<<
>>

Bibliographic Essay

General surveys of Roman representational art include the following: D. Kleiner, Roman Sculpture (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1992); R. Ling, Roman Painting (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991); K.

Dunbabin, Mosaics of the Greek and Roman World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999). The significance of style in pictorial art is addressed by T. Holscher, The Language of Images in Roman Art (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), in which the author examines Hellenistic and Roman battle imagery. The portrayal of war across a variety of media can be found in S. Dillon and K. Welch (eds.), Representations of War in Ancient Rome (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006). Noteworthy studies concerning Roman battle scenes and iconography are as follows: S. Faust, Schlachtenbilder der romischen Kaiserzeit (Rahden: Verlag Marie Leidorf, 2012); G.-C. Picard, ‘L'Ideologie de la guerre et ses monuments dans l'Empire romain', Revue Archeologique 1 (1992), 111-41; T. Schäfer, ‘Romischer Schlachtenbilder', Madrider Mitteilungen 27 (1986), 345-64. The development of war iconography and triumphal display is discussed in the following: P. Holliday, The Origins of Roman Historical Commemoration in the Visual Arts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002); M. Beard, The Roman Triumph (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009); I. Ostenberg, Staging the World: Spoils, Captives, and Representations in the Roman Triumphal Procession (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).

Sources on Roman attitudes towards gladiatorial combat are gathered and discussed in M. Wistrand, Entertainment and Violence in Ancient Rome: The Attitudes of Roman Writers in the First Century CE (Goteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis, 1992). Studies of gladiatorial images in funerary and domestic contexts are offered by M. Flecker, Romische Gladiatorenbilder (Wiesbaden: Ludwig Reichert Verlag, 2015) and M.

Papini, Il Mondo delle immagini deigladiatori (Rome: Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, 2004). Mosaics of gladiatorial combat in domestic settings are addressed by S. Brown, ‘Death as Decoration: Scenes from the Arena on Roman Domestic Mosaics', in A. Richlin (ed.), Pornography and Representation in Greece and Rome (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992), pp. 180-211, and K. Dunbabin, The Mosaics of Roman North Africa (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978).

Representations of violence as a cultural phenomenon within the Second Sophistic are dealt with in the following: H. Morales, ‘The Torturer's Apprentice: Parrhasius and the Limits of Art', in J. Elsner (ed.), Art and Text in Roman Culture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 182-209; H. von den Hoff, ‘Horror and Amazement: Colossal Mythological Statue Groups and the New Rhetoric of Images in Late Second and Early Third Century Rome', in B. Borg (ed.), Paideia: The World of the Second Sophistic (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2004), pp. 105-29; Z. Newby, ‘The Aesthetics of Violence: Myth and Danger in Roman Domestic Landscapes', Classical Antiquity 31.2 (2012), 349-89, which also treats violent myth scenes in Pompeian painting. For more on violent scenes in Pompeian painting, see D. Frederick, ‘Beyond the Atrium to Ariadne: Erotic Painting and Visual Pleasure in the Roman House', Classical Antiquity 14.2 (1995), 266-88; A. Koloski-Ostrow, ‘Violent Stages in Two Pompeian Houses: Imperial Taste, Aristocratic Response, and Messages of Male Control', in A. Koloski-Ostrow and C. Lyons (eds.), Naked Truths: Women, Sexuality, and Gender in Classical Art and Archaeology (London: Routledge, 1997), pp. 243-66; B. Severy-Hoven, ‘Master Narratives and the Wall Painting of the House of the Vettii, Pompeii', Gender & History 24.3 (2012), 540-80, with an excellent summary of the use of feminist theory and film criticism in scholarship on Roman painting since the publication of L. Mulvey's Visual and Other Pleasures (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1989).Finally, violent myth scenes on sarcophagi are catalogued and discussed in P. Zanker and C. Ewald, Living with Myths (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), while the specific meaning of the Medea myth is analysed in G. Gessert, ‘Myth as Consolatio: Medea on Roman Sarcophagi', Greece & Rome 51.2 (2004), 217-49.

<< | >>
Source: Fagan Garrett G., Fibiger Linda, Hudson Mark, Trundle Matthew (eds.). The Cambridge World History of Violence. Volume 1: The Prehistoric and Ancient Worlds. Cambridge University Press,2020. — 756 p.. 2020

More on the topic Bibliographic Essay:

  1. Bibliographic Essay
  2. Bibliographic Essay
  3. Bibliographic Essay
  4. Bibliographic Essay
  5. Bibliographic Essay
  6. Bibliographic Essay
  7. Bibliographic Essay
  8. Bibliographic Essay
  9. Bibliographic Essay
  10. Bibliographic Essay
  11. Bibliographic Essay
  12. Bibliographic Essay
  13. Bibliographic Essay
  14. Bibliographic Essay
  15. Bibliographic Essay
  16. Bibliographic Essay
  17. Bibliographic Essay