The functional aspect of the social organism

Now we can see how the social life is implemented. The essence of the social movements of the body or the social life is the global objective metabolic processes and products.

Analysis showed that in the social world two areas of share objec­tive products and its four types should be selected, i.e.

In practice it is well known, for example, not only about the ex­istence of these two flows of exchange, but that the structure of the individual prevails the spiritual component and the material compo­nent is something like an original character. However, a well-known fact is understood that on the side of society, however, prevails the material component, while its spiritual opposite of unstable opera­tion is partially outside. Hence, the underestimation in practice of the culture and everything that relates to the provision of spiritual­ity in society. Last materializes in everyday life in the principles of behavior of the managers through the cultivation of the final princi­ple of funding the spiritual sphere.

Historical analysis has shown, that the human life that does not cover all the micro-level richness of the universum self-movement was actually concentration of their attention on specific points of his performance, then we have the absolutisation of the noumenal fac­tion or the factions of phenomenal process performance. As V. Shma­kov wrote: “If society artificially centers only on the noumenal, there is a church, if is only phenomenal - there is economic power.

In fact we have the notion of social interaction - communication and work, including the man in the horizontal circulation of the ob­jective universum. In its totality, they both form the fact that we call the production of material and spiritual purpose. All together they form a specific process, which we call social metabolism, because there the exchange of the objective products is going.

Exchange, which runs in the vertical plane is carried out in the information form, and is simply not fully understood and underesti­mated. Information metabolism just allows to estimate place and role of the social organism in the Universe self-development. We have to realize the function of information, intelligence converted the idea of human form, packaged in a semantic unit - the quantum of knowl­edge and sent to the outside world. Depending on how we absorb in­formation metabolism will increase understanding of cosmic origin and destination of the planetary life.

When comparing these two metabolic fluxes we can see that lead plays this same exchange that flows in the vertical plane. Especially ac­tual, as it turns out, may be learning through this attitude the works of

N. Berdyaev, who believed in derived planetary world. [17, 150-152].

Stable operation of the social body, as it has been already repeat­edly shown, is accompanied by an increase of functional expression. The expression is a functional quality of the generic product, and if so, it must be fundamentally different in quality than the individual and society.

Based on the laws of functioning of reasonable living matter, it might be justified by the working hypothesis that during the joint operation of the individual and society appears the qualitatively new over intelligent substance that can be described as the purest social reality.

In other words, just as in the functioning of the human body per­son’s identity had appeared, and in the self-deployment of society the evident effect of collective identity had appeared, so now the turn of the over collective formations is to come to the forefront. Life of the last flows in the form of weak interaction, which is originated by pul­sation of “bloodless” collective social structures.

In other words, we still had to deal with social formations that are quite possible to describe the categories of “I” and “You”. But we know that more must be self-realization “We”. Then “we” is the level of the over collective social formations that produce cleanest social content.

This level of the Russian philosophy, and particularly theologi­cal thought, develops through the category of “collegiality” (sobornost) Based on the concepts that we developed, life of over col­lective social entities is a form of existence of social reality in mega level. Here’s how this moment is described by S. Frank, who matches the concept of the unity not with any particular society, the type of education, culture, social system or church life, but with any soci­ety, regardless of its quality certainty. In particular, he writes the following: “the phenomenological and thus ontologically man gets his self-consciousness, exists as “me” just because an antithesis to another “I” - “You” and is a dependent member of the dual unity. Therefore, the relationship between I “and” You “is not derived from the independent existence of individual” I “, but creates it for the first time. In other words,” I “exists only within the” We “as eternal and unstruggled unity. “We-Unity”is equally primary, as the unity of “I”. The human is conceivable only as a member of the spiritual body of the society” [191, 321].

Unity is not a collective reality, which stands over a man, accord­ing to N. Berdyaev, it is a “higher spiritual existence of people, is joining the dialogue between alive and dead” [15, 229].

Human consciousness, N. Trubetzkoy said, is not reduced to the personal consciousness of the individual. Human consciousness is the collective function of the human race, living and concrete social pro­cess. Internal metaphysical unity is thought and word and that is why “organic unity of human consciousness involves not only the unity of the family but lives and personal communication between people - and not just family and individual, but also special over personal be­ginning, in which the ancestry tolerates the individual” [182, 498].

The availability of this over collective level in the objective social world is intuitively felt by researchers, because it is by virtue of their social attribute properties, does the pressure on us. Developing the idea of united consciousness, N. Trubetskoy comes to his famous for­mula: “Consciousness cannot be nor impersonal, neither self-person­al, because it is more personal than being united” [182, 498].

All the above means that at this level subjective social, having absorbed a content of a potential social world that is in the structure of the human person and the content of society, which is objected at the macro level, creates an original product seducing it to mega lev­el. Here we are dealing with refined social content, which plays in

our lives and integrating role uniting people of different social in­tegrities. This is logical structure of origin. All the above mentioned meaning an abstract level, is a qualitatively different social content, shows that we are dealing, to assess if what happens in the macro category, with the overconcionsness of the social organism.

If you apply to the category of the subjective, here we are dealing with an abstract person. It converges and leads relatively indepen­dent lives of a lot of “I”. Person is a public image of the “I” that forms the neutral “it”, it is a neutral Person.

This means that in the theoretical analysis of the content of the social world we came to understanding the necessity and objective existence of a special class of subjects without any protein-nucleic acid substrates.

It is not superfluous question. Regarding the last remark, for example, researchers thought scattered. In philosophical and socio­

Fig. 3.2. The genetical model of the social organism

logical literature, for example, the widespread view that denies the existence of any objection to the deployment as supermarkets. The main argument here is that “the man, the society is the supreme (high­est) steps of the matter” (Orlov), capable of infinite development, without exceeding the limits “(A. Swallow). At the same time, Ursu­la A., for example, writes that “at some stage of development the new form based on social, which can be broadly described as” over the pub­lic “or” post social should appear” [183, 205].

The presence in the social world class of abstract social entities should explain the many paradoxes of social consciousness. Howev­er, the measure of how society is animated, the individuals “trans­form” into some semblance of an inorganic body, machine or its parts, “wheel” or “Cog”, the more abstract takes concrete human qualities, the more people like themselves to lose them, “erase” their human appearance, becoming only some social “thing”.

Socium, abstraction, seemingly abstract concepts are beginning to live their unique, independent life. With this in social psychology of society and the individual maximum are separated from one an­other: Society is “a great man, a man is at best - a small car. The same should perceive and explain the principle of the “invisible hand”. The question of formation in society of the impersonal power is devel­oped by the French institutionalizes such Byurdo and Wedel, later it was thoroughly researched by D. Levin.

So, if the principle of Ready would be followed, we came close to understanding the origin of the existence of space forms of life on Earth. Third nature is not fantasy, but twice objectived social reality of the material. This is not a social nature. Direct analogue here is the second nature in relation to the first nature. And they are the universum, but one that is at different phases of self-movement.

3.5.