Live Attenuated Whole-Cell Vaccines
23.2.1 Overview
The current trend towards testing novel live attenuated MAP strains (LAV) produced by molecular genetic techniques as vaccine candidates follows the growing evidence that specific attenuation of M.
tuberculosis to provide a stable and safe strain is capable of improving on BCG, an attenuated Mycobacterium bovis strain, to control M. tuberculosis infection (Tameris et al., 2019). Tailoring this approach to MAP assumes that the wild-type genome encodes mechanisms that can interfere with immune processing of the multiplicity of antigens present in the MAP cell wall or secreted during intracellular persistence and that these critical pathways will be disabled in LAV strains. This assumption then predicts that by freeing these road-blocks a range of protective responses will be enacted, able to clear the vaccine strain, reducing its dissemination into the environment and any subsequent wild-type challenge. As with all live strains, an additional confounder is the high probability that any LAV inoculation will induce reactivities that interfere with existing bovine tuberculosis skin testing, thus a further assumption, predicting that a more specific test differentiating infected from vaccinated animals (DIVA) is likely to emerge in the near future, is inherent (Serrano et al., 2017).Initial attempts to identify candidate targets determining MAP virulence have relied in the most part, on in vitro assays to provide a preliminary screen before entering animal studies. Techniques employed have included the onset of auxotrophy (Cavaignac et al., 2000) and, more widely, differential survival of candidate LAV vs wild-type strain controls in short-lived monocyte-derived macrophage (MDM) assays involving either uptake and entry, shorttime survival or ability to induce apoptosis (Scandurra et al., 2009; Park et al., 2011).
It has been emphatically demonstrated however that this rationale, while intuitive, does not predict generation of protective immunity in vivo (Bannantine et al., 2014a; Lamont et al., 2014). This revelation severely limits screening options for LAV candidates and underlines the current lack of knowledge about in vivo MAP pathogenic mechanisms and the genes critical to enact them. Most LAV entered into expensive animal trials have thus included MAP gene homologues of targets already validated as virulence factors in M. tuberculosis (Forrellad et al., 2013). In all cases these have involved single-gene knockouts (Table 23.1), which have, as yet, not had their individual virulence factor status verified by gene complementation. It is likely, however, that as in M. tuberculosis vaccine development, any novel LAV with commercial promise will require double gene knockouts, excision of undesired antibiotic selection markers inserted during construction and definitive environmental survival studies, to pass the strict regulatory safety requirements for authorized genetically modified organism release (Walker et al., 2010). As double knockout LAV of MAP have not yet been generated or tested, the influence this preferred alteration may have on protective outcomes is a current unknown and will undoubtedly require investigation in future studies.Genomic manipulation approaches used to generate novel LAV candidates have included random transposon mutagenesis (Harris et al., 1999; Shin et al., 2006) and directed allelic exchange through specialized shuttle plasmidphage transduction, first developed in M. tuberculosis (Bardarov et al., 2002; Park et al., 2008). Strain libraries generated by random insertion mutagenesis using a kanamycin-marked transposon (TN5367) were pre-screened for potential attenuation using auxotrophic media (Cavaignac et al., 2000) or ip. challenge in mice 12 weeks/goats 6-12 months (Shin et al., 2006; Scandurra et al., 2010). This identified a shortlist of LAV candidates (Table 23.1) with defined MAP gene knockouts (MAP1566, MAP0053c, MAP0011, MAP3963, MAP2408c) that were chosen for downstream challenge studies in animals (Scandurra et al., 2010; Settles et al.,
2014).
In a consortium approach (Bannantine et al., 2014b) aimed at deriving a rational framework for trialling MAP vaccines, this list was extended further to include more TN5367-derived LAV candidates (Rathnaiah et al., 2014) targeting both genes (MAP0460) and intragenic regions (MAP3695-3696, MAP0282c-0283c, MAP1150c-1151c). Additionally, two allelic exchange-derived knockout strains (MAP1047, MAP3893c) were included that had shown decreased in vitro survival characteristics in MDM and evidence of attenuation in an ileal cannulation challenge (12 weeks) in young calves (Park et al., 2011). The candidate panel (22 strains) when tested for survival in bovine MDM over 7 days indicated that none of the strains was significantly attenuated for survival relative to a wildtype (MAPK10) strain (Lamont et al., 2014). Some strains were flagged as having a lower capacity for intracellular persistence measured by a sharper slope of decrease in colony-forming unit (CFU) load between 2 and 7 days (Lamont et al., 2014) and others a reduced capacity to induce MDM apoptosis (Kabara and Coussens, 2012) or entry into MDM cultures (Rathnaiah et al., 2014). Using these screening assays, eight candidates were promoted to mouse studies and five candidates for goat challenge model studies to be compared against a heat-killed vaccine standard (Silirum) using previously defined animal models (Hines et al., 2007a).Despite these high likelihood ‘indicator’ parameters, each of eight LAV chosen when tested in mice (CL57BL/6) using a low-dose immunization given ip. followed by low-dose ip. challenge after 6 weeks, failed to show any significant protection 12 weeks post-challenge relative to a phosphate buffered saline (PBS) sham vaccinated group (Bannantine et al., 2014a). Parallel study of two further strains LAV MAP3963 and MAP2408c using a higher dose immunization but administered sc., boosted after 2 weeks, followed by low-dose ip. challenge given 5 weeks later showed only minor improvement in protection, with only one log decrease in mucosal tissue loads relative to PBS sham vaccination 18 weeks post-challenge (Settles et al., 2014).
The LAV panel tested in goats using a higher immunization dose plus 2-week boost given orally, followed by high-dose challenge also given orally 3 weeks after immunization, also failed to show any significant protection in tissue and shedding 13 weeks post-challenge with all LAV strains showing greater faecal shedding than animals protected with the sc. administered commercial control vaccine (Hines et al., 2014). These authors concluded that the use of a non-ruminant animal model such as mice for screening was suboptimal due to unpredictable infection rates, the lack of inducible chronic intestinal granulomatous infection and the inability to monitor faecal excretion. They also concluded that determining strain attenuation in vitro using cell culture models was not a good predictor for survival of LAV in vivo (in this case goats) or of protective potential.These observations are somewhat in line with studies on other LAV candidates. LAV strains MAP3025c, MAP3291c and MAP1534 screened for attenuated persistence in C57BL/6 mice using a high ip. dose, showed significant attenuation (but no clearance) after 12 weeks (Chen et al., 2012). High ip. dose immunization of C57BL/6 mice with these candidates followed by high oral dose challenge, 3 weeks postimmunization, provided a decrease in visible acid-fast organisms by microscopy 12 weeks post-challenge relative to PBS sham vaccination. Further study of LAV MAP3025c in goats using high sc. dose immunization, boosted at 3 weeks, followed by high oral dose challenge, 3 weeks post-immunization, provided a decrease in tissue loads 6 months post-challenge and some evidence of decreases in faecal shedding relative to PBS sham but no reduction superior to commercial (Mycopar) vaccination (Faisal et al., 2013a). Of note here is the choice to deliver LAV immunizations ip., a route previously shown to be ineffective for live 316F-based vaccines (Griffin et al., 2009).
A separate study using LAV MAP1566, MAP0053c and MAP0011 showed differential induction of apoptosis in MDM and reduced persistence after 12-day infections relative to wild-type strains (Kabara and Coussens, 2012).
Goats challenged with a high LAV dose delivered unusually iv., showed a significant attenuation in MAP1566 after 6-10 months (Scandurra et al., 2010). Disappointingly, single low sc. dose immunization of BALB/c mice, followed by medium ip. dose challenge, 7 weeks postimmunization with these strains, showed no significant decrease in overall challenge load in spleen and liver 12 weeks post-challenge compared with sham PBS vaccination. The authors suggested that failure in protection could have been due to excessive attenuation of the LAVs being tested. This situation applies in the case of tuberculosis vaccination, where M. bovis BCG is known to replicate for some time in a host and engenders a good protective response against tuberculosis (Andersen and Doherty, 2005), whereas strains of M. bovis that are too attenuated do not (Collins et al., 2002). In contrasting studies however, LAV MAP3893c and LAV MAP1047 were shown to have low and high attenuation, respectively, in a cattle cannulation model using 12 weeks post-challenge (Park et al., 2011). The highly attenuated strain given as a single high oral dose immunization in goats, followed by high oral dose challenge, 8 weeks post-immunization, showed an increased degree of protection and LAV strain clearance after 8 weeks over the lower attenuated example. When repeated in cattle with a single high oral dose immunization, followed by high oral dose challenge, 4 weeks post-immunization a small relative increase in the degree of protection from wild-type MAPK10 challenge was again apparent in the LAV MAP1047 strain plus apparent clearance of the LAV strain 16 weeks post-immunization (Park et al., 2014).Study of single-gene allelic exchange mutants MAP4201 or MAP3323c, both global signalling factors, showed LAV attenuation in vitro using MDM at 7 days and some attenuation when given ip. at high dose into immunodeficient BALB/c mice (Ghosh et al., 2013, 2014,
2015). Testing in C57BL/6 mice using a low sc.
dose immunization with a 2-week boost followed by high ip. dose challenge, 4 weeks postimmunization, provided two logs of protection 9 weeks post-challenge relative to a PBS sham or a commercial heat-killed (Mycopar) vaccination. Challenge studies continued in goats with LAV MAP3323c and another strain LAV MAP3006c (encoding a lipase), a strain that had been rejected in previous screening (Bannantine et al., 2014b) due to positive growth characteristics in MDM. Animals given a single high s.c. dose immunization followed by high oral dose challenge, 8 weeks post-immunization, provided two logs of protection in tissue 12 months post-challenge and encouragingly, in the LAV MAP3006c strain only, no detection of faecal shedding (Shippy et al., 2017). This is the only LAV reported to include possible abrogation of faecal shedding in a ruminant animal group and, if transferable to cattle without compromising tuberculin testing, it could represent a significant step forward in this field.Notably, despite some attempts at standardizing methodology and encouraging the use of comparable controls, none of the studies described above followed the same protocol for any species of animal and mouse models using a variety of strains. In some studies power calculations on group sizes prior to testing were absent or not reported and test groups in larger animals were often very low. Other parameters seemed to have been arbitrarily chosen. Immunization dosing ranged from 1 ? 104 - 2 ? 109 CFU/animal and multiple variations of ip., iv., sc., id., im. and oral were employed to immunize and/or challenge. Some LAV were boosted and some, particularly those given orally, were only single dose. Several different challenge strains were used among the published studies. Times between the last immunizing dose and challenge ranged from 3- 8 weeks, longitudinal monitoring of LAV and challenge strain excretion was often omitted or deemed impossible to perform and the important final time point chosen to evaluate the degree of protection post-challenge were even greater in range. The use of Silirum heat-killed vaccine in mice was reported to be ineffective (Bannantine et al., 2014a) thus in many cases there was no valid control group allowing comparison with one of the current commercial killed whole-cell vaccine ‘gold standards’ and protections relative to sham vaccination with PBS were used. Surprisingly, LAV were delivered in most cases without adjuvant, a major factor in subunitbased vaccines. In the only case where one was used, comparison was made on one LAV only (Ghosh et al., 2015).
The reasons for not considering adjuvanted LAV are unclear. Early MAP vaccines using classically attenuated strains were all delivered sc., live in aggressive adjuvants such as mineral oil or pumice and, as a result, stimulated a wide range of immunological responses, in a similar way to the dead whole vaccines that have replaced them. One attempt to induce protection using a non-adjuvanted live strain of MAP316F in sheep however was unsuccessful (Begg and Griffin, 2005). This is contrary to the situation pertaining to the use of BCG in protecting against tuberculosis, where live BCG without an adjuvant gives very much better protection than dead BCG administered in a mineral oil adjuvant (Griffin et al., 1999). Using an appropriate adjuvant however could be critical. A study comparing adjuvanted vaccination in sheep (Griffin et al., 2009) suggested standard mineral oilbased vaccine sc. delivery of a killed 316F strain invoked vigorous cell-mediated and humoral reactivity while live 316F delivered in lipid- based adjuvant formulations invoked lower cell- mediated responses and no humoral response.
The development of novel live MAP strains to use as vaccines has several important regulatory, bio-safety and diagnostic issues that will need to be addressed, similar to some of those pertaining to live tuberculosis vaccines (Walker et al., 2010), before commercialization is feasible. Nevertheless, the use of well-characterized stable attenuated MAP mutants as vaccines remains attractive as they would be cheaper than subunit-based vaccines to manufacture and at this moment appear to offer the opportunity of delivering superior protection possibly without the need for a logistically difficult requirement for administering a boost dose.
23.3
More on the topic Live Attenuated Whole-Cell Vaccines:
- As we have just seen, Plasmodium has specific mechanisms that enable it to live inside a red blood cell. When both a parasite and its host possess such specific mechanisms, that observation suggests that the strong selection pressure that hosts and parasites impose on each other has caused their populations to evolve.
- NEWER VACCINES
- COMBINATION VACCINES
- CELL-ASSOCIATED AND CELL-FREE VIRUS DURING HAART
- VACCINES IN NATIONAL IMMUNIZATION SCHEDULE
- INDIVIDUAL VACCINES
- VACCINES FOR SELECTIVE USE
- ADDITIONAL VACCINES RECOMMENDED BY IAP
- Subunit Protein-Based Vaccines
- GP120 VACCINES
- Endoparasites live inside their host
- Climate controls where and how organisms live