The application of management accounting in micro and small enterprises
V. Suryaputra
Parahyangan Catholic University, Bandung, Indonesia
ABSTRACT: The purpose of this research is to investigate how management accounting is applied in micro and small enterprises in Bandung and its surrounding areas in Indonesia.
To this end, a descriptive study was conducted. The findings indicated that the application of management accounting in micro and small enterprises was rather limited to simple accounting techniques. Data were collected through questionnaires and interviews. Since the respondents of this research were mostly micro and small enterprises in the culinary industry, generalization to a wider context could not be made.1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
The growth of micro and small enterprises (MSEs) in Indonesia has been mushrooming. They create a strong competition both between themselves and with medium and large enterprises. In order to win the competition and keep the business going, the MSEs must be highly productive. However, Mourougane’s (2012) work indicates that micro, small and medium enterprises play in Indonesia are still struggling with productivity problems.
Studies have shown that management accounting can affect MSE performance (e.g., Ahmad 2017; Shields & Shelleman 2016). The more often the management accounting system is used to calculate the profitability of products or services and to assess the profitability of customers, the more positive and significant the impacts on return on investment are. This seems to imply that the application of management accounting can improve MSE performance.
The present research attempts to investigate how management accounting is applied in MSEs in Indonesia. It is expected that the findings can help improve their performance and productivity. This research is also particularly useful for other researchers whose interests and concerns are related in one way or another to the field of the same kind as that of this research.
2 RESEARCH METHOD
This research employed a descriptive study design. The aim was to describe the application of management accounting in micro and small enterprises in Indonesia. The samples were 30 micro and small enterprises in Bandung selected out of 300 thousand (data from www.jabarprov.go.id) randomly. Data were collected through questionnaires and interviews in January - June 2018.
3 SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES (SMES)
In Indonesia, small and medium enterprises (SMEs) are defined in many different ways and from many different perspectives.
1) Ministry of Cooperatives and Small and Medium Enterprises (Menegkop and UKM) classifies MSMEs based on their net worth as follows:
• A small enterprise (UK), including Micro Enterprises (UMI), is a business entity having a net worth of IDR 200,000,000, excluding land and building of business premises, and has annual sales of up to IDR 1,000,000,000.
• A medium enterprises (UM) is a business entity owned by an Indonesian citizen with a net worth between IDR 200,000,000 and IDR 10,000,000,000, excluding land and buildings.
2) Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 of 2008 defines SMEs based on the amount of assets and turnover per year as follows:
• A micro enterprise is a productive business owned by individual and/or individual business entity fulfilling micro business criteria as regulated in this law.
• A small-scale business is a stand-alone productive economic enterprise conducted by an individual or a business entity that is not a subsidiary or not a company owned, controlled, or a part, directly or indirectly, of a mediumsized or large-scale business that meets the criteria small business as referred to in this law.
• A medium-sized enterprise is a stand-alone productive economic enterprise, carried out by an individual or a business entity that is not a subsidiary or not a company owned, controlled, or a part, directly or indirectly, of a small business or large business with net worth or annual sales proceeds as provided in this law.
Table 1.
Classification of enterprise Based on Net Worth| and Annual Sales. | ||
| Type of enterprise | Net Worth (excluding land and business building) | Annual sales |
| Micro Enterprise Small Enterprise Medium Enterprise | Max. IDR 50millions > IDR 50 million - IDR500 millions > IDR 500 million - IDR 10 billion | Max. IDR 300 million > IDR 300 million - IDR 2.5 billion >IDR 2.5 billion - IDR 50 billion |
| Source: Law Number 20 Year 2008. | ||
3) Bank Indonesia through Bank Indonesia Circular Letter no. 3/9/Bkr of 2001 defines a small business by referring to Law No. 9 of 1995, which is small scale business criteria based on fixed asset value (excluding lands and buildings) of IDR 200 million with maximum turnover per year of IDR 1 billion. Based on Presidential Decree No.10 of 1999 on medium enterprises, the maximum fixed asset criterion (excluding land and buildings) of a medium business ranges between IDR 200 million and IDR 10 billion.
4) According to the Ministry of Industry and Trade, businesses with asset value (excluding land and buildings) of less than IDR 200 million are called small industries, whereas a business with asset between IDR 200 million and IDR 5 billion is classified as a small and medium enterprise.
5) Ministry of Finance, through Ministerial Decree number 316/KMK.016/1994 dated June 27, 1994, defines a small business as an individual or business entity that has engaged in business/sales turnover per year as high as IDR 600,000,000 or assets of up to IDR 600,000,000 (excluding land and buildings occupied). They could be:
a. Field of business (Fa, CV, PT, and cooperative), and
b. Individuals (craftsmen/home industry, farmers, fishermen, forest encroachers, miners, traders of goods and services).
6) Statistics Indonesia (BPS) classifies a business based on the number of workers as follows:
• Micro-enterprises (households) are businesses with 1-5 people.
• Small businesses are businesses with 6-19 employees.
• Medium enterprises have 20-99 employees.
• Large businesses have workers at least 100 people.
In this study, small and medium micro enterprises are defined based on their annual turnover in accordance with Law No.20 of 2008 and based on the number of employees according to Statistics Indonesia.
4 MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING
Management accounting helps managers with their financial statement creation (Horngren et al. 2015). According to Management Accounting Practices Committee (MAPC) management accounting is the process of identification, measurement, analysis, preparation and communication of financial information used by management for planning, evaluation, control in an organization and to ensure the ac-curacy of the use of resources and accountability.
The purpose of management accounting is to help managers plan and control the company’s current operations and hence helps make specific decisions and long-term plans (Horngren 1962). Management accounting is broader than cost accounting and is used for planning and control (Williams 1986).
The role of accounting is to help managers and professionals with the planning and controls within an organization and does not merely perform a bookkeeping function (Birnberg 2011). Management accounting is different from cost accounting. Cost accounting is concerned with the cost measurement of the product whereas management accounting is rather a managerial-related activity (2003).
According to Keong (1997), the primary purpose of management accounting is to ensure that we un-der- stand how internal information in the form of fi-nancial data can be used to help businesses generate more profit. Kaplan and Johnson in a book entitled Relevance Lost advised the Chief Financial Officer established a simplified accounting management sys-tem to help them make important decisions (Pearl-stein 1988).
With the use of management account-ing, companies or managers can create their own management accounting system suitable with their needs and can support decision making processes.Management accounting is an abstract construct; therefore, the application of management accounting is usually seen from the use of methods (techniques) such as cost calculations, planning in the form of budget, control in the form of variance (compare actual results with budget).
4.1 The use of management accounting outside Indonesia
Laureano et al (2016) conducted a study of management accounting practices in SMEs in Portugal, to find out which SMEs in Portugal belong to which category of Kaplan’s four stage model. The Kaplan model groups companies based on the level of development of their management accounting practices. Stage 1 uses insufficient methods for financial reporting needs, stage 2 implements methods for financial reporting, stage 3 produces innovation and is relevant for management, stage 4 integration. The re-search results show that all studied SMEs have implemented management accounting methods for product valuation, but the method used is considered inadequate for decision making, 24.14% of them do valuation of products using direct cost, the rest using the basis of allocations relating to the amount of production, usually using machine hours. None is using activity-based costing.
Studies on management accounting practices in SMEs were also conducted in Romania. The results of Cuzdriorean’s (2017) study; for example, indicate that most respondents use some (slightly) traditional management accounting methods, while modern accounting method uses are rather limited. The most commonly used traditional management accounting methods are budgeting systems for cost control and cash flow planning. The commonly used modern management accounting methods are benchmarking and reporting performance based on financial and non-financial size.
The results of a survey of 226 SMEs in Italy show that there is a positive correlation between firm size and diffusion of management accounting tools.
The most widely used accounting management tools are cost analysis, budget and cash flow budget. And the use of business plan, gross margin contribution and analysis ofvariance is limited (Broccardo 2014).Ahmad and Zabri (2015) conducted research on the application of management accounting in medium-sized businesses in Malaysia. The results indicate that the use of costing system, budgeting system, and performance evaluation system is significantly higher than decision support and strategic management accounting. Traditional management accounting practice (MAP) is more commonly used than sophisticated MAP.
Shields and Shelleman’s (2016) research on the application of management accounting in micro enterprises in the US suggests that management accounting systems are implemented to facilitate decision making, including calculating the profitability of products/services, taking action based on actual and budget performance comparisons, and assessment of customer profitability.
McChlery et al. (2005) conducted research on small business in Scotland. The results showed that only 54.8% of respondents made estimates of profits, and 53.6% made estimates of cash. Only 48.1% compared the budget with the actual results. 36.8% of respondents did not have a product cost calculation system.
It can be concluded that some SMEs in the abovementioned countries demonstrate a limited technique use of management accounting, usually in the form of simple product cost and budget calculations.
4.2 The use of management accounting in Indonesia
There were several studies related to the use of management accounting in small and medium enterprises in Indonesia. For example, Alliyah and Hidayat’s (2014) study indicate that 186 small and medium enterprises in Rembang Regency have implemented management accounting system. The study on 82 SMEs in Surabaya shows that, on a scale of 1-5, the measurement of management accounting resulted in the average score of 2.1265 (low) (Surenggono & Djamilah 2016). 19 small and medium businesses in Yogyakarta are reported to use management accounting for planning, control, and decision making, (Wirjono & Rahar- jono 2012). Research on 8 businesses of enting-enting gepuk in Salatiga indicates that the information used for business decision making is sales/income information, purchase information, cost information, profit and loss information, cash inflow information, and inventory amount information (Christian & Rita 2016). Purwati et al (2014) found that small and medium enterprises in Banyumas used management accounting make financial statements as requirements for proposing bank loans (Purwati et al. 2014).
The abovementioned studies may lead to a conclusion that management accounting helps SMEs with decision making processes.
4.3 Management accounting indicators
Scholars used different indicators for management accounting. Shield and Shelleman (2016) use the ability to calculate products/services, take remedial action if actual performance is not profitable relative to budgeted performance, assess customer profitability, compare actual and budgeted performance, calculate differences between actual and budgeted amounts, evaluate performance relative to the target, calculate breakeven point, prepare operating budget, use operating budget to set performance targets, assess customer costs. Ahmad (2017) uses Costing System, Budgeting system, Performance Measurement System, Decision Support System, Strategic Management Accounting. Wijewardena et al (2004) uses the use of budget and variance. Chand and Ambardar use (2013) Costing System, Budgeting System, Performance evaluation, information and decision making, strategic analysis. Chiarini uses (2012) activity-based costing.
The following are indicators this study considered appropriate is considered able to describe the use of management accounting in micro, small, and medium enterprises.
1) Calculation of product cost
2) Calculation of product profits
3) The calculation of customer profit
4) Preparing a sales plan
5) Production cost plan
6) Making operational cost plan
7) Creating a profit plan
8) Making cash usage plans
9) Making cash usage plans
10) Evaluate expenses
11) Compare sales results with sales plans
12) Compare production costs with production cost plans
13) Compare profit with profit plan
14) Calculate breakeven point
15) Compare the selling price with competitors
16) Compare product costs with competitors
5 DATA AND ANALYSIS
The number of returned questionnaires was 30. The results reveal that the maximum annual sales of the respondents were three hundred million rupiah, and hence they can be categorized into micro enterprises. As for the number of employees, 22 respondents who had 1-5 employees, seven respondents 6-19 employees, and one respondent had 20 employees. Therefore, based on the classification according to the number of employees, there were 22 micro enterprises, seven small enterprises, and one medium enterprise. Based on the type of business, there were 16 respondents doing the manufacturing businesses, six respondents doing trading businesses, and eight respondents doing service businesses.
All of these respondents used management accounting. Respondents with the manufacturing business use more management accounting techniques than respondents with the trading and service businesses. Respondents with the of manufacturing business used 10 management accounting techniques on average (65% of the total 16 management accounting techniques), respondents with the service businesses used 9 management accounting techniques (63% of the total 14 management accounting techniques), and respondents with trading businesses used 7 management accounting techniques (49% of the 14 management accounting techniques). These findings seem to confirm previous studies on small and medium enterprises in Indonesia.
Table 2. The use of management accounting based on kind of business.
| Kind of business | Number of respondents | Averang score | % |
| Trading | 6 | 6.83 | 48.81% |
| Manufacturing | 16 | 10.38 | 64.84% |
| Service | 8 | 8.75 | 62.50% |
The most commonly used management accounting technique were calculation of product costs (80%), comparing the selling price with competitors (77%) and profit calculation (73%). And the most rarely used management accounting technique is comparing actual and target profit (40%), comparing actual production costs and production cost plans (44%) and making operational costing plans (50%). Most respondents seem to use the cost accounting technique (calculating product cost, calculating profit) and not to maximize the use of management accounting. This is in agreement with findings of studies on SMEs conducted outside Indonesia that SMEs usually use simple management accounting methods.
Table 3. Management Accounting Techniques used by respondent.
| Question no. | Description | Number of respondents | % |
| 1 | Calculation of product cost | 24 | 80.00% |
| 2 | Calculation of product profits | 22 | 73.33% |
| 3 | The calculation of customer profit | 18 | 60.00% |
| 4 | Preparing a sales plan | 20 | 66.67% |
| 5 | Production cost plan | 11 | 68.75% |
| 6 | Making operational cost plan | 15 | 50.00% |
| 7 | Creating a profit plan | 18 | 60.00% |
| 8 | Making cash usage plans | 18 | 60.00% |
| 9 | Making cash usage plans | 18 | 60.00% |
| 10 | Evaluate expenses | 18 | 60.00% |
| 11 | Compare sales results with sales plans | 18 | 60.00% |
| 12 | Compare production costs with production cost plans | 7 | 43.75% |
| 13 | Compare profit with profit plan | 12 | 40.00% |
| 14 | Calculate breakeven point | 17 | 56.67% |
| 15 | Compare the selling price with competitors | 23 | 76.67% |
| 16 | Compare product costs with competitors | 18 | 60.00% |
6 VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY TEST
The item validity test was performed using Pearson Product Moment, with a significance level of 5%. The results revealed that all the questionnaire items were valid
Table 4. Result of validity test.
| Question no. | Rxy | t calculation | t table (95%,28) | Description on |
| 1 | 0.48594659 | 2.942129821 | 1.701130934 | valid |
| 2 | 0.418446644 | 2.437910849 | 1.701130934 | valid |
| 3 | 0.457298535 | 2.720971949 | 1.701130934 | valid |
| 4 | 0.687232258 | 5.005922704 | 1.701130934 | valid |
| 5 | 0.568310418 | 3.654793432 | 1.701130934 | valid |
| 6 | 0.420055527 | 2.449287964 | 1.701130934 | valid |
| 7 | 0.356423858 | 2.018589941 | 1.701130934 | valid |
| 8 | 0.675860335 | bgcolor=white>4.852337211.701130934 | valid | |
| 9 | 0.52454832 | 3.260173595 | 1.701130934 | valid |
| 10 | 0.541360766 | 3.407046348 | 1.701130934 | valid |
| 11 | 0.659047889 | 4.636815714 | 1.701130934 | valid |
| 12 | 0.540995154 | 3.40379283 | 1.701130934 | valid |
| 13 | 0.467386003 | 2.797539606 | 1.701130934 | valid |
| 14 | 0.625510108 | 4.24227151 | 1.701130934 | valid |
| 15 | 0.448540473 | 2.655574641 | 1.701130934 | valid |
| 16 | 0.60861055 | 4.058714271 | 1.701130934 | valid |
Reliability test is done using the split half method. The results showed that the questionnaire was highly reliable.
7 CONCLUSION
Micro and small enterprises in Bandung and its surrounding areas were found to have implemented management accounting. The most commonly used management accounting techniques were calculating product cost, calculating profit, and comparing selling price with competitors. The most rarely used techniques were comparing actual profit with pro fit plans, comparing actual production costs and production cost plans. Most respondents used simple management accounting techniques such as cost accounting, as stated by Horngren, cannot help organizations with the decision-making and long-term budgeting processes. The results of this study cannot be generalized to describe the condition of management accounting application in small and medium micro enterprise in Indonesia or in Bandung and surrounding areas. more in-depth research is needed with larger numbers of respondents.
REFERENCES
Ahmad, K. 2017. The Implementation of Management Accounting Practices and its Relationship with Performance in Small and Medium Enterprises. International Review of Management and Marketing: 342-353.
Ahmad, K., & Zabri, S. M. 2015. Factors explaining the use of management accounting practices in Malaysian medium-sized firms. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 22(4): 762-781.
Alliyah, S., & Hidayat, R. 2014. Peningkatan Kinerja UKM dengan Mengimplementasikan Informasi Akun- tansi Manajemen yang Didukung oleh Informasi antar Unit. Fokus Ekonomi 9(1): 100-111.
Anthony, R. N. 2003. Management Accounting: A Personal History. Journal of Management Accounting Research 15(1): 249-253.
Birnberg, J. G. 2011. Memorial Robert N.Anthony: A Pioneering Thinker in Management Accounting. Accounting Horizons 25(3): 593-602.
Broccardo, L. 2014. Management Accounting System in Italian SMEs: Some Evidence and Implications. Advances in Management & Applied Economics 4(4): 1-16.
Chand, M., & Ambardar, A. 2013. Management Accounting Practices in Hospitality and Service Enterprises: A Comparative Research. Journal of Commerce & Accounting Research 2(3): 1-9.
Chiarini, A. 2012. Lean Production: mistakes and limitations of accounting systems inside the SME sector. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 23(5): 681-700.
Christian, A. B., & Rita, M. R. 2016. Peran Penggunaan Informasi Akuntansi dalam Pengambilan Keputusan untuk Menunjang Keberhasilan Usaha. EBBank 7(2): 77-92.
Cuzdriorean, D. D. 2017. The Use of Management Accounting Practices by Romanian Small and MediumSized Enterprises: A Filed Study. Accounting and Management Information Systems 16(2): 291-312.
Horngren, C. T. 1962. Choosing Accounting Practices for Reporting to Management. National Association of Accountants. NAA Bulletin (pre-1986) 44 (1):44.
Horngren, C. T., Datar, S. M., & Rajan, M. V. 2015. Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis. Pearson.
Keong, C. K. 1997. Management and accounting management practice: An essential perspective. Management Services: 41.
Laureano, R. M., Machado, M. J., & Laureano, L. M. 2016. Maturity in Management Accounting: Exploratory Study in Portuguese SME. Society and Economy 38(2): 139-156.
McChlery, S., Godfrey, P. A., & Meechan, L. 2005. Barriers and catalysts to sound financial management systems in small sized enterprises. The Journal of Applied Accounting Research 7(3): 1-26.
Mourougane, A. 2012. Promoting SME Development in Indonesia. OECD Economics Department Working Papers.
Pearlstein, S. 1988, April. Accounting Critic Robert Kaplan. Inc 10(4): 54.
Purwati, A. S., Suparlinah, I., & Putri, N. K. 2014. The Use of Accounting Information in the Business Decision Making Process on Small and Medium Enterprises in Banyumas Region, Indonesia. Economy Transdiscipli- narity Cognition 17(2),63-75.
Shields, J., & Shelleman, J. M. 2016. Management Accounting Systems in Micro-SMEs. The Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship 21(1): 19-32.
Surenggono, & Djamilah, S. 2016. Variabel Mediasi Pen- garuh Persepsi dan Pengetahuan Pelaku Usaha Kecil dan Menengah (UKM) terhadap Kinerja UKM. Dina- mika Global: Rebranding Keunggulan Kompetituf Ber- basis Kearifan Lokal: 787-799.
Wijewardena, H., Zoysa, A., Fonseka, T., & Perera, B. 2004. The Impact of Planing and COntrol Sophistication on Performance of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: Evidence from Sri Lanka. Journal of Small Business Management 42(2),209-216.
Williams, K. 1986. Charles T. Horngren: Management Accounting’s Renaissance Man. Management Accounting: 22.
Wirjono, E. R., & Raharjono, D. B. 2012. Survei Pemaha- man dan Pemanfaatan Informasi Akuntansi dalam Usaha Kecil Menengah di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. AUDI Jurnal Akuntansi dan Bisnis: 205-216.
More on the topic The application of management accounting in micro and small enterprises:
- Abdullah A.G., Widiaty I., Abdullah G.U. (eds.). Global Competitiveness: Business Transformation in the Digital Era. Routledge,2019. — 325 p., 2019
- Table of contents
- Oral Accounting
- Small peoples.
- The Application of Modern Theories of the Use and Function of Memory
- 2. Models that predict small policy effects on growth
- Growth accounting, the linearity critique, and other contributions
- Local Production of Small Incense Altars
- Poor Application of Statutory Control Policies
- 24 Small intestinal diarrhoea