<<
>>

Summary

The Zambezi Plateau region in Southern Africa experienced the formation and fall of archaeologically visible polities with different levels of sociopolitical complex­ity during many centuries, before the arrival of Europeans and the beginning of the region’s written history.

Much archaeological work has been done to recover this past (i.e., the slow process record, in terms of the Canonical Theory), but one of the most important persistent questions has been a theoretically effective explanation for the rise, fall, and abandonment of large polities centered around monumental structures with massive stone walls called zimbabwes. Several of these survive to the present day, the largest of which is called Great Zimbabwe, located near present- day Masvingo, Zimbabwe. The Great Zimbabwe period, lasting only 200 years, was preceded by Mapungubwe and succeeded by zimbabwes built to the north and south­west of the Great Zimbabwe site. Given the success of these polities, what caused them to decline in such a way that the sites are considered to have experienced not only decline but abandonment?

The agent-based model presented here, called ZambeziLand 1.0, provides support for a theoretically grounded explanation of settlement and abandonment based on the Canonical Theory. In this theory, a succession of opportunities to engage in collec­tive action by individuals and groups in society (iterative fast processes with canon­ical variations) strengthens or weakens the complexity of their respective polity (the singular slow process of each society). Iterations of this so-called “fast process” over time generate broader institutional changes whereby the effects of collective action within each fast process accumulate through a “slow process” resulting in a polity with variable and seemingly idiosyncratic but explainable levels of complexity over time.

These processes exhibit the same cross-cultural universal pattern. This is a novel contribution that advances our understanding of polity cycling in the Zambezi Plateau, arguably extending to other regional applications elsewhere (e.g., as orig­inally observed by Steward and developed more recently by Marcus Marcus 1998, 2012, among others).

The ZambeziLand model provides an explanation of how a society can change its complexity over time through decisions made by group members in fast processes. In the model, groups rose, declined, and disbanded as leadership and feelings of loyalty and group attachment rose and fell. Such feelings were affected by successes and failures in collective action, and the probability of success was dependent in part on the strength of group leaders. Comparable dynamics occur today in all societies.

The main finding presented here is that group dynamics, centered on collective feelings of loyalty to a group, can generate the macro-level behavior observed in the archaeological record of Southern Africa. This computational finding has implica­tions for further investigation into the role of ideologies and imagery, especially on views of group leadership and loyalty among the people that built the monumental zimbabwes of Southern Africa.

Acknowledgments An earlier version of this paper was prepared by the first author, who also wrote the original model code, for the Seminar on Origins of Social Complexity, Department of Computational Social Science, George Mason University, Fall 2012, taught by the second author. This version was extensively revised by both authors for presentation at the Conference on Simulat­ing the Past to Understand Human History, Barcelona, Spain, September 3-4, 2014, organized and chaired by Juan Antonio Barcelo, Autonomous University of Barcelona. All errors are the responsi­bility of the authors, who declare no conflicts of interest. Thanks to Jeff Bassett for introducing the authors to ShareLaTeX, the online system used to write and compile this paper while maintaining a single version, and to Henry Oswald and James Allen of the ShareLaTeX team in the UK for enabling this collaborative result (and others to follow).

<< | >>
Source: Barcelo Juan A., Del Castillo Florencia (eds.). Simulating Prehistoric and Ancient Worlds. Springer,2016. — 410 p.. 2016

More on the topic Summary:

  1. Summary
  2. Summary
  3. Summary
  4. Summary
  5. Summary
  6. Summary
  7. Summary
  8. SUMMARY
  9. SUMMARY
  10. SUMMARY
  11. SUMMARY
  12. SUMMARY
  13. SUMMARY
  14. SUMMARY
  15. Summary