<<
>>

PATHOGENESIS, PATHOLOGY AND IMMUNITY

Anaplasma, Ehrlichia and some Rickettsia species are known to exploit mammals as reservoir hosts, and they do so using strategies that best facilitate their transmission to arthropods.

For members of all three genera, these strategies appear not to provoke pathology but rather to involve a far more subtle manipulation of the host. Studies on wildlife are limited; however, it appears that Rickettsia species, on entering a susceptible host, are likely to be sequestered via lymphatic vessels to regional lymph nodes and then spread to various organs via the bloodstream. Rickettsia species have a tropism for endothelial cells and infection is thought to be characterized by disseminated vascular endothelial cell infections in all organs. For Ana- plasma and Ehrlichia species, the early stages of infection are likely to be similar to those described for Rickettsia species. However, different Ehrlichia and Anaplasma species possess markedly different strategies of host inter­action, primarily by targeting different types of host cells to subvert. Anaplasma phagocytophilum associates with neutrophils and probably endothelial cells, whereas A. marginale parasitizes erythrocytes. Ehrlichia canis and E. muris infect monocytic cells.

Unlike Rickettsia species, Anaplasma and Ehrlichia species are unable to synthesize lipopolysaccharide or peptidogly­can. Both of these molecules are important pathogen/ microbe-associated molecular patterns, recognized by cells of the host innate immune system, so their absence is likely to help immune evasion by invading Anaplasma and Ehr­lichia species. In the absence of a conventional envelope, the integrity of the outer membrane of these species is maintained by incorporating cholesterol from the host cell. Endocytosis leads to cell entry and the creation of an intra­cellular inclusion, but this inclusion does not progress along the endocytic membrane transport pathway, and thus is not subjected to lysosomal fusion.

Anaplasma phagocy- tophilum remain within the inclusion and begin to multiply (these inclusions appear as classical ‘morulae’ in stained blood smears). Morulae eventually become swollen, and bacteria disperse when they are liberated from infected cells.

Little is known about the importance of specific bacte­rial proteins for intracellular survival, but one group of proteins that are likely to play a key role in granulocyte subversion are those that comprise a ‘type four secretion system’ that exports infection-mediating ‘effector’ pro­teins, including an ankyrin-repeat-domain-containing protein known as AnkA, directly into the host cell cyto­plasm. The function of this, or other effector proteins, may underlie the ability of A. phagocytophilum to inhibit neu­trophil apotosis, thereby prolonging the life span of its niche within a host. Another key mechanism by which A. phagocytophilum appears to prolong infection is through antigenic variation. The surface protein P44 has been found to be immunodominant, but it is now recognized that each bacterium has the ability to express one of about 100 different p44 pseudogenes in its genome, thereby creating antigenic diversity within an infecting A. phago- cytophilum population. Waves of sequentially expressed p44 loci have been documented in experimentally infected animals, and it is thought that the subsidence of waves follows specific host immunological response to them. This feature of A. phagocytophilum has led to it being dubbed a ‘microbial chameleon’, exploiting its ability to change its surface coating to facilitate its persistence within a reservoir host.

Anaplasma marginale, despite its tropism for erythro­cytes rather than neutrophils, shares some virulence traits with A. phagocytophilum. It too possesses a repertoire of p44 pseudogenes, which are expressed in a similar, con­certed, way. Unlike A. phagocytophilum, A. marginale has the capacity to generate genetic mosaics comprising frag­ments of different p 44 pseudogenes, a process that allows the generation of a vast array of antigenic variation within the P44 protein.

Erythrocytes are the only known site of infection of A. marginale. The bacteria reside within membrane-bound inclusions (also called initial bodies), each containing up to eight bacteria. Up to 70% of eryth­rocytes may be parasitized during the early stages of overt infection, but hosts can also maintain far less intense infec­tions subclinically for weeks or months, or possibly indefi­nitely. During overt infection at least, infected erythrocytes are phagocytosed by bovine reticulo-endothelial cells, resulting in development of anaemia. A naplasma centrale and A. ovis also have a tropism for erythrocytes. Anaplasma platys has a tropism for blood platelets, and forms charac­teristic membrane-bound morulae within these cells. However, as with other Anaplasma species, how interaction between parasite and host is mediated remains to be defined.

Ehrlichia canis is a parasite of monocytic cells and, like A. phagocytophilum, within their target cell E. canis resides within membrane-bound inclusions called morulae. How­ever, very little is known about the molecular mechanisms that mediate bacterial interaction with monocytic cells. Genomic analysis has revealed that E. canis, and other Ehrlichia species, possess a locus containing numerous copies of genes that encode for immunodominant 28 kDa outer membrane proteins. Expression studies suggest that some of these genes are preferentially expressed in macro­phages, but their role remains elusive.

Despite the benign nature of infections in reservoir host species, Rickettsia, Anaplasma and Ehrlichia species have the capacity to provoke overt disease, primarily in ‘acci­dental’ hosts (see animal and public health concern sec­tions below). No reports of the pathology associated with infections due to Rickettsia, Anaplasma or Ehrlichia species in European wildlife have been published; thus our knowl­edge of the pathology of these infections is drawn solely from observations in humans, companion animals or live­stock, which, for most species, are accidental hosts.

Many of the clinical signs associated with infections due to Rickettsia species result from damage to the vascular endotheliature and host response to this damage. The pathological outcomes of endothelial cell parasitism include, classically, an increase in vascular permeability leading to haemorrhage, thrombocytopenia and dissemi­nated intravascular coagulation, but also vascular inflam­mation, oedema, increased association between leucocytes and the endothelium and the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines. The pathology associated with A. phagocy- tophilum infections includes splenic lymphoid depletion or hyperplasia. Lymph nodes may exhibit benign histiocy­tosis with lymphopenia or mild paracortical hyperplasia. Mild lymphohistiocytic perivascular infiltrates are typi­cally observed throughout many tissues. A naplasma platys infections can provoke generalized lymph node enlarge­ment, and, histologically, lymph node and splenic lesions consist of lymphoid hyperplasia and plasmacytosis. The reported gross pathology associated with E. canis infections includes petechial and ecchymotic haemorrhages on the serosal and muscosal surfaces of most organs, in conjunc­tion with generalized lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly and hepatomegaly. One of the most characteristic his­topathologic findings is a perivascular plasma cell infiltrate in many tissues.

Infections by Rickettsia, Anaplasma and Ehrlichia species provoke an immune response in both reservoir hosts and accidentally infected hosts. Natural killer cell-derived inter­feron gamma and tumour necrosis factor are fundamental to the innate immune counter of infections through the activation of endothelial cells and macrophages, which are the major target cells for rickettsiae. In addition, as rickett­siae are inoculated through the dermis, resident dendritic cells (DC) play an important role in innate and acquired immunity by effectively presenting rickettsial antigens to T cells. T cells act against Rickettsia spp. in various ways, including the cytotoxic killing of infected target cells and cooperating with B cells in antibody production, which is an important defence against reinfection.

<< | >>
Source: Gavier-Widen D., Meredith A., Duff Paul J. (eds.). Infectious Diseases of Wild Mammals and Birds in Europe. London: Wiley-Blackwell,2012. — 568 p.. 2012
More medical literature on Medic.Studio

More on the topic PATHOGENESIS, PATHOLOGY AND IMMUNITY:

  1. PATHOGENESIS, PATHOLOGY AND IMMUNITY
  2. PATHOGENESIS, PATHOLOGY AND IMMUNITY
  3. PATHOGENESIS, PATHOLOGY AND IMMUNITY
  4. PATHOGENESIS, PATHOLOGY AND IMMUNITY
  5. PATHOGENESIS, PATHOLOGY AND IMMUNITY
  6. Pathogenesis, pathology and immunity
  7. PATHOGENESIS, PATHOLOGY AND IMMUNITY
  8. PATHOGENESIS, PATHOLOGY AND IMMUNITY
  9. PATHOGENESIS, PATHOLOGY AND IMMUNITY
  10. Pathogenesis