<<
>>

Send in the Marines

This ethnographic study of the cultural management of and ability to endure pain in the U.S. Marine Corps was carried out over a period of two and one-half years (1992-1994) at three different field sites in the United States.

Among other things, I explored what it

means to be physically and emotionally “broken” in such an organization which places a primacy on physical prowess, performance, and the ability to bear pain—just in order to belong and achieve membership, as a man or woman, and for the organizational mission.

Also, the Marines make no secret of breaking a young man down. That was stated explicitly to us the day we hit San Diego. The first thing to go was hair. After the haircut (so fast and so rough, our scalps were bleeding from the electric clippers), we were obviously all alike. And no one was allowed to use any personal pronouns when a DI (drill instructor) was present. “Sir, the private wishes to speak to the drill instructor, sir!” (Anonymous ex­Marine, 2003)

When I interviewed Lance Corporal “Hays” over several sessions, he eventually told me how his own earlier personal experiences with physical injury potentially compro­mised the mission of the Corps. He was unable to physically perform, and to a certain degree blamed himself for the persistence of his injury. His self-blame for physical injury had both emotional and mental components. Three operations and several months of physical therapy later, he talked with me about his attempts to finish boot camp. How­ever, due to his physical injuries, Hays often spoke about being recycled if he did not heal after his most recent operation.

Connell (1990), among others, has argued that there has been very little work that ac­tively explores the processes through which masculinity is socially constructed. There is even less research exploring the relationships between masculinity, femininity, and the enduring of pain in the U.S. Marine Corps. The USMC presents a fascinating case study of the manner in which the social construction of gender and its relationship to pain gets “played out” on the terrain of identities, emotions, and bodies—specifically what it means and how it feels to be both physically and emotionally “broken” in the most so­cially conservative of the U.S. military organizations.

Infantrymen (both injured and non-injured) in the U.S. Marines subscribe to a culture where the bearing of pain is expected and normalized within the following contexts: through the socialization to become a Marine, in training for the mission, and through an intense personal and organizational experience of transformation of the body, emotions, identity, and mind. The cultural context of physical injury for injured enlisted infantry­men represents a space where both masculine and Marine identity are continuously chal­lenged and renegotiated.

<< | >>
Source: Anderson M. (ed.). Cultural Shaping of Violence: Victimization, Escalation, Response. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press,2004. — 330 p.. 2004

More on the topic Send in the Marines:

  1. Understanding Marines
  2. Chapter XVI Being Broken in the Marines: The Social Construction of Belonging in the U.S. Marine Corps
  3. Bills of exchange and banker's acceptances are instruments that are particu­larly useful in helping to oil the wheels of international commerce.
  4. The La y of Ihor ys Campaign
  5. Being Broken
  6. A Question of Value
  7. Conclusion
  8. Other Stigmatized Identities
  9. From gunboat diplomacy to the 'Good Neighbor' Policy
  10. The more signs of a victim an individual bears, the more likely he is to attract disaster.
  11. Pan-Americanism and the approach of war
  12. The Ambiguity of Limited War
  13. If John Darwin is right to claim that empire is the default mode of politics in the history of the world, then the task given to me is well nigh impossible.1
  14. The Exodus From Egypt
  15. Hieroglyphs and Cuneiform
  16. Self-regulation of the social organism
  17. Border Battles and a Stalemate
  18. UKRAINE IN THE POST-PETRINE PERIOD