<<
>>

Bibliographical Essay

There are no studies of violence as shown in the arts produced in the Islamic lands 500­1500, despite the many depictions of it. Many good pictures and discussions of individual objects, including those showing violence, can be found in general surveys of the field.

The standard reference works are the two volumes on the earlier (pre-1250) and later (post- 1250) periods in the Pelican History of Art series: Richard Ettinghausen, Oleg Grabar and Marilyn Jenkins-Madina, Islamic Art and Architecture 650-1250 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003) and Sheila S. Blair and Jonathan M. Bloom, The Art and Architecture of Islam 1250-1800 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1994). Colour pictures of the major objects discussed here are also available in the volume published by Phaidon in their Art and Ideas series: Jonathan Bloom and Sheila Blair, Islamic Arts (London: Phaidon, 1997).

One should also consult Eleanor Sims, Peerless Images: Persian Painting and its Sources (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2002). It covers not only manuscript illustrations but also paintings on other types of objects, including murals, ceramics, metalwares and the like, although it is limited to greater Iran and Central Asia. In addition to a chronological overview, it offers a rare survey organised by theme. Topics such as razm -o bazm (fighting and feasting), the hero, and the illustration of texts allow readers to peruse images that often show violence across media and time.

Exhibition catalogues also offer good colour pictures of major works. Three of the most important for the discussion here are Sheila Canby et al., Court and Cosmos: The Great Age of the Seljuqs (New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2016); Linda Komaroff and Stefano Carboni (eds.), The Legacy of Genghis Khan: Courtly Art and Culture in Western Asia, 1256-1353 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2002); and David J. Roxburgh (ed.), Turks: A Journey of a Thousand Years, 600-1600 (London: Royal Academy of Arts, 2005).

All are multi-media, although the latter two have a heavy emphasis on manuscript painting. All also include illustrations of objects and sites that are related to the works in the exhibition. The first covers the arts produced in the middle period. The second treats the work made during the Mongol period in Iran, a particularly inventive era when a new visual language was created. The third takes a wide view of the Turks, including material that was produced from Central Asia across Iran to Anatolia.

Monographs offer more in-depth analysis of individual objects or manuscripts. Some are cited in the chapter for the individual works of art, but many of them are also covered in Jonathan Bloom and Sheila Blair (eds.), Grove Encyclopedia of Islamic Art and Architecture, 3 vols. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009) or at Grove Art on-line available through subcription at oxfordartonline.com. ArtStor, organised by the Mellon Foundation as the visual counterpart of Jstor, also offers good photographs, but again only through subscription. All readers should also consult the information available on museum websites. The one for the Metropolitan Museum of Art, for example, is easily searchable by various terms and also has an excellent timeline with essays on different aspects of Islamic art.

<< | >>
Source: Gordon Matthew, Kaeuper Richard, Zurndorfer Harriet (eds.). The Cambridge World History of Violence. Volume 2: AD 500-AD 1500. Cambridge University Press,2020. — 696 p.. 2020

More on the topic Bibliographical Essay:

  1. Bibliographical Essay
  2. Bibliographical Essay
  3. Bibliographical Essay
  4. Bibliographical Essay
  5. Bibliographical Essay
  6. Bibliographical Essay
  7. Bibliographical Essay
  8. Bibliographical Essay
  9. Bibliographical Essay
  10. Bibliographical Essay
  11. Bibliographical Essay
  12. Bibliographical Essay
  13. Bibliographical Essay
  14. Bibliographical Essay
  15. Bibliographical Essay
  16. Bibliographical Essay