Violence was an accepted part of life in ancient Mesopotamia.
Wars raged across the Near East in the ‘campaign season' during the hot months that followed the harvest, crime was often penalised by corporal and capital forms of punishment, and rituals and some medical practices included the killing of a scapegoat to restore order and purity to a fouled person or situation.[920] However, the ritualised killing of humans in Mesopotamian society was a rare occurrence and, as far as can be deduced from the evidence, there were only two institutionalised practices of human sacrifice: the killing of the royal retinue at the death of the kings and queens of Ur during the Early Dynastic period; and the substitute king ritual, which was practised sporadically in the second and first millennia bce.
Beyond these cases, there is little evidence for the practice of human sacrifice in ancient Mesopotamia and thus it seems to have been a part of the royal prerogative in only the most extreme circumstances. This chapter will examine the institutionalised practices of human sacrifice in ancient Mesopotamia so as to understand them in their historical and cultural contexts. In so doing it hopes to offer a better understanding of this most extreme form of ritual violence.Before proceeding a clarification should be made about the term ‘cultures of Mesopotamia'. This chapter concentrates on the period from the mid third millennium down to the last centuries of the first millennium bce, which saw significant cultural and political changes in ancient Iraq. During the third millennium bce Sumerian-speaking societies ruled the south of Iraq and societies that spoke the Semitic Akkadian language lived in the region to the north around modern-day Baghdad. During the early second millennium bce the city of Babylon and other cities of the south came to replace the Sumerian and Akkadian cultures as the dominant power of the region. While this shift saw significant political and, to a lesser extent, linguistic changes (Babylonian is a major dialect of Akkadian), there is clear cultural continuity between the Sumerians and Babylonians to the extent that scholars often refer to ‘Sumero-Babylonian' culture, particularly in the area of religion and royal ideology. At the same time as the Babylonian culture became dominant in southern Mesopotamia, the Assyrians (also speakers of a major dialect of Akkadian) emerged in the Upper Tigris Valley in northern Iraq. The Assyrian culture was closely related to the Sumero-Babylonian cultures and by the age of empires in the first millennium bce the two major cultures of Mesopotamia had become intermingled.
More on the topic Violence was an accepted part of life in ancient Mesopotamia.:
- Part One Ancient Mesopotamia and Ancient Egypt
- Representations of Violence in Ancient Mesopotamia and Syria
- Mesopotamia and Syria encomipass a wide area of the ancient Near East.
- Imperial Chinese society accepted and even lauded certain types of violence. Fundamental views of sanctioned violence developed in reaction to that culture's particular views of masculinity.
- Ancient Mesopotamia and Egyp
- 11 PHYSIOGNOMY IN ANCIENT MESOPOTAMIA AND BEYOND: FROM PRACTICE TO HANDBOOK
- CHAPTER 5 Demons at Work in Ancient Mesopotamia
- Violence and State Power in Early Mesopotamia
- Violence and representations of violence abound in the literature of ancient and late antique Judaism and Christianity.
- Within the world history of violence the Bible is relevant for our reconstructions of the lived experience of violence among ancient Israelites and Judeans;
- Warfare and violence were central to the identity and experience of early states in the ancient Near East.
- PART II PREHISTORIC AND ANCIENT WARFARE
- Part ii: Ancient Demons and Modern Germs
- Violence in Ancient Egyptian Society
- Ritual Violence among the Ancient Maya