Diagnostics for MAC
The following section focuses on diagnostic tools and classification schemes that are typically employed for members of the MAC. How these tests do, and do not, aid in the identification of MAP is reviewed.
More detailed information on the specific isolation and identification of MAP is discussed in greater detail elsewhere (see Chapter 18, this volume).5.3.1 Culture and traditional methods for classification of MAC
Definitive diagnosis of a mycobacterial infection requires culture of the organism from a clinical specimen, followed by identification using established techniques. Both liquid and solid (agar- or egg-based) media can be used for mycobacterial culture. However, no single medium or growth condition will permit the successful isolation of all mycobacteria and therefore protocols may vary between laboratories. Mycobacterium intra- cellulare and the classical M. avium strains can grow on any standard mycobacterial media, with or without 10% CO2. While the MAC grows well at 3 7°C incubation, M. avium strains may grow best at an increased temperature of 404 2 °C (Kent and Kubica, 1985). MAC requires >7 days for growth and 3-4 weeks to reach maturity. Mycobacterial cultures are typically kept up to 6-8 weeks before being considered negative. However, these standard conditions are insufficient for routine isolation of MAP. The organism’s extremely slow growth rate and requirement for mycobactin supplementation preclude detection. Even when present in immense quantities, it can take several months to detect MAP in the clinical setting (Richter et al., 2002).
Traditionally, speciation of non- tuberculous mycobacteria was based on phenotypic characteristics such as pigmentation, growth rate, growth temperature and biochemical activities. The MAC is considered nonpigmented, although some strains may present with bright yellow pigmentation (e.g.
M. vuln- eris and M. arosiense) and ageing cultures may adopt yellow hues. The MAC can also present with various colony morphologies (i.e. smooth or rough) and grow under wide ranges of temperature and pH. The MAC is typically differentiated from other species of the Group III, slowly growing, non-photochromogenic mycobacteria by a positive tellurite test and negative results for urease and Tween hydrolysis (Kent and Kubica, 1985). As discussed above, phenotypic distinction of MAC species is difficult and, owing to their similarity in clinical settings, identification to the complex level was generally considered sufficient. Notably, the classification algorithms used in clinical microbiology laboratories do not include MAP, because it is commonly not considered as a human pathogen.For decades, serotyping was used for classification of MAC strains. Together, M. avium and M. intracellulare comprise 28 different se- rovars (Saito et al., 1990; Wayne et al., 1993). Serotyping relies on the presence of serovar- specific glycopeptidolipids (GPLs) (Brennan et al., 19 78; Brennan and Goren, 19 79). MAP isolates do not produce GPLs and therefore cannot be serotyped. However, this is not a diagnostically useful characteristic since GPL mutants of M. avium (Belisle et al., 1993) and other non- serotypeable MAC clones (De Smet et al., 1996) are also encountered. Skilled technicians can also use high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) of mycolic acids to successfully separate some MAC species (Butler et al., 1992), but differentiation of MAP from other M. avium subspecies is not possible (Dei et al., 1999).
Matrix-associated laser desorption/ioniza- tion-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI- TOF MS) has become a routine method for bacterial identification. This method can distinguish M. avium from M. intracellulare, but commercial MALDI-TOF databases do not contain profiles for all validated species, nor are all species and subspecies of MAC typically evaluated in published studies.
Despite promising work on the differentiation of M. chimaera from M. intracellulare (Pranada etal., 2017), MALDI-TOF does not yet allow reliable identification of most MAC organisms at the species level (Brown-Elliott et al., 2019). Similarly, the clinical databases available for commercial MALDI-TOF systems do not allow reliable differentiation of MAP from other subspecies of M. avium, but subspecieslevel identification may be possible via creation and optimization of an in-house database (Ricchi et al., 2017).5.3.2 DNA sequencing for the identification of MAC
DNA-based analysis, including WGS, confirms that the MAC includes more than M. avium and M. intracellulare. Most validated MAC species can be identified by targeted sequencing of the full-length 16S rRNA gene. The exceptions are M. intracellulare and M. paraintracellulare, and M. marseillense and M. yongonense (Tortoli et al., 2017). Additional targets, including ITSs, hsp65 and rpoB allow further differentiation of MAC species and subspecies. Within M. avium, eight ITS sequevars have been reported. Because MAP strains typically present with the Mav-A seque- var, ITSs cannot be used to distinguish them from other M. avium subspecies (Turenne et al., 2006). Similarly, the 441 base pair (BP) region at the 5' end of the hsp65 gene that is widely used for speciation of mycobacteria (Telenti et al., 1993) does not effectively differentiate M. avium subspecies. In contrast, the 3' ‘tail end’ of the hsp65 gene can simultaneously identify species as well as host-associated subtypes (Turenne et al., 2006). MAP is represented by two seque- vars, one for each of the MAP- C and Map- S lineages. Another hsp65 sequevar encompasses both of the bird-associated subspecies (i.e. subsp. avium and silvaticum together). rpoB sequencing is also capable of distinguishing among subspecies of M. avium, including MAP (Higgins et al., 2011).
5.3.3 Other molecular assays for detection or identification of MAC
A scheme based on three insertion sequences, IS1245, IS901 and IS900, has been used to define the subspecies of M.
avium: IS901 is only present in avian strains (M. avium subsp. avium and M. avium subsp. silvaticum); IS900 is specific for MAP; IS 1245 is absent from MAP but present in all other subspecies (Ellingson et al., 2000; Bartos et al., 2006). Although not commercially available, hybridization-based methods (e.g. restriction fragment-length polymorphisms) that target these elements can be used for subspecies identification as well as strain typing and surveillance. However, polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based detection of these insertion sequences should be used with caution and verified via DNA sequencing, since similar insertion elements exist throughout the MAC and in nonMAC organisms (Turenne et al., 2007).A non-sequencing-based method for reliable differentiation of M. avium subsp. silvaticum and M. avium subsp. avium has only recently been described. This high-resolution melt method can detect differences as small as a single nucleotide polymorphism (Ronai et al., 2015).
5.3.4 Commercial assays for the identification of MAC
Genetic variation is the basis for a number of commercial assays currently available for the detection and/or speciation of mycobacteria. These tests offer rapid turnaround time and greater accuracy than conventional methods and thus contribute to improved patient care. Some of the first, introduced in the early 1990s and still used today, are the AccuProbe® Culture Identification Tests (Hologic) (Saito et al., 1989). Currently six tests are available for mycobacteria. Each targets ribosomal RNA and permits identification from a positive culture. In addition to individual tests for the M. tuberculosis complex, M. kansasii, M. gordonae, M. intracellulare and M. avium, there is a MAC test that can identify any MAC organism to the complex level (Lebrun et al., 1992; Viljanen et al., 1993). However, on rare occasions the MAC test may cross-react with other mycobacteria (Tortoli et al., 2010). Because the target of AccuProbe is ribosomal RNA, this assay cannot distinguish MAP from other M.
avium subspecies. MAP generates a positive reaction using the MAC AccuProbe assay (Richter et al., 2002).Reverse hybridization line probe assays (LPA) are also commercially available. In addition to other non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), the Inno-LiPA® MYCOBACTERIA v2 (Fujirebio) can identify M. avium, two subsets of M. intracellulare and ‘MAIS complex' (Tortoli et al., 2003; Lebrun et al., 2005). However, the target is the ITS region, which does not permit resolution of MAP. Hain Lifescience markets several LPAs for mycobacteria. These detect speciesspecific 23S rDNA sequences. The GenoType® Mycobacteria Direct can be used for identification directly from clinical specimens, whereas the GenoType® Mycobacterium CM (Common Mycobacteria), AS (Additional Species) and NTM-DR (which can specifically identify M. chimaera) tests require positive cultures. The Speed- oligo Mycobacteria assay (Vircell) is the latest LPA that includes M. avium and M. intracellulare. It targets both the 16S rRNA gene and adjacent ITSs but performance evaluations are limited to date. Again, since these LPAs target the ribosomal operon, none has the capacity to differentiate MAP from other M. avium.
5.4
More on the topic Diagnostics for MAC:
- Diagnostics
- Dismantling the primacy of shamanism: Mac Linscott Ricketts
- The Beginnings of Violence and Conflict: The Rise of the Mac
- Introduction
- Environmental Reservoir of the Mycobacterium avium Complex
- The Nguyen-Trinh Divide: A Civil War Subdivides
- Mycobacterium Avium Complex Infection
- Concluding Remarks
- 1,25(OH)2D3-VDR Mediated Transcriptional Regulation of Immune Related Genes
- Gotthelf Louis N.. Small Animal Ear Diseases: An Illustrated Guide. 2nd ed. — Saunders,2004. — 384 p., 2004
- The Natural Aspect of “Fever”
- Lymphoreticular System
- Molecular Epidemiology of M. bovis in Humans and Other Hosts in Africa
- Fibromyalgia
- Specific Strategies for Successfully Marketing Preventive and Therapeutic Ear Care
- DIAGNOSIS
- Coxiella burnetii Infection