<<
>>

Transition of Foreigners from Agents and Objects of Violence to Members of Society

Foreign acculturation could be the result of voluntary submission to the Egyptian ruler and subsequent passing through the status of hem-servant - a process that could involve participation in work details - a class from which unacculturated foreigners remain separate.[384] Passage through hem­status as a means of Egyptianisation would also be the path of the properly instructed prisoner of war.

In pictorial representations of the fate of captives, the process of acculturation of prisoners of war marks a boundary between the unrestrained behaviour of the foreign captives and corresponding violence meted out to them by their Egyptian captors, and the ordered behaviour of the pacified and properly Egyptianised - albeit suitably deferential - foreigners and their now allied fellow Egyptians.[385] This need not necessarily be an egalitarian process; the con­cept of working into a civilised state, predicated on an assumption of a native idleness, figures in arguments for forced labour in viceregal Mexico, where the concept of the New World natives as persona miserable[386] corresponds to the common Egyptian use of the adjective ‘wretched' describing Nubia and Nubians. Acculturation through military service could involve a physical change such as branding, circum­cision, the learning of Egyptian and ultimately the acquisition of land.[387]

The foreigners could, at the same time, retain a peculiar identity in auxiliary military units.[388]

<< | >>
Source: Fagan Garrett G., Fibiger Linda, Hudson Mark, Trundle Matthew (eds.). The Cambridge World History of Violence. Volume 1: The Prehistoric and Ancient Worlds. Cambridge University Press,2020. — 756 p.. 2020

More on the topic Transition of Foreigners from Agents and Objects of Violence to Members of Society:

  1. Political Protest and Collective Violence: Models of Transition
  2. Imperial Chinese society accepted and even lauded certain types of violence. Fundamental views of sanctioned violence developed in reaction to that culture's particular views of masculinity.
  3. Violence is a part of every society's history, and China is no exception.
  4. Divination is a system of knowledge and belief that serves the purpose of the mainte­nance of the symbolic universe1 in a society sharing the conviction that things happening on earth are not coincidental but managed by superhuman agents, reflecting decisions made in the world of gods or spirits.
  5. Implications for Understanding Neolithic Society: Violence as Communication
  6. Behavioral Violence in a Consumer Society
  7. Violence in Ancient Egyptian Society
  8. Violence, Civil Society and European Civilisation
  9. State, Society and Trained Violence in China, 618-1500
  10. If we confront sociology's most important question: what is society? we could say that we can no longer straightforwardly describe society as a thing.
  11. Why is it that the leaders of one indigenous society—the Urarina of Peruvian Ama­zonia—rely on violent discursive formations when talking about debt peonage, even though coercive violence is not a primary aspect of this form of labor recruitment as practiced today?
  12. RITUAL OBJECTS
  13. Culture of the African Animal-Associated Members of the MTC