<<
>>

The Challenge of Complexity

From the complexity of individual illnesses to the complexity of diverse structures, poli­cies, and providers, the challenge of shar­ing, integrating, and coordinating knowledge and medical information is overwhelming.

We contend that challenges in health care are likely to become even more complex. Vanderford et al. (2001) and others have argued that conflicts between providers and patients are likely to increase given newer approaches to health delivery that seek to empower patients and create partnerships in health management. While advances in technology provide increased patient access to information, they also increase ambigu­ity and complexity of decision making. New technologies have the potential to enhance the gathering and storing of patient information, enable efficient and timely communication, and facilitate administrative work, yet the dif­fusion of these innovations will require time to learn and institutionalize. Knowledge gaps will continue within certain populations based on health and computer literacy, access, and cultural beliefs and values. So while techno­logical innovations may alleviate or minimize some sources of conflict, new sources of con­flict are likely to emerge.

With medical advances, people are liv­ing longer, revealing new and more com­plex illnesses. This leads to greater need for collaborative health care teams, as well as for more intergenerational and intercultural conversations among providers and patients. Changes in the institutions with which health care organizations interact are also likely to change, as health care reforms (e.g., insurance, medical malpractice) continue to be debated and adopted.

While the scholarly works described in this chapter are often limited by small sam­ples, a focus on a singular relationship or party, and are heavily contextualized, these studies highlight the need for health care pro­viders and patients to develop a sophisticated repertoire of interpersonal skills that includes reading others’ needs and self-monitoring. They also point to the important role for hos­pital administrators in creating a culture that values the professional contributions of all medical providers, acknowledges the role of the patient, and commits resources to conflict management. Communication scholars are well poised to make an important contribu­tion to the needs of health care providers and patients by continuing research to identify key factors across contexts and samples, evaluating the effectiveness of conflict train­ing programs and interventions, and develop­ing more sophisticated conceptualizations of effective communication to enhance theoreti­cal development and expand the applicability of practical recommendations for conflict management in health care.

Note

1. The term provider is used here to refer to doc­tors, nurses, physician assistants, technicians, therapists, and other professionals who pro­vide direct care to patients.

<< | >>
Source: Oetzel John, Ting-Toomey Stella. The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Communication: Integrating Theory, Research and Practice. SAGE Publications,2013. — 912 p.. 2013

More on the topic The Challenge of Complexity:

  1. The Challenge of Complexity
  2. Challenges for Scaling Agent-Based Modeling
  3. Conceptualizing the Discourse of Conflict
  4. CONCLUSION
  5. Acentral challenge communities confront is how to manage significant conflict and disputes over important issues such as land use, economic development, environmental concerns, education, poverty, access to health care, and safety.
  6. Oetzel John, Ting-Toomey Stella. The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Communication: Integrating Theory, Research and Practice. SAGE Publications,2013. — 912 p., 2013
  7. OUR MODEL OF LEARNING THROUGH REFLECTION ON EXPERIENCE
  8. Premise
  9. Conclusion: Emerging Problems in Theory and Practice
  10. CONFLICT TYPES