In Closing
The city of Niigata’s lone skyscraper houses an organisation called the Economic Research Institute for Northeast Asia (ERINA).[611] This is Niigata’s flashiest venue, and fitting, therefore, that the consulates of the People’s Republic of China, the Russian Federation and the Republic of Korea have their offices on floors just above and below ERINA’s.
The challenge for ERINA’s ideas about the sea it overlooks - how best to invest Japanese capital in Russian oil exploration in Yakutsk, among others, or how best to transport landlocked Mongolian rare earth minerals to market - is not a matter of high-level political connections. Instead, it revolves around the degree of autonomy that municipalities all along the shores of this body of water can exercise as well as how much voice local and regional governments and municipalities can achieve. Moreover, ERINA consciously addresses the limitations that the outdated architecture of a defeated Japan and enduring Cold War mindset impose on this sea.The former governor of Niigata prefecture, Hirayama Ikuo, a respected economist at the Bank of Japan and now university president, explained some of these hurdles: ‘When ERINA wants to make a policy proposal, it has to go through five different desks at the Foreign Ministry (in Tokyo): Russia, China, South Korea, North Korea, and the United States. You can imagine what happens.’[612] Looked at differently, ERINA’s backers want to exploit resources and rely on the open possibility of the sea as a transport network. They view this body of water's connective tissue as primary for its surrounding lands ideally in which regional inhabitants would have greater control over policy direction and profit allocation. Regardless of the ultimate decision over this sea's name - or maybe as part of it - all who share its coastlines will want to determine a name for it that has connective meaning to it and to all of its life forms in order to hold the region together rather than further dividing it.
More on the topic In Closing:
- CONSTRUCTIVE COMMUNICATION
- Dialectics of Engaged Research
- Conclusion
- CONSTRUCTIVE COMMUNICATION RESEARCH
- FORM VERSUS SUBSTANCE: BOTH MATTER
- Ways to Build On the Unique Contributions of Qualitative Communication
- Abram Bergson and Welfare Economics
- Background and Context
- Preferred Outcome
- CLUSTERF**K!