<<
>>

Future Directions

In utilizing the social ecological framework in conjunction with the classic CBSCM, the new CBSECM offers to capture the dynamic inter­play between multiple contexts that frame an intercultural or intergroup conflict episode.

For example, on the primary macrolevel of analysis on the different components, it draws our attention to the importance of under­standing the intergroup historical context, the larger religious ideologies and cultural values’ context, and the various exolevel institutional reactions and media reporting in shaping a real-life conflict situation.

While the benefits of the social ecological perspective entail the systematic analysis of each level that asserts influence on the conflict case story, it is also critical to move the theo­retical boundary even further to enhance the explanatory nature of this heuristic theoretical framework. This section presents some chal­lenging theoretical and promising research directions drawing from the CBSECM.

<< | >>
Source: Oetzel John, Ting-Toomey Stella. The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Communication: Integrating Theory, Research and Practice. SAGE Publications,2013. — 912 p.. 2013

More on the topic Future Directions:

  1. Summary and future directions
  2. Oetzel John, Ting-Toomey Stella. The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Communication: Integrating Theory, Research and Practice. SAGE Publications,2013. — 912 p., 2013
  3. Culture-Based Social Ecological Conflict Model: A New Model
  4. Conclusion The Pyramid of Peace: Past, Present and Future
  5. Subject Index
  6. Notes
  7. Barger A.M., MacNeill A.L. (Eds.). Small Animal Cytologic Diagnosis: Canine and Feline Disease. CRC Press,2024. — 536 p., 2024
  8. References
  9. Harker C., Horschelmann K. (Eds.). Conflict, Violence and Peace. Springer,2017. — 456 p., 2017
  10. Control of BTB in Ethiopia