<<
>>

Diagnostics for MAC

The following section focuses on diagnostic tools and classification schemes that are typically em­ployed for members of the MAC. How these tests do, and do not, aid in the identification of MAP is reviewed.

More detailed information on the specif­ic isolation and identification of MAP is discussed in greater detail elsewhere (see Chapter 18, this volume).

5.3.1 Culture and traditional methods for classification of MAC

Definitive diagnosis of a mycobacterial infection requires culture of the organism from a clinical specimen, followed by identification using estab­lished techniques. Both liquid and solid (agar- or egg-based) media can be used for mycobacterial culture. However, no single medium or growth condition will permit the successful isolation of all mycobacteria and therefore protocols may vary between laboratories. Mycobacterium intra- cellulare and the classical M. avium strains can grow on any standard mycobacterial media, with or without 10% CO2. While the MAC grows well at 3 7°C incubation, M. avium strains may grow best at an increased temperature of 40­4 2 °C (Kent and Kubica, 1985). MAC requires >7 days for growth and 3-4 weeks to reach ma­turity. Mycobacterial cultures are typically kept up to 6-8 weeks before being considered nega­tive. However, these standard conditions are insufficient for routine isolation of MAP. The organism’s extremely slow growth rate and re­quirement for mycobactin supplementation pre­clude detection. Even when present in immense quantities, it can take several months to detect MAP in the clinical setting (Richter et al., 2002).

Traditionally, speciation of non- tuberculous mycobacteria was based on phe­notypic characteristics such as pigmentation, growth rate, growth temperature and bio­chemical activities. The MAC is considered non­pigmented, although some strains may present with bright yellow pigmentation (e.g.

M. vuln- eris and M. arosiense) and ageing cultures may adopt yellow hues. The MAC can also present with various colony morphologies (i.e. smooth or rough) and grow under wide ranges of tem­perature and pH. The MAC is typically differenti­ated from other species of the Group III, slowly growing, non-photochromogenic mycobacteria by a positive tellurite test and negative results for urease and Tween hydrolysis (Kent and Kubica, 1985). As discussed above, phenotypic distinc­tion of MAC species is difficult and, owing to their similarity in clinical settings, identification to the complex level was generally considered sufficient. Notably, the classification algorithms used in clinical microbiology laboratories do not include MAP, because it is commonly not con­sidered as a human pathogen.

For decades, serotyping was used for clas­sification of MAC strains. Together, M. avium and M. intracellulare comprise 28 different se- rovars (Saito et al., 1990; Wayne et al., 1993). Serotyping relies on the presence of serovar- specific glycopeptidolipids (GPLs) (Brennan et al., 19 78; Brennan and Goren, 19 79). MAP isolates do not produce GPLs and therefore can­not be serotyped. However, this is not a diagnos­tically useful characteristic since GPL mutants of M. avium (Belisle et al., 1993) and other non- serotypeable MAC clones (De Smet et al., 1996) are also encountered. Skilled technicians can also use high-performance liquid chromatog­raphy (HPLC) of mycolic acids to successfully separate some MAC species (Butler et al., 1992), but differentiation of MAP from other M. avium subspecies is not possible (Dei et al., 1999).

Matrix-associated laser desorption/ioniza- tion-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI- TOF MS) has become a routine method for bacterial identification. This method can distin­guish M. avium from M. intracellulare, but com­mercial MALDI-TOF databases do not contain profiles for all validated species, nor are all spe­cies and subspecies of MAC typically evaluated in published studies.

Despite promising work on the differentiation of M. chimaera from M. intra­cellulare (Pranada etal., 2017), MALDI-TOF does not yet allow reliable identification of most MAC organisms at the species level (Brown-Elliott et al., 2019). Similarly, the clinical databases available for commercial MALDI-TOF systems do not allow reliable differentiation of MAP from other subspecies of M. avium, but subspecies­level identification may be possible via crea­tion and optimization of an in-house database (Ricchi et al., 2017).

5.3.2 DNA sequencing for the identification of MAC

DNA-based analysis, including WGS, confirms that the MAC includes more than M. avium and M. intracellulare. Most validated MAC species can be identified by targeted sequencing of the full-length 16S rRNA gene. The exceptions are M. intracellulare and M. paraintracellulare, and M. marseillense and M. yongonense (Tortoli et al., 2017). Additional targets, including ITSs, hsp65 and rpoB allow further differentiation of MAC species and subspecies. Within M. avium, eight ITS sequevars have been reported. Because MAP strains typically present with the Mav-A seque- var, ITSs cannot be used to distinguish them from other M. avium subspecies (Turenne et al., 2006). Similarly, the 441 base pair (BP) region at the 5' end of the hsp65 gene that is widely used for speciation of mycobacteria (Telenti et al., 1993) does not effectively differentiate M. avium subspecies. In contrast, the 3' ‘tail end’ of the hsp65 gene can simultaneously identify spe­cies as well as host-associated subtypes (Turenne et al., 2006). MAP is represented by two seque- vars, one for each of the MAP- C and Map- S lin­eages. Another hsp65 sequevar encompasses both of the bird-associated subspecies (i.e. subsp. avium and silvaticum together). rpoB sequencing is also capable of distinguishing among subspe­cies of M. avium, including MAP (Higgins et al., 2011).

5.3.3 Other molecular assays for detection or identification of MAC

A scheme based on three insertion sequences, IS1245, IS901 and IS900, has been used to de­fine the subspecies of M.

avium: IS901 is only present in avian strains (M. avium subsp. avium and M. avium subsp. silvaticum); IS900 is specific for MAP; IS 1245 is absent from MAP but present in all other subspecies (Ellingson et al., 2000; Bartos et al., 2006). Although not commercially available, hybridization-based methods (e.g. re­striction fragment-length polymorphisms) that target these elements can be used for subspe­cies identification as well as strain typing and surveillance. However, polymerase chain reac­tion (PCR)-based detection of these insertion sequences should be used with caution and veri­fied via DNA sequencing, since similar insertion elements exist throughout the MAC and in non­MAC organisms (Turenne et al., 2007).

A non-sequencing-based method for reli­able differentiation of M. avium subsp. silvaticum and M. avium subsp. avium has only recently been described. This high-resolution melt meth­od can detect differences as small as a single nu­cleotide polymorphism (Ronai et al., 2015).

5.3.4 Commercial assays for the identification of MAC

Genetic variation is the basis for a number of commercial assays currently available for the de­tection and/or speciation of mycobacteria. These tests offer rapid turnaround time and greater accuracy than conventional methods and thus contribute to improved patient care. Some of the first, introduced in the early 1990s and still used today, are the AccuProbe® Culture Identification Tests (Hologic) (Saito et al., 1989). Currently six tests are available for mycobacteria. Each targets ribosomal RNA and permits identification from a positive culture. In addition to individual tests for the M. tuberculosis complex, M. kansasii, M. gordonae, M. intracellulare and M. avium, there is a MAC test that can identify any MAC organ­ism to the complex level (Lebrun et al., 1992; Viljanen et al., 1993). However, on rare occa­sions the MAC test may cross-react with other mycobacteria (Tortoli et al., 2010). Because the target of AccuProbe is ribosomal RNA, this assay cannot distinguish MAP from other M.

avium subspecies. MAP generates a positive re­action using the MAC AccuProbe assay (Richter et al., 2002).

Reverse hybridization line probe assays (LPA) are also commercially available. In ad­dition to other non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), the Inno-LiPA® MYCOBACTERIA v2 (Fujirebio) can identify M. avium, two subsets of M. intracellulare and ‘MAIS complex' (Tortoli et al., 2003; Lebrun et al., 2005). However, the target is the ITS region, which does not permit resolution of MAP. Hain Lifescience markets sev­eral LPAs for mycobacteria. These detect species­specific 23S rDNA sequences. The GenoType® Mycobacteria Direct can be used for identifica­tion directly from clinical specimens, whereas the GenoType® Mycobacterium CM (Common Mycobacteria), AS (Additional Species) and NTM-DR (which can specifically identify M. chi­maera) tests require positive cultures. The Speed- oligo Mycobacteria assay (Vircell) is the latest LPA that includes M. avium and M. intracellulare. It targets both the 16S rRNA gene and adjacent ITSs but performance evaluations are limited to date. Again, since these LPAs target the riboso­mal operon, none has the capacity to differenti­ate MAP from other M. avium.

5.4

<< | >>
Source: Behr Marcel A., Stevenson K., Kapur V. (eds.). Paratuberculosis: Organism, Disease, Control. 2nd edition. — CAB International,2020. — 439 p.. 2020
More medical literature on Medic.Studio

More on the topic Diagnostics for MAC:

  1. Diagnostics
  2. Dismantling the primacy of shamanism: Mac Linscott Ricketts
  3. The Beginnings of Violence and Conflict: The Rise of the Mac
  4. Introduction
  5. Environmental Reservoir of the Mycobacterium avium Complex
  6. The Nguyen-Trinh Divide: A Civil War Subdivides
  7. Mycobacterium Avium Complex Infection
  8. Concluding Remarks
  9. 1,25(OH)2D3-VDR Mediated Transcriptional Regulation of Immune Related Genes
  10. Gotthelf Louis N.. Small Animal Ear Diseases: An Illustrated Guide. 2nd ed. — Saunders,2004. — 384 p., 2004
  11. The Natural Aspect of “Fever”
  12. Lymphoreticular System
  13. Molecular Epidemiology of M. bovis in Humans and Other Hosts in Africa
  14. Fibromyalgia
  15. Specific Strategies for Successfully Marketing Preventive and Therapeutic Ear Care
  16. DIAGNOSIS
  17. Coxiella burnetii Infection