Civil Bureaucracy and Embassies
By the time of the establishment of the new Jin khanate capital at Shenyang (after 1634 called Mukden) in the early 1620s, the employment of literate Chinese men was not a complete novelty.
The early records of the khanate make clear that Chinese-speaking men, whatever their ancestry, had been important in the running of the ruler's household when it was based in Jilin, making trade agreements final, and managing communications with the officials of Ming China and Yi Korea. Men literate in Chinese occasionally wrote letters on behalf of the khan. But the acquisition of the Ming provincial government—its buildings, some of its documents, and a large number of officials—meant the initiation of a new Qing government based upon the Chinese bureaucracies. In the early stages this government was primarily responsible for management of civil law proclamations, the civil courts, census taking among the Liaodong conquered population, and the writing of history. It also undertook responsibility for the administration of an examination system, in principle modeled on the traditional examination system by which Chinese officials were made eligible for employment. From its inception, a portion of the traditional Chinese examination curriculum featuring memorization and commentary of parts of the “Four Books” (translated into Manchu and later into Mongolian) figured in the Qing trilingual examinations; after the conquest of Beijing, the curriculum was further standardized to the traditional civil examinations, though translation (sometimes optional) remained a component of the examination and appointment process for the entire Qing period. A board (headed by Manchus) overseeing the examinations was first established in 1634, and examinations began to be administered in the year of the announcement of the empire, 1636, and along with this a new department handling civil official appointments.[1992]The nature of the conquest of Liaodong required that the two governments coordinate on some matters, and the pattern through the entire Qing period was that overlap or redundancy could frequently be found in the relationships among the governments.
Nurgaci's requirement in Liaodong was that all men, whether military or civilian, adopt the traditional Jurchen hairstyle and dress. His expressed intention was that his population not be riven by cultural distinctions or the disparate loyalties that such distinctions would imply. In time the dress requirements were relaxed, but the traditional Manchu queue remained until the end of the dynasty, and was extended to conquered populations as the empire expanded. Before the establishment of garrisons for the occupying force, the civil government oversaw a period of forced cohabitation in Liaodong. Until abandonment of the policy in 1635, the volume of legal difficulties it created fed the enlargement of the legal offices in both the Eight Banners and the civilian governments.[1993] It was the civilian government that was the medium through which the Qing conquerors presented themselves to the conquered population as the benevolent rulers prescribed by Chinese tradition. The emperor's ability to function as a protective father to the population was explicitly contrasted to the Ming court's failure to protect the Liaodong population either from native bandits or from foreign conquerors. This construction of the Qing ruler as a righteous emperor in the Chinese mode was accomplished through Chinese- language pronouncements, some basic standard Chinese court ritual, and acknowledgment of Chinese festivals.This civilian government was most dramatically affected by the Qing conquest of north China in 1644/1645. By a complex process (which remained the subject of imperial judgment and revised judgment through the eighteenth century), Chinese civilian officials with personal histories of service to the former Ming Empire—or both the Ming and the Li Zicheng rebel state that had displaced it—were brought into service of the Qing.[1994] A majority were employed and kept under some significant level of surveillance at the new imperial court in Beijing. The occupied provinces were generally overseen by Chinese-martial, who assumed governorships and often supplied their own relatives or associates to local government roles.[1995] Not until the 1670s and later did the civilian government of the Qing in China become open to regular appointments of civilian Chinese men, who by then were accredited through a traditional examination system.
At the highest level of the Qing bureaucracy, the Hanlin Academy, officials were expected to read Manchu as well as Chinese, since both languages were necessary to the business of the imperial court. But at the level of the usual central offices for history, law, maintenance of public works, census-taking and tax collection, and civil appointments, the civil bureaucracy of the Qing functioned along the same general lines as had the Ming civil bureaucracy before it. It used Chinese as its administrative language and addressed the emperor through the rituals and in fact the same physical venues in Beijing.This civil government had built within it a tradition, method, and locality (the Ministry of Rites, libu) for the reception of foreign visitors. “Guest ritual” (binli) rooted in classical history was the method by which ambassadors from foreign states were received at court. The offices managing visits to this court included a translation bureau, whose efficacy in the Ming and the Qing is dubious. A central feature of these guest rituals was the exchange of goods and the ritual obeisance of the visitor to the imperial throne (as illustrated on the cover of this volume). The ceremonies were an expression of, but not the substance of, a loose network of trade, patronage, political alliance, and occasionally strategic relationships across East and Southeast Asia. In the Ming and some earlier periods the use of these ritual halls and practices seems to have loosely replicated the early role of the Zhou rulers as the supreme moral intercessors between Heaven and humanity, but it is possible that in the Qing period the rituals were interpreted more as the act of sovereign rulers acknowledging the supremacy of a primus inter pares.[1996] In any case, this office was a province of the Ming-derived civil government, and facilitated the expression of the Qing rulers in a continuing role with the Ming rulers as masters of the guest ritual. It was not in any practical terms the central avenue of economic or even political relations; Portuguese merchants and ambassadors, for instance, had pursued complicated relations with the Ming court, and Portugal had a trade relationship with the south Chinese coast, but Portugal was not listed as an embassy state.
Under the Qing, Korea retained its rank at the top of the list, giving it the most frequent visits to the court and most opportunity for discussion of trade and strategic issues, while the Liuqiu/Ryukyu Islands and Annam ranked high on both Ming and Qing lists. However, the list of embassies received through the civil court during the Qing was much shorter and more focused than the Ming list before it. Japan was a very high- ranking embassy state of the Ming, and did not send embassies to the Qing court at all (partly because the Tokugawa shogunate had outlawed foreign trade). European imperial expansion in East Asia removed the Philippines from the Qing list; the same was true for Indonesian states with the exception of Sulu. Ottoman expansion removed the Ming embassy states of Mecca and Medina. Qing conquests in Mongolia and Eastern Turkestan removed many of the federations and city-states of those regions who had sent embassies to Ming. On the other hand, while Europe had been represented in the Ming list by only the Vatican and the Netherlands, the Qing guest courts were visited by embassies from Britain, the Netherlands, Portugal, the Vatican, and Russia. The last-named is a reminder that, as in many legal affairs, foreign relations could also seep between the Qing governments—in this case, between the civil government and the Frontiers Department, until 1861.
More on the topic Civil Bureaucracy and Embassies:
- Bureaucracy in the development process
- The development of a modern bureaucracy
- The Imperial Bureaucracy
- A Dance of Bureaucracy
- 7 Law, Bureaucracy, and the Practice of Government and Rule
- Civil-Military Relations in the US
- Rules of Civil Litigation
- I CIVIL PROCEDURE IN THE CLASSICAL PERIOD
- From Peace Activism to Civil Defense Protests
- Civil Society
- Civil Affairs Missions in Operations Other Than War
- The Pros and Cons of Civil Procedure
- Civilian Soldiers and Civil Affairs
- The Reconstruction of White Supremacy in Post-Civil War America
- Racial Violence and Government Response in the Civil Rights Era and Beyond
- 2. Roman Law in the Modern Civil Codes
- After the Civil War: Manifest Destiny Re-evaluated