LOOKING OUTSIDE THE PM STANDARDS WORLD: THE LOGICAL FRAMEWORK APPROACH
The previously discussed standards offer a generic project management approach (i.e., applicable for all project types) and do not consider different contexts (e.g., industries or project types) (Garcia 2005).
Furthermore because they didn’t provide much evidence for the consideration of SD principles in the project initiation, we were looking for recognized project management approach, which would per nature of the project consider SD principles. SD is an important issue in regional development projects (Stockmann 1997). A well known approach for these projects is the Logical Framework Approach (LFA) (Norad 1999) which is applied by the World Bank (The World Bank 1997).The participative process design of the LFA is based on a participatory analysis (stakeholder
analysis) as first step of the initiation process. All important stakeholders are invited to participate in the process and contribute actively to the decision regarding the realization of an investment. The LFA defines important stakeholders as all organizations and individuals that are necessary to fully understand the investment and/or that have an interest regarding the investment. Each stakeholder has the possibility to define investment ideas and to share his/her opinion.
In the LFA a more holistic cost benefit analysis considering economic, social as well as ecologic principles described. The cost benefit analysis described in the LFA defines the following criteria: total costs, benefits to main stakeholder, probability of achieving objectives, and social risks (Norad 1999; The World Bank 1997). Furthermore, the LFA defines following possible additional criteria (See Table 4).
A central value of the LFA is transparency. Problems, causes and effects are analyzed and communicated to the stakeholders. This open and transparent communication form leads to a more holistic investment decision because the identified problem, cause and effects can be considered in the decision.
Values like participation, transparency and acceptance are very important in the LFA. No decision is done without the confirmation of the stakeholders. A high social responsibility about countries but also about the stakeholders itself is observable.
The described cost benefit analysis in the LFA is a potential to further develop investment analysis methods for other project types. Nevertheless, one limitation of the LFA is its focus only on the project initiation and not the consideration of managing the whole investment life cycle.
More on the topic LOOKING OUTSIDE THE PM STANDARDS WORLD: THE LOGICAL FRAMEWORK APPROACH:
- Chapter 28 ICT Infrastructure Framework for Microfinance Institutions and Banks in Pakistan: An Optimized Approach
- Logical truth and logical properties
- PM STANDARDS AND INVESTMENT ANALYSIS
- STANDARDS FOR FORENSIC ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS
- Logical Features
- Military Standards of Conduct and Professionalism
- The logical structure of econometrics
- Compliance With Accreditation Standards
- Compliance With Accreditation Standards
- Syllogistics and the Logical Properties of the argumenla a fortiori and reductio ad absurdum
- Ross as a Logical Empiricist
- 2 Husbandry and estate management: statutory standards
- Natural language and logical form
- Environmental Management Systems: ISO-14000 Standards
- 3 Water quality standards and environmental permits
- The logical structure of econometrics
- PART III Logical Matter
- The logical structure of game theory
- The logical structure of Sraffian economic theory
- What is the STEHD framework for?