Appropriating Traditions
The force John's presentation of Jesus would have had for his community hinges to a significant degree on the well's patriarchal heritage. Jesus's offer of “living water” (4.10), after first meeting with incredulity (“Sir you have nothing to draw water with, and the well is deep.
Where do you get that living water?” [4:11]), elicits a comparison to Jacob: “Are you greater than our father Jacob? He gave us the well and drank from it himself, as did his sons and his livestock” (4:12).[317] Traditions about the wider setting of the well help elucidate this comparison. According to Genesis, “Jacob came safely to the city of Shechem [Tell Balatah]... [and] bought... the piece of land on which he had pitched his tent... [where] he erected an altar” (33:18-20; cf. 48:22). While there is no mention of a well in the passage, wells figure prominently elsewhere in the patriarchal narratives, symbolizing divine favor in addition to provision.[318] These wider traditions bestow a biblical coherence on the Samaritan woman's association of the well with Jacob. Thus, John's readers would have perceived that the well provided Samaritans with a tangible link to the patriarch (Jacob “gave us the well” [4:12]), and with it divine legitimation.But John's account depicts the superiority of Jesus to the Jacob traditions. This is typical of the Fourth Gospel, which often compares its protagonist favorably to luminaries such as Moses and Abraham.[319] Notably, the narrative in John 4 does not take direct issue with the well's patriarchal heritage but rather relies on its potency to press home the eminence of Jesus, demonstrated through the superiority of his gift. In contrast to the water one receives through lowering a bucket into the well (φρέαρ), Jesus's offering becomes its own “spring of water” (πηγή ΰδατος) in the recipient, welling up (άλλομένου) to eternal life (vv. 13-14).
Insofar as it can be internalized and continually accessed, Jesus's gift of living water outstrips the value of water drawn from Jacob's well.[320] By extension, Jesus offers legitimation even more potent than that provided by the patriarch Jacob (4:12).The political dimensions of Jesus's gift, along with their implications for John's community, come to light with the narrative's allusion to further traditions. These concern Samaria's history as a colonized territory and emerge via Jesus's diagnosis of the Samaritan woman's condition: “you have had five husbands, and the one you now have is not your husband” (4:18). The reference to five husbands along with a contemporary extramarital dalliance functions as an allegory for Samaria's submission to various peoples under Assyria (2 Kgs 17:24; Josephus, A.J. 9.288) and the present experience of Roman hegemony (Koester 1990, 675).[321] The special knowledge required to render this assessment of the woman's/Samaria's condition earns Jesus recognition as a prophet (4:19).[322] But just as critical, the narrative offers an implied contrast between the rule of colonizing powers and Jesus, whose gift promises a more fulfilling life. Thus, though the countercultural nature of Jesus's promise reaches new heights in the subsequent portions of John 4 (see below), it is already implicated here in the comparisons offered. Jesus ought to be the sole source of legitimation and life for the evangelist's community. What John envisages such loyalty to entail for these Jesus followers, living in the shadow of Rome, emerges when Jesus takes up the spatial dimensions of worship.
More on the topic Appropriating Traditions:
- Appropriating Traditions
- Appropriating Traditions
- Performance Traditions
- The Fountain of Glauke
- The Liquidation of Religious Traditions
- Jason Bruner
- ORAL AND TEXTUAL TRADITIONS
- The Esoteric Traditions and Antinomian Movements
- Accommodation and appropriation
- Conclusion