<<
>>

The Trough of Violence in Europe

For European violence, the five decades from the 1920s to the 1960s constitute a unity because overall homicide rates declined from the nineteenth-century level, reaching their lowest point towards the end of this period.

Once more, there is no reason to assume a similar chronological unity for the non­Western world, although decolonisation had been achieved in many parts by 1970. Within Europe, the decline meant first of all that the difference between the inner and outer zones lessened; in particular, Mediterranean areas joined the core. By the 1950s and 1960s homicide rates converged in the countries west of the Iron Curtain, being well under 1 per 100,000 in most. Surprisingly perhaps, the two world wars had little lasting effect on inter­personal violence. In the last year of the first and for one or two years afterwards several countries witnessed a rise. In Belgium, for example, the temporary breakdown of the state’s monopoly of force led to a resurgence of traditional banditry. From 1920 on, homicide rates everywhere returned to the prewar level or below, despite contemporary fears that life in the trenches had degraded the men who came back. Similar things happened during and just after World War II. A rise in 1943-5 was due primarily to the activities of resistance movements. The aftermath peak was more modest than in 1919, except in Italy where some 10,000 fascists were eliminated extra-legally. Soon, however, all of Europe west of the Iron Curtain witnessed the trough of violence. Although medical expertise certainly improved between 1920 and 1970, the effect of this improvement on the decline of homicide probably was modest.

As we advance through the period 1920-70, non-European homicide rates are increasingly available. We know them for the ‘Western Offshoots’ since the beginning of the twentieth century; they are similar to European rates in Canada and Australia but much higher in the United States.

With Africa still a blank spot on the chart, Latin America begins to emerge as the leading continent in violence. In Mexican causes-of-death statistics the homicide rate fluctuates annually between 40 and 67 from 1927 until 1952; from 1953 (nearly 38) it decreases until a low of just under 10 in 1969: still higher than in the United States at the time. The Argentinian homicide rate averaged 6 in the 1960s. A surprisingly low rate of 1.1, on the other hand, is reported for Egypt in the 1950s and 1960s. It is not always clear, however, whether such rates are based on causes of death or prosecutions only. Indian national homicide rates, fluctuating between 2.5 and 3 in the 1950s and 1960s, were collected by its federal police from reported cases and arrests.[324]

Turning to qualitative aspects of European violence, we must once more begin with a negative characteristic. Homicide rates declined further because fewer fights ended lethally. The relative peacefulness of working-class males, in particular the renunciation of settling conflicts with knives, intensified and became geographically more widespread. This development was due in part to conscious campaigns to change the behaviour of the rough sections of the working classes, through housing projects for example. In the 1950s and 1960s knives more often were the weapon of choice for men who killed their female partners than for those attacking other men. This coincided with the culmination of a centuries-long trend by which murders in intimate relationships accounted for an ever larger proportion of total homicide. By the mid twentieth century they made up between a third and nearly half in several European countries. With the fascination for crime passionnel gone, moreover, murders of intimates or rivals in love received equal public condemnation as other types of homicide. Murder had become a marginal phenomenon.

The marginalisation of murder was symbolised most tellingly in the rise of and subsequent fascination with serial killers.

They were not new in the period examined in this section. Serial killing appeared on the European scene from the mid nineteenth century onward, first in France - that is, if we define the perpetrators as murderers who select specific types of victims for sadistic pleasure, often with a sexual element, and exclude serial poisoners with a financial motive who have been attested since the seventeenth century. Whereas poisoning could remain undetected for some time, the ‘modern' type of murder sequence simply was impossible to carry out in a preindustrial world where all neighbours intensely supervised each other. During the interwar period this phenomenon underwent a geographic spread, most notably to Weimar Germany. Its most notorious serial killer was Fritz Haarmann, who, in Hanover between 1918 and 1924, at the point of his orgasm bit through the throats of the male adolescents he had seduced. The opportunity for seduction offered itself because the police had recruited him as an informer and unofficial detective. For the phenomenon of serial killing, our 1970 dividing line has less meaning than for overall homicide

The second marginal phenomenon, which inculcated both fascination and fear, was the underworld, as it came to be called. The underworld appeared in Europe's largest cities around 1900, with a concentration of prostitution, gambling and the homes of habitual criminals in a few neighbourhoods. It became firmly established during the interwar period in cities such as London, Berlin and Marseilles, although these did not match the reputation of Chicago. Indeed, in Europe after particularly notorious incidents, the media and the public alarmingly spoke of an American situation. This happened in Berlin in 1928, when a participant in a massive fight between two rival gangs had died and a host of club members escorted the victim to his funeral in cars. The media concluded that the underworld was motorised, which enabled them to perform quick raids into wealthy neighbourhoods.

Despite driving cars, most criminal gangs of the interwar years were based locally and this largely remained so in the 1950s and 1960s.

As I have posited earlier, the hippie movement of the second half of the 1960s was the cultural corollary to the trough in violence. Its encompassing youth culture was at home in Europe no less than in the United States. Whereas young men for ages had been the main perpetrators of physical violence, hippies, male and female, renounced it and proclaimed love. Although like-minded youth groups preceded them, these had consisted overwhelmingly of young men and women with a middle-class background. The hippie movement was the first to attract a significant part of working­class youths. As it turned out, this ideal of peacefulness was short-lived, but we must turn to the pre-1970 non-Western world first. While some hippies proclaimed a cultural revolution, non-violent of course, this term soon became associated with a wave of massive violence in China. This semantic switch symbolises the diverging experiences of the West and the rest.

Unfortunately, the semantic switch is also a symbol for the state of research (in languages accessible to this author). Qualitative evidence for violence in the non-Western world, 1920-70, abounds, but it refers over­whelmingly to instances of mass violence or to colonial repression. Thus, one study with violence as first word in the title, covering European colonies world-wide during the interwar period, deals in fact with the policing of labour unrest. The author argues that economic interests rather than political concerns determined when and where police forces were called upon.[325] One exception, in which the focus is on interpersonal violence, concerns the African cases in which Indigenous beliefs played a facilitating role. Especially notorious were the medicine murders in Lesotho, tried between 1895 and 1969, whose perpetrators believed that their victims' organs gave them extra strength.

The murders masked as leopard attacks in Nigeria and Ghana, 1945-8, were probably cases of revenge but the killers took advantage of beliefs about were-animals.

Martin Wiener's study of murder in various British colonies, extending to 1935, focuses on the legal treatment ofWesterners who had killed non-whites. In British Honduras, now Belize, the colonial elite mingled with immigrants from the southern United States. One of them, an Alabama-born lumber mill owner, searched the home of his black employee for stolen goods in 1934, finding none but yet shooting the tenant to death. The owner claimed that his gun fired accidentally but several black witnesses testified that he had threatened the victim. This resulted in a life sentence, of which the con­demned eventually served two and a half years.[326] For Argentina, finally, a process of refinement has been observed which involved the retreat of the rough gaucho as a cultural hero. The ‘new guard' of tango lyric writers, active in the 1920s and 1930s, wrote about independent women and romantic men, whereas the ‘old guard', active 1880-1920, had glorified honorific men who subjugated women and often were skilled knife fighters.[327]

<< | >>
Source: Edwards Louise, Penn Nigel, Winter Jay (eds.). The Cambridge World History of Violence. Volume 4: 1800 to the Present. Cambridge University Press,2020. — 676 p.. 2020

More on the topic The Trough of Violence in Europe:

  1. The archaeological evidence for violence and for the symbolic representation of violence in Iron Age Europe is abundant and complex.
  2. Any study of sexual and family violence in early modern Europe must first acknowledge and confront the problems of language and meaning.
  3. Intercommunal Violence in Europe
  4. Violence and Murder in Europe
  5. Sexual and Family Violence in Europe
  6. Visualising Violence in Reformation Europe
  7. Criminal Violence and Culture in Europe
  8. Seigneurial Violence in Medieval Europe
  9. Violence, Animals and Sport in Europe and the Colonies
  10. Violence and Justice in Europe: Punishment, Torture and Execution
  11. Violence towards Heretics and Witches in Europe, 1022-1800
  12. Early Massacres: Mass Violence in Neolithic Europe
  13. Ritual Violence and Headhunting in Iron Age Europe