Imperial Power
That was the situation in the 1750s and early 1760s. In the 1770s, however, the scattered Comanche rancherias began to coalesce around broader political ambitions. They tightened their bonds and began to bend the bordering societies under their will, seeking arrangements that could sustain their fragile existence on the plains.
This was the beginning of the extra-territorial phase of their ascent, and it would transform them from a regional into an imperial power. It was a largely improvised expansion that stemmed from a basic need to make lives and land secure; there was no vision of a kind of divinely ordained hegemonic future that animated many nomad expansions in Asia.Yet, the Comanche empire was not some accidental outcome of countless small moves aimed at meeting immediate needs. As their foreign political ambitions grew, Comanches began to develop more centralized political institutions. Local rancherias intensified their collaboration and assumed more distinct political identities as divisions or tribes. By the late eighteenth century, Comancheria was the domain of three divisions. The Yamparikas (Yap Eaters) ruled in the north, the Jupes (People of Timber) in the middle, and the Kotsotekas (Buffalo Eaters) in the south, each featuring elected head chiefs and grand councils, which made consensus-based decisions on community-wide issues. Periodically, moreover, Comanche tribes came together into massive interdivisional meetings, where vital political matters—such as treaties with colonial powers—were exposed to public scrutiny and sanction. Although intermittent, such gatherings diffused internal strife and held the local particles in a common orbit. Gradually, they gave rise to a horizontally integrated confederacy capable of concerted foreign political action.[2374]
The main arena of that action was the Spanish Southwest and its main instrument was the mounted raid.
There was no typical Comanche raid. The size of Comanche raiding parties varied from a few to hundreds of warriors, and their objectives ranged from sheer pillaging to extortion, from personal military glory to tribal vengeance for slain kin. From the 1760s onward, Comanches struck the Spanish settlements with incessant guerrilla attacks, forcing a massive transfer of property and wealth from New Spain into Comancheria. They raided all across New Mexico's eastern frontier and they engulfed Texas, a small cluster of missions and settlements, in violence. They took horses, mules, and captives and ransacked food caches. They spread terror and drained vast areas of resources. Powerless against the high-speed attacks, New Mexico and Texas adopted a defensive stance and turned inward. At the edge of the Great Plains, northern New Spain's first line of defense had begun to cave in.[2375]While exposing Spanish New Mexico and Texas to systematic exploitation, Comanches also expanded their repertoires of power. They blended raiding and terror with diplomacy and trading into a flexible economy of violence that opened multiple access points into New Spain's vast resources. They rejected the Spanish notion of undivided sovereignty and broke New Mexico and Texas into their component parts: colonial towns, presidios, missions, ranches, haciendas, and Indian villages. They pillaged horses and captives in one section of the frontier, destroyed fields and livestock in another, and traded bison products for corn in a third, pitting their interests against one another. Large areas of New Mexico became desolate, while others prospered. Taos, a major trading village in northeastern New Mexico, became a virtual Comanche satellite, where Comanches found ready markets even as their war parties were draining the rest of the colony. Spanish officials in Santa Fe and San Antonio were powerless against this raid-and-trade strategy, a mobile variation of divide-and-rule policy, and they struggled to preserve a modicum of order on their frontiers.
They began to receive regular Comanche delegations and placated them with gifts—clothing, metal, even guns—hoping to buy at least short periods of peace that could salvage the colonies. It was a humiliating role reversal for the Spaniards, who saw the arrangement as a perverse display of a barbarian cultural ascendancy over New Spain.[2376]The massive inflow of wealth allowed the Comanches to transform themselves into a trading power. Comancheria was bustling with horses, and the bordering native societies began to see it less as a threat than a resource. They sought diplomatic and commercial ties with Comanches, who responded by sponsoring trade gatherings on their borders. Major trade centers rose along the upper Arkansas, middle Red, and upper Trinity rivers, attracting trade convoys from several native nations as well as from New Mexico, Texas, and Louisiana (which in 1762 became a Spanish colony). By the late eighteenth century, Comancheria had become a trade pump that funneled horses northward among numerous nomadic native societies and eastward among native farmers and European settlers. Isolated newcomers just a generation ago, Comanches were now trading from a position of considerable strength. A long growing season and abundant grass cover made Comancheria one of the world's great natural equine habitats, but farther north longer and colder winters put severe limits on animal husbandry, creating permanent deficit regions where would-be equestrians had to rely on imported animals. By meeting that need, Comanches generated a robust counterflow of guns, powder, iron tools, cloth, corn, squash, and other essentials that kept them healthy, protected, and powerful.
It was one of the great exchange systems in the Western Hemisphere. Spanning from Mesoamerica to the Canadian plains and anchored in Comancheria, a key pivot in the hemispheric equine flow, it was comparable to the intercontinental Mongol trade network that disseminated goods and ideas across vast distances, shaped societies and cultures, and integrated Eurasia.
By raiding Spanish horse herds in New Mexico and Texas—herds that Spaniards had to periodically supplement from Mexico lest they be depleted—and by siphoning a good portion of that animal wealth northward, Comanches sponsored the rise of several equestrian societies across the North American grasslands, steering the region's history on a distinctive new path: the Great Plains became the domain of powerful equestrian nomads who defied the expansion of the United States deep into the industrial era.And just as Mongol influence stabilized large sections of Eurasia under the Pax Mongolica, so too did the Comanche stranglehold on horse trade foster political pacification. Desperate to keep the trade channels open, native groups attached themselves on the Comanche orbit as allies. Except for sporadic Apache and Osage incursions, the Comanches, the richest horse-owners in North America, were shielded from horse raiding. Comancheria became one of the safest places in early America.[2377]
More on the topic Imperial Power:
- Consolidation of Power: The Imperial Monarchy of the Principate
- Organizational Power III: Imperial Administrative Elites
- 9 Reasserting Imperial Power? Britain and East Asia in the 1930s
- Great Power Competition and the World Wars in Trans-Imperial Perspective
- With neither its power, its wealth nor its population having been equalled by any predecessor, the dynasty known in history as Tang (618-907) enjoys a legacy much admired amidst all of those collectively constituting the imperial Chinese cultural heritage.
- Unquestionably, the starkest of the rights that Roman law gave to the pater familias was “the power of life and death” (vitae necisque potestas) over those descendants who were in his paternal power.
- On 6 April 1868, the Meiji emperor proclaimed the Imperial Oath and ‘restored' the imperial rule, beginning the Meiji period (1868-1912).
- Different Imperial Designs: 'The West after the Carolingians
- Coercive Power
- The Development of Inca Power: Space and Time
- Imperial Pageantry in Ottoman Kostantiniyye
- ‘Knowledge is power’
- Political Power
- Power and Violence
- COSMOLOGY AND THE POWER OF WORDS
- Imperial Modeling in Byzantine Constantinople
- Toward a Comparative Study of Imperial Metabolism
- Hierarchy and Imperial Rule