine Tuberculosis in African Wildlife Species
- Bovine Tuberculosis in Malawi
- Chapter 23 Bovine Tuberculosis in Zambia
- Diagnosis of Bovine Tuberculosis in Zambia
- The Status of Bovine Tuberculosis in Sudan
- Chapter 18 Bovine Tuberculosis in Rwanda
- Control of Bovine Tuberculosis in Malawi