Organizational Power III: Imperial Administrative Elites
The metropolitan administration quickly came to depend heavily upon Roman and Sasanian personnel. Although the settlement of the armies in new garrison camps and their payment according to common principles indicate a degree of central administration from the outset,[1050] it was the relocation of the caliphal capital to Syria that created courts in the Middle Eastern imperial tradition.
Sarjun ibn Mansur al-Rumi (“the Roman”) is said to have held senior administrative positions for more than 40 years, from Mu‘awiya to Abd al-Malik.[1051] By the end of the Umayyad period, the metropolitan administration was fully Arabized: Salim Abu al-Ala' (d. ca. 744) and Abd al-Hamid ibn Yahya (d. ca. 750) were Iraqis of Aramaean heritage who served as the last heads of the Marwanid “bureau of state letters” (diwan al- rasd’il), and are closely associated with the earliest extant Arabic chancery prose.[1052]The Abbasids appropriated most of the Umayyad administrative apparatus (although some senior figures, such as Abd al-Hamid, were killed),[1053] while drawing new groups from post-Sasanian Khurasan into a much larger ruling elite. Abbasid patronage created powerful dynasties of scribes, the most famous of whom are the Barmakid descendants of a Buddhist priesthood from Balkh, in Khurasan, who served the first three generations of Abbasid caliphs, and presided over the expansion of the imperial bureaucracy and the creation of the post of vizier (senior imperial administrator).[1054]
The same patterns of patronage occurred at lower levels in the bureaucracy, and at the courts of members of the ruling elite, creating a competitive milieu which was the crucible for rapid advances in the skills and technology demanded by the Abbasids and their supporters: mathematics, medicine, metallurgy, astrology, philosophy, theology, geography, history, and other sciences and disciplines. Specialist knowledge of Sasanian administrative traditions, the Arabic language, and Islamic law and religion created a class of bureaucrats (the kuttab), who sustained a distinctively Islamic statecraft, and who could transfer their services between courts within the Abbasid Caliphate, or in the Muslim successor states beyond it.60
More on the topic Organizational Power III: Imperial Administrative Elites:
- Literature and the Training of Imperial Elites
- SYSTEMS OF POWER: MILITARY, ECONOMY, ELITES
- Imperial Administrative Tasks
- Organizational Power II: Fiscal Administration
- Imperial Capital” and the Formation of Central and Regional Elites
- The Locus of Power: Kings and Queens, the Royal Court, and the Elites
- Organizational Power I: The Structures of Provincial Government
- Organizational culture as a self-reflective approach to create organizational identity (Case study: A private school in Bandung, Indonesia)
- Imperial Power
- Consolidation of Power: The Imperial Monarchy of the Principate
- Part III ACCOUNTING FOR IMPERIAL EXPANSION
- Chapter III School Power, Children's Play, and the Timing of Recess Violence
- 9 Reasserting Imperial Power? Britain and East Asia in the 1930s
- Great Power Competition and the World Wars in Trans-Imperial Perspective
- 51 Repeal of Johannes’ Anti-Christian Legislation; Banishment of Heretics and Schismatics from Cities; Expulsion of Jews and Pagans from the Imperial Administration and from the Legal Profession (Theodosius II with) Valentinian III Between 9 July and 6 August 425
- With neither its power, its wealth nor its population having been equalled by any predecessor, the dynasty known in history as Tang (618-907) enjoys a legacy much admired amidst all of those collectively constituting the imperial Chinese cultural heritage.
- Centers and Elites