<<
>>

VD and DV Projections

Choosing between a DV and VD projection is more a function of hospital protocol or personal preference than clinical need. To obtain the VD view, the animal is placed in dorsal recumbency.

The primary beam enters the patient in a VD orientation at the

Figure 4-2

A, Patient positioning to obtain an oblique view of the middle ear. The resultant radiograph is named the left 20-degree ventral-right dorsal oblique view, which describes the entrance and exit points of the primary beam. The asterisk indicates the point where the primary x-ray beam enters the patient. B, Patient positioning to obtain a right 20-degree ventral-left dorsal oblique radiograph. The arrow indicates the trajectory of the primary beam.

Continued

Figure 4-2—cont'd

C, Left 20-degree ventral-right dorsal oblique radiograph of the middle ear. The right bulla is displaced ventrally (white arrowheads). Only a faint outline of the wall of the left bulla can be seen (black arrowheads) with the left external acoustic meatus located dorsally (black arrows). There is superimposition of the right stylohyoid bone over the right tympanic bulla. The angu­lar process of the right hemimandible (white arrow) is visible ventral to the right temporo­mandibular joint (curved arrow).

midline halfway between the external acoustic meatuses (Figure 4-3, A). The animal is placed in sternal recumbency to obtain a DV view. The primary beam is directed vertically centered at a point where an imaginary line connecting the bullae inter­sects with the midsagittal plane. The body of the mandible should be parallel to the cassette, to avoid distortion. The tongue should be pulled forward and maintained on the midline.

These views are used to assess the ear canals and to compare symmetry of the bullae and the petrosal portion of the temporal bones. The tympanic bullae cannot be evaluated fully in this view because they are superimposed over the petrosal portions of the temporal bones (Figure 4-3, B). There is no specific bone pattern associated with the petrous temporal bones, however; they should exhibit a symmetrical shape, size, and opacity on these projections. Reducing the milliamp seconds (mAs) by half to highlight the soft tissues allows visualization of the

Figure 4-3

A, Patient positioning to obtain a VD view of the middle ear. The asterisk indicates the entrance point of the primary x-ray beam. Choosing between a VD and a DV view is more a function of hospital protocol or personal preference than clinical need. B, VD radiograph of the middle ear. The most caudal walls of the tympanic bullae (black arrowheads) are noted caudal to the more radiopaque petrosal portions of the temporal bones (asterisks). Rostral to the mastoid process (white arrowheads) lies the external acoustic meatus. The paracondylar process (white arrows) projects caudally. C, DV radiograph of the middle ear. The soft tissue exposure technique allows visualization of the external ear canals (arrows). The walls of the tympanic bullae (arrow­heads) surround the petrosal portions of the temporal bones (asterisks).

horizontal portion of the external acoustic canals (Figure 4-3, C), which are noted as well-defined lucent structures. The canals tend to be wider laterally as the auricular cartilage expands to form the pinna. The average diameter of the proximal end of the annular cartilage is 4.1 ± 0.7 mm in dogs in which the tympanic membrane is visible otoscopically.1

<< | >>
Source: Gotthelf Louis N.. Small Animal Ear Diseases: An Illustrated Guide. 2nd ed. — Saunders,2004. — 384 p.. 2004
More medical literature on Medic.Studio

More on the topic VD and DV Projections:

  1. Multiyear projections
  2. HOW ACCURATE ARE PROJECTIONS IN PRACTICE?
  3. Future Projections of Energy Demand
  4. PROJECTING FINANCIAL FLEXIBILITY
  5. The information age
  6. DIGESTIVE PROBLEMS
  7. Conventional Radiography
  8. Boon Andrew. The Ethics and Conduct of Lawyers in England and Wales. Hart Publishing,1999. — 808 p., 1999
  9. Griffiths-Baker Janine. Serving Two Masters: Conflicts of Interest in the Modern Law Firm. Hart Publishing,2002. — 227 p., 2002
  10. Grisso T.. Evaluating Competencies: Forensic Assessments and Instruments. 2nd edition. — Springer,2002. — 564 p., 2002
  11. Luban David. Legal Ethics and Human Dignity. Cambridge University Press,2007. — 350 p., 2007
  12. Ayupova Z.K.. Theory of state and law: textbook. - Almaty: Kazakh Univer­sity,2015. - 192 pages., 2015
  13. Allen Danielle, Benkler Yochai et al. (eds.). A Political Economy of Justice. The University of Chicago Press,2022. — 416 p., 2022
  14. Barnes Rudolph C.. Military Legitimacy: Might and Right in the New Millennium.Frank Cass,1996. — 198 p., 1996
  15. Bedner Adriaan (ed.).. Real Legal Certainty and its Relevance: Essays in Honor of Jan Michiel Otto. Leiden University Press,2018. — 261 p., 2018
  16. Fridson M., Alvarez F.. Financial Statement Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,2002. — 413 p, 2002
  17. Banking, Finance, and Accounting: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications. IGI Global,2014. — 1593 p., 2014