Who Was Ivan Bohun?
Ivan Bohun, the colonel of the Kalnitsky regiment, was one of the most outstanding and effective Cossack commanders in Ukraine. Following the calamity at Berestechko where as acting hetman Bohun saved the Ukrainian army from total destruction, he was often entrusted by Bohdan Khmelnitskywith key border guard duties against the invading Polish armies.
Reputed for his tactical abilities—particularly his on-the-spot improvisations—he was well known to the Poles who could recognize him from a distance by the gleam of his polished breastplate, which as a rule was never worn by Cossacks. Bohun was respected by the Cossack officers and held in high esteem by the rank-and-file, who kept his memory alive in the Ukrainian oral traditions and ballads.Yet, who was Ivan Bohun? To this day we know nothing of his early life, where and when he was born, or of his family background, something which is unusual for a man of his position and fame. Well educated and versed in martial affairs, he was most certainly of noble birth. His point of entry into the Cossack movement is also unknown. He may have taken part in the unsuccessful Cossack-peasant revolt of 1637-38, but this is not certain. He first becomes known in the Zaporozhian and Don Cossack defense of the captured Turkish fortress of Azov during 1637-42, where he commanded a Cossack troop that was covering the Borivsky ford across the northern Donets River. After the Cossacks abandoned and destroyed Azov, Bohun (it seems) became a registered Cossack—we don’t know at what rank—and took part in the regular anti-Tatar expeditions and fighting.
Bohun joined Khmelnitsky s revolt in 1648 and a year later he is counted as a member of the Chyhyryn regiment. By 1650 Bohun is appointed as colonel of the Kalnitsky regiment, evidently for his military leadership and organizational ability. His crowning glory came during the Berestechko battle in 1651 when the Ukrainian peasant and Cossack army was facing a catastrophic defeat.
Elected as acting Hetman on 30 June he personally led the Cossack cavalry charge against the dragoons and heavy hussars which cleared the way for the evacuation across the marshy Pliasheva River. Following the withdrawal he led the scorched earth activity and guerrilla-type fighting to slow the advancing Polish army. Later he was often entrusted with border guard duty and front-line defense against Polish invasions, where he demonstrated outstanding tactical ability and resourcefulness, which became legendary. It is a matter of record that he never was defeated by an enemy commander. During Charnetskis invasion of Ukraine, Bohun barred the way at Monastishche and in spite of superior forces the Polish commander was unable to break through Bohuns defensive system. Bohun is known in Ukrainian folklore as a defender of the rank- and-file Cossacks and peasants who usually distanced himself from most of the officers’ self-interested agendas, indicating he was probably not a member of the Rus nobility. The Kalnitsky Colonel was also reputed to have refused to swear allegiance to the Muscovite Tsar at Pereiaslav, and was not a signatory of Vy- hovsky s Treaty of Hadiach or Yuras Khmelnitsky’s Slobodian- sky document in 1660.Table 14.1. The total number of Dutch ships passing through the Sound into the Baltic Sea (adapted by Romano, R., 1978)
Years: 1576-80 1581-5 1586-90 1591-5 1596-1600 1601-05 1606-10 1611-15 1616-20 1621-5 1626-30
Ships: 13,501 11,810 16,072 19,616 18,009 13,167 16,732 16,877 19,455 13,852 9,110
The mystery behind Ivan Bohuns identity deepens when we note that the surname “Bohun” was unknown in Ukraine or Eastern Europe, but was of some renown on the opposite end of the continent in England and Scotland. OfNorman French origin, the de Bohuns (Bohons) arrived in England during or shortly after the conquest, taking their name from a village in the Contentin, between Cautances and the estuary of the Vire River. The third Baron de Bohun and his eldest son remained loyal to King Henry II (1154-89) during the revolts which were led against him by his sons, and were rewarded when the eldest son was made Earl of Hereford.
Humphrey s youngest son Robert, however, was a close friend of Prince Henry—King Henry II s youngest son—and when the Prince revolted against his father in 1173 he was joined by Robert. The revolt was supported by King William (“The Lion”) of Scotland but the rebels and King William were defeated on 13 July 1174 by King Henry s army led by the 3rd Baron de Bohun.King William was taken prisoner, Prince Henry was forgiven by his father, and Humphrey s son Robert fled to Scotland. One of Humphrey’s sons married King William s sister Margaret but Sir Robert de Bohun never returned to England and lived on his Scottish estate, becoming a highly respected manorial lord known as “Le Bon” (“The Good”). The English branch remained with the kings of England, and Humphrey VIII de Bohun followed King Edward to Bannockburn where he was taken prisoner and later exchanged for Robert Bruces wife. The conjecture would be that Ivan (Ian) Bohun was a descendant of the Scottish branch of the family. As already noted, Scotsmen were not strangers to the Baltic region, trading and carrying on business as, for example, he who became the Cossack Colonel Krivonos. Also, thousands fought on the Protestant side during the Thirty Years’ War, and some taken prisoner may have escaped to join the Zaporozhian Brotherhood, where their military training and battle experience would have been welcomed.
Following Hetman Bohdan Khmelnitsky’s death, Bohun served under both hetmans Vyhovsky and the young Khmelnitsky. He was imprisoned for unknown reason(s) by the Poles in Malborg castle in Ducal Prussia but released by KingJan Casimir on the following year, on a promise he would serve in the invasion of left-bank Ukraine. He was “arrested” again on the left bank by the Poles, accused of plotting with Hetman Briukhovetsky and the Muscovite authorities, and was shot without a trial by a firing squad on 17 February 1664 near Novhorod-Siversk. He was unmarried and did not leave any descendants, but only an undying fame and a memory among the Ukrainian people:
And the kobzars played Touching the strings softly, Bohdan and Bohun they praised....”36
More on the topic Who Was Ivan Bohun?:
- Who Was Ivan Bohun?
- Who was Ivan Mazepa, and why is he considered a “traitor” in Russia?
- Index
- Adevoted communist and a Jew in love with Ukraine, Ivan Kulyk epitomizes a dilemma that might be best illuminated with a parable.
- Ivan Lysiak-Rudnytsky, Scholar and “Communicator”
- Ivan Kulyk versus the NKVD
- Theme 7. The Ruin of Hetmanshchyna between 1659 and 1687 and the Hetmanate of Ivan Mazepa (1687 - 1709)
- The Great Ukrainian People
- The Guard on Parade