Enumeration of MAP
Estimation of the number of MAP organisms that are present in a clinical sample can be used to determine the level of risk posed by livestock through contamination of the environment.
In research, accurate enumeration of MAP is often needed, for example in experimental infection models to enable a repeatable dose of inoculum between trials, and in vaccine efficacy experiments to study faecal shedding rates between vaccinates and controls (Reddacliff et al., 2006a; Begg and Whittington, 2008). This topic was recently reviewed by Marquetoux et al. (2019).Direct microscopic cell counts measure the total number of cells while PCR-based methods measure total DNA levels, which can be related back to the total number of MAP cells. Both of these methods tend to overestimate counts by including both live and dead cells. In contrast, culture-based methods provide an estimate of the number of viable cells. Direct colony counts on HEYM slopes have often been used. Turbidimetric estimates, most probable number (MPN) estimates or time to growth are applicable to liquid cultures. As MAP tends to clump in suspension, counts from suspensions can be underestimates and considerable effort is required to achieve thorough dispersion of cells.
Turbidimetric estimates are only suitable for high concentrations of cells - one absorbance unit at 600 nm corresponds to a concentration of about 108 cells/ml (Shin et al., 2007). Most probable number methods are applicable over a wide range of cell numbers but require the culture of replicates of a serial dilution through to an endpoint, which is the highest dilution before growth no longer occurs; thus they are very costly in terms of media (Whittington et al., 2000b; Reddacliff et al., 2003a). Estimation of count by the time to growth in radiometric BACTEC 12B medium is based on the observation that generation time is proportional to inoculum size; this is less susceptible than other methods to error through bacterial clumping, is highly sensitive, can be done with a single culture vial and is applicable to a range of sample types and strains of MAP (Lambrecht et al., 1988; Reddacliff et al., 2003a). The same approach has been used in MGIT media (Shin et al., 2007; Abendano et al.,
2012). Time to detection in the Trek ESP system is also related to inoculum size (Kim et al., 2002). Colony counts are likely to substantially underestimate the actual count relative to MPN counts or time to growth in liquid media (Reddacliff et al., 2003a), although there was close correlation between counts on HEYM, BACTEC 12B medium and MGIT medium in one study (Shin et al., 2007).
To study pathogenesis and provide an indirect measure of vaccine efficacy, Pooley et al. (2016) developed a liquid culture-based method for enumeration of MAP in intracellular infection assays; it required a 2-week incubation and had a PCR readout.
18.13
More on the topic Enumeration of MAP:
- Genomic Epidemiology of MAP
- Study of MAP Proteins
- Cultural Requirements of Different Strains of MAP
- Survival of MAP During Dairy Processing
- Comparison of the Virulence and Pathogenicity of MAP Strains
- Innate Response to MAP Infection
- Genomic Comparison of MAP Strains
- MAP Antigens
- General Principles for the Cultivation of MAP
- MAP Drug Susceptibility Testing: Where Are We in 2019?
- Resuscitation of MAP and Growth Stimulation
- Evidence of MAP in Animal- Derived Foods
- THE ANCIENT EGYPTIAN MAP
- Drug Susceptibility Testing for MAP, Why Bother?
- Detection of MAP in Crohn’s Disease Patients
- Pathogenesis and Stages of MAP Infection in Cattle