<<
>>

Bibliographical Essay

Works such as Jeremy Black's Maps and History: Constructing Images of the Past (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1997) clearly show how cartography has helped shape modernity. But while Black's study considers war, nationalism and geo-politics, the connection between geography and genocide is absent.

There are some studies which make explicit links between aspects of the Holocaust and geography. Notable is Robert Jan van Pelt and Deborah Dwork's Auschwitz: 1270 to the Present (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1996), a highly innovative exploration of the location of the Nazi death camp par excellence at a historic European crossroads, replete with maps illustrating how changing borders over time were a factor in determining the fate of millions. Excellent maps are also assets in other Holocaust or Holocaust-related studies, including Ray Brandon and Wendy Lower's The Shoah in Ukraine: History, Testimony, Memorialization (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2008) and Timothy Snyder's Bloodlands: Europe between Hitler and Stalin (London: Bodley Head, 2010), but minus considerations of how the disciplinary development of geography per se informed an increasingly toxic Ratzelian geopolitics.

However, there has been keen interest in recent studies of the impact of imperial collapse on Europe's borderlands and its people. Omer Bartov and Eric D. Weitz (eds.), Shatterzone of Empires: Coexistence and Violence in the German, Habsburg and Ottoman Borderlands (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2013) exemplifies the contemporary scholarship in the field, including a growing awareness of how and where genocide became a key vector of postimperial nation-building. That this also included Soviet ‘nation-building' is acutely developed in Terry Martin, ‘The Origins of Soviet Ethnic Cleansing', Journal of Modern History 70 (1998), 813-61. Martin's study is also exemplary in its situating of Soviet ethnic cleansing within a borderlands landscape which needs to be read as a whole, as well as disaggregated into discrete zones of violence.

While the broad, systemic picture of genocide in its relationships to historical time and geographical space is yet to be fully explored, there have been suggestive regional studies including of the Macedonia-Thrace arena. Henry R. Wilkinson, Maps and Politics: A Review of the Ethnographic Cartography of Macedonia (Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 1951) was a notable forerunner in assessing how competing, mythic and increasingly belligerent nationalist claims on territory were dependent on the creation of allegedly accurate, supporting ethnographic maps. More recently the subject has been brilliantly reconsidered in Ipek Yosmaoglu, Blood Ties: Religion, Violence and the Politics of Nationhood in Ottoman Macedonia, 1878-1906 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2014), not least in demonstrating the connecting threads between cartography and censuses and an ensuing mass violence.

Finally, for further, recent but significant intervention cross-relating genocide, the specific political geography of Macedonia-Thrace and modernity, see Raz Segal, ‘The Modern State: The Question of Genocide and Holocaust Scholarship', Journal of Genocide Research 20.1 (2018), 108-33, and Mark Levene, ‘“The Bulgarians Were the Worst!”: Reconsidering the Holocaust in Salonika within a Regional History of Mass Violence', in Giorgos Antoniou and A. Dirk Moses (eds.), The Holocaust in Greece (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018), pp. 36-57.

19

<< | >>
Source: Edwards Louise, Penn Nigel, Winter Jay (eds.). The Cambridge World History of Violence. Volume 4: 1800 to the Present. Cambridge University Press,2020. — 676 p.. 2020

More on the topic Bibliographical Essay:

  1. Bibliographical Essay
  2. Bibliographical Essay
  3. Bibliographical Essay
  4. Bibliographical Essay
  5. Bibliographical Essay
  6. Bibliographical Essay
  7. Bibliographical Essay
  8. Bibliographical Essay
  9. Bibliographical Essay
  10. Bibliographical Essay
  11. Bibliographical Essay
  12. Bibliographical Essay
  13. Bibliographical Essay
  14. Bibliographical Essay
  15. Bibliographical Essay