<<
>>

THE ROLE OF INDIVIDUALS

On many occasions exceptional non-Europeans determined the outcome of early cross-cultural encounters. Employing an admittedly imprecise classification scheme whose categories are not mutually exclusive,47 one may identify four types:

1.

Preservers: Rulers who used diplomatic and governing skills to try to preserve a polity’s independence. In some cases the effort was successful. In the many cases in which it was not, the individual’s actions affected how and when the takeover oc­curred. In phases 1 and 2 the preservers included Hideyoshi and leyasu (Japan), Pow­hatan (Virginia), Gia Long (Vietnam), and Kamehameha I and II (Hawaii). In phase 3, Ranjit Singh (Punjab, India), Moshoeshoe (Sotho; Basutoland), Lewanika (Lozi; Northern Rhodesia), Mongkut, Chulalongkorn and Prince Devawongse (Thailand), Ismail (Egypt), Menelik II (Abyssinia), Mutesa (Buganda; Uganda), Radama I, Ra- navalona I, and Premier Rainilaiarivony (Imerina; Madagascar), Kgama (Ngwato branch of Batswana; Bechuanaland).

2. Resisters: Rulers whose armies fought Europeans and leaders in early violent re­sistance movements against settlers or colonial administrators. In phases i and 2, Cuitlahuac (Mexica Aztec; New Spain), Manco Inca (Inca; Peru), Metacom (Wam- panoag; Massachusetts Bay Colony), Pop£ (Pueblo Indians; New Spain), Nzinga Mbande (Angola), Coxinga (Taiwan), and Tipu Sultan (Mysore). In phase 3, Bagyi- daw (Burma), Abd al-Qadir (Algeria), Dingane (Zulu; South Africa), Lakshmi Bai and Rani of Jhansi (India), Te Ua Haumene and Te Kooti (Maori; New Zealand), Samory (sudanic West Africa), Rabeh (sudanic West-Central Africa), Muhammad Ahmad and Ibn Abdallah, proclaimed the Mahdi (Sudan), Ahmad Urabi (Egypt), Mkwawa (Hehe; German East Africa), Behanzin (Dahomey), Bai Bureh (Temne; Sierra Leone), Sayyid Muhammad Abdille Hassan (British Somaliland), and Samuel Maherero (Herero; German Southwest Africa).

3.

Facilitators: Individuals who assisted European explorers, soldiers, traders, mission agencies, or settlers (for example, as guides, translators, or missionaries). In phases 1 and 2 Ahmad ibn Madjid (Vasco da Gama; Indian Ocean), Malinche (Dona Marina) (Hernan Cortes), and Squanto (Wampanoag; Pilgrims). In phase 3, Samuel Adjai Crowther (missionary pioneer, Nigeria), James Chuma (guide for David Living­stone), and Munisi (Matabeleland guide; Southern Rhodesia).

4. Collaborators: Politically prominent individuals who formed alliances with Euro­peans to increase their power or to ward off challenges from others. In phases 1 and 2, Sultan ofMalindi (Vasco da Gama; East Africa), Mir Jafar (Robert Clive; Bengal), and Sultan of Kedah (Penang). In phase 3, Tawfiq (Egypt) and Akitoye (Lagos, Nigeria).

CONCLUSION

This chapter illustrates the multiple ways in which non-Europeans shaped their own history. Clearly, a theory of European imperialism that ignores the rest of the world is inadequate. Likewise, an account that concentrates only on resistance fails to capture the indigenous “pull” factor, which in turn affected the timing, location, and overall results of the European “push.” Indigenous actors are not in danger of being ignored when the topic is the end of empire. But the danger is present when one is trying to explain the outset of empire. Hence the need for this chapter as a supple­ment to the three Eurocentric chapters preceding it.

<< | >>
Source: Abernethy David B.. The Dynamics of Global Dominance: European Overseas Empires, 1415-1980. Yale University Press,2002. — 524 p.. 2002

More on the topic THE ROLE OF INDIVIDUALS:

  1. THE ROLE OF INDIVIDUALS
  2. Populations evolve, individuals do not
  3. What are individuals?
  4. 7 INDIVIDUALS
  5. Narrative Construction of Individuals and Groups
  6. A population is a group of individuals of the same species that live in the same area at the same time and interact with one another.
  7. Individuals within species differ in their life histories
  8. Populations and Individuals
  9. MODULATION OF APOPTOSIS IN THE THYMUSES OF INFECTED INDIVIDUALS
  10. Route of Infection and Transmission Between Individuals
  11. Grounding Collective Obligations in Demands on Individuals
  12. Individuals respond to environmental variation through acclimatization
  13. Individuals often alter their foraging decisions when predators are present
  14. Blaming Collectives as a Way of Evoking Collectively Tainted Guilt in Individuals
  15. We accept as a standard truth that we are separate from all other peo­ple: we are alone, we are individuals, we are each one of a kind.
  16. Marriage was one of the fundamental institutions of Roman society, as it joined not only two individuals but two families.
  17. Violence converges from the bottom-up, top-down, and side-ways. Individuals most apt to find themselves in this convergence will do so at home and/or as children.