Assessing the Ming Empire
Until the mid-twentieth century, most histories attributed the Ming dynasty's fall to political and moral failure. By the late sixteenth century, went this story, incompetent and/or disaffected emperors were unable or unwilling to fulfill their duties as rulers, a fatal flaw in a system that depended so heavily on a single man, the Son of Heaven.
Decisions were left unmade, key government posts remained unfilled, factional conflict left unchecked, taxes misspent, and corruption and misery ignored. As a result, rebellion exploded, and the dynasty fell.In more recent decades, several other explanations have gained currency. Among the first scholars with a strong grasp of Ming primary materials to write about the Ming's fiscal administration in English, Ray Huang developed an interpretation that was both elegantly simple and historically informed. At the broadest level, he argued that the Ming dynasty's fiscal and administrative systems were fundamentally flawed, incapable of coping with demographic change, economic transformation, or new geopolitical demands. Basic tax rates were too low, imperial revenue too reliant on agriculture, accounting practices too primitive, and dynastic institutions too hidebound. Although Huang acknowledged change and reform, he consistently highlighted the Ming state's ideological and institutional limitations. In his voluminous writings, Huang offered both detailed discussion that drew on a close reading of a wide range of materials and easily digestible take-away points. His work remains broadly influential today, most especially for scholars who are not Ming specialists but who are interested in the period or the dynasty for comparative purposes. They might well ask, however, if the dynasty was so flawed in so many ways from so early, how did it manage to oversee the world's most populous country for more than two and a half centuries?[1487]
In addition to older explanations that privileged moral-political failure and Huang's institutional stasis model, some scholars have drawn attention to the importance of silver flows and their interruption to the Ming economy and polity.
They argue that disruption of the flow of New World silver to China exacerbated late Ming economic and monetary problems by reducing silver's circulation.[1488] The correlation of epidemic disease and climatically induced economic, social, and political dislocations on the Ming's collapse has also been examined.[1489] Yet others stress flawed military strategy in the suppression of domestic rebellion and the increasingly dangerous threat of the emergent Manchus in the northeast.[1490] Thus, rather than insist on a mono-causal explanation of a complex historical event (or series of events), we could do worse than to agree with one leading specialist, who concludes that the combination of fiscal insolvency, rebellion, Manchu military might, and the weather conspired to end the Ming dynasty.[1491]This chapter has focused on the Ming dynasty largely in the context of continental Asia since that was the focus of its interests and challenges, but maritime dimensions of the story cannot be ignored. Several generations ago it was common to write about the arrival of the Portuguese and Spanish in East Asia during the sixteenth century as the beginning of the end for not only the Ming dynasty but also Chinese imperial power as a whole; it was one episode in a triumphalist narrative of the dynamic West's rise and the moribund East's decline. In more recent decades, scholars have in contrast stressed that such encounters were largely conducted on Chinese (and later Manchu) terms. [1492] Rather than remaking East Asia, the Portuguese insinuated themselves into vigorous Asian maritime trade networks, negotiating long-term use of a port (Macao), exploiting commercial opportunities created by tensions among the major regional actors (principally the Ming throne, Chinese coastal interests, and Japanese traders), and seeking accommodation with the Ming state and its local representatives through gifts, offers of military assistance (such as forging cannons), and nominal acceptance of Ming protocol.[1493] Viewed from Western European history's perspective, one might explain the Portuguese's limited impact as a result of its character as a “trade empire.” However, when considered in a global context, perhaps the more compelling explanation was the Ming Empire's resilience.
When the dynasty fell in 1644, it was not at the hands of a European power but, as Pamela Crossley describes in Chapter 29 of this volume, the Qing, a multiethnic polity from Manchuria that skillfully exploited the Ming government's fiscal straits, climate- induced difficulties, and political turmoil.[1494]The Ming Empire was not closed, isolated, or mired in the past. It conducted relations with polities that varied in scale, organization, and objectives. It incorporated large non-Chinese populations through sophisticated military and administrative institutions sensitive to the shifting demands of place and time. Far from all-powerful, the Ming state nonetheless oversaw the world's largest populace; successfully recruited local elites through a civil service examination; extracted taxes, labor, and materials through an empire-wide bureaucracy; responded to natural and man-made crises; and adapted to long-term socioeconomic changes. Despite its lofty rhetoric of compassion for the people, moral rectitude, and adherence to the enduring ways of Heaven and the sages of antiquity, the Ming state and its local representatives did not shrink from the use of brutal military force and intimidation, nor were they were above deception and rank hypocrisy in dealings with dynastic subjects and neighbors who, while part of a larger imperial order, maintained their own perspectives and pursued their own interests. If in its final decades, the Ming state failed to meet new challenges nimbly enough to stave off the Qing dynasty, much of its institutional infrastructure would persist under the Manchus despite their markedly different vision of empire.
Bibliography
Allsen, T. 1997. Commodity and Exchange in the Mongol Empire. Cambridge.
Allsen, T. 2001. Culture and Conquest in Mongol Eurasia. Cambridge.
Allsen, T. 2006. “Technologies ofGovernance in the Mongolian Empire: A Geographic Overview.” In D. Sneath, ed., Imperial Statecraft: Political Forms and Techniques of Governance in Inner Asia, Sixth-Twentieth Centuries, 117-140.
Bellingham, WA.Andrade, T. 2016. The Gunpowder Age: China, Military Innovation, and the Rise of the West in World History. Princeton, NJ.
Atwell, W 1988. “The T'ai-ch'ang, T'ien-ch'i, and Ch'ung-chen Reigns, 1620-1644.” In F. Mote and D. Twitchett, eds., Cambridge History of China, Vol. 7: The Ming Dynasty, 1368-1644, Part 1, 585-640. Cambridge.
Atwell, W 1990. “A Seventeenth-Century ‘General Crisis' in East Asia.” Modern Asian Studies 24, no. 4: 661-682.
Atwell, W 1998. “Ming China and the Emerging World Economy, c. 1471-1650.” In F. Mote and D. Twitchett, eds., Cambridge History of China, Vol. 8: The Ming Dynasty, 1368-1644, Part 2, 376-416. Cambridge.
Atwell, W 2001. “Volcanism and Short-Term Climatic Change in East Asian and World History, c. 1200-1699.” Journal of World History 12:29-98.
Atwell, W 2005. “Another Look at Silver Imports into China, ca. 1635-1644.” Journal of World History 16, no. 4: 467-489.
Atwood, C. 2000. “‘Worshipping Grace': The Language of Loyalty in Qing Mongolia.” Late Imperial China 21, no. 2: 86-139.
Atwood, C. 2004. Encyclopedia of Mongolia and the Mongol Empire. New York.
Atwood, C. 2006. “Ulus Emirs, Keshig Elders, Signatures, and Marriage Partners: The Evolution of a Classic Mongol Institution.” In D. Sneath, ed., Imperial Statecraft: Political Forms and Techniques of Governance in Inner Asia, Sixth-Twentieth Centuries, 141-173. Bellingham, WA.
Bang, P. F., and C. A. Bayly. 2011. “Tributary Empires: Towards a Global and Comparative History.” In P. F. Bang and C. A. Bayly, eds., Tributary Empires in Global History, 1-17. Houndmills, Basingstoke, and Hampshire, UK.
Barfield, T 1989. The Perilous Frontier: Nomadic Empires and China, 221BC to AD 1757. Cambridge and London.
Barfield, T 2001. “The Shadow Empires: Imperial State Formation along the Chinese-Nomad Frontier.” In S. Alcock, T. D'altroy, et al., eds., Empires: Perspectives from Archeology and History, 10-41. Cambridge.
Berger, P. 2001 “Miracles in Nanjing: An Imperial Record of the Fifth Karmapa's Visit to the Chinese Capital.” In M.
Weidner, ed., Cultural Intersections in Later Chinese Buddhism, 145169. Honolulu.Biran, M. 2004. “The Mongol Transformation: From the Steppe to Eurasian Empire.” Medieval Encounters 10, no. 1-3: 339-361.
Brook, T 1998. “Communications and Commerce.” In F. Mote and D. Twitchett, eds., Cambridge History of China, Vol. 8: The Ming Dynasty, 1368-1644, Part 2, 579-707. Cambridge.
Brook, T 1998b. The Confusions of Pleasure: Commerce and Culture in Ming China. Berkeley, CA.
Brook, T 2007. “What Happens When Wang Yangming Crosses the Border?” In D. Lary, ed., The Chinese State at the Borders, 74-90. Vancouver and Toronto.
Brook, T 2010. The Troubled Empire: China in the Yuan and Ming Dynasties. Cambridge.
Burbank, J., and F. Cooper. 2010. Empires in World History: Power and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ.
Cha, H. 2011. “Was Joseon a Model or an Exception? Reconsidering the Tributary Relations during Ming China.” Korea Journal 51, no. 4: 33-58.
Chan, A. 1976. The Usurpation of the Prince of Yen, 1398-1402. San Francisco, CA.
Chan, H. 1988. “The Chien-wen, Yung-lo, Hung-hsi, and Hsuan-te Reigns.” In F. Mote and D. Twitchett, eds., Cambridge History of China, Vol. 7: The Ming Dynasty, 1368-1644, Part 1, 182304. Cambridge.
Chang, C. 2007. The Rise of the Chinese Empire. Ann Arbor, MI.
Chase, K. 2003. Firearms: A Global History. Cambridge.
Chen Gaohua. 2000. “Autocracy of the Early Ming Depicted in the Great Warnings (Da gao).” Chinese Studies in History 33, no. 3: 28-49.
Chu Hung-lam (Zhu Honglin), ed. 2010. Ming Taizu de zhiguo linian jiqishijian. Hong Kong.
Clark, D. 1998. “Sino-Korean Tributary Relations under the Ming.” In F. Mote and D. Twitchett, eds., Cambridge History of China, Vol. 8: The Ming Dynasty, 1368-1644, Part 2, 272-300. Cambridge.
Clunas, C. 1991. Superfluous Things. Urbana and Chicago, IL.
Clunas, C. 2004. Elegant Debts: The Social Art of Wen Zhengming. London.
Cosmo, N. di, et al., eds. 2009. The Cambridge History of Inner Asia: The Chinggisid Age.
Cambridge.Dardess, J. 1970. “Transformation of Messianic Revolt and the Founding of the Ming Dynasty.” Journal of Asian Studies 29, no. 3: 539-558.
Dardess, J. 1978. “Ming T'ai-tsu on the Yuan: An Autocrat's Assessment of the Mongol Dynasty.” Bulletin of Song and Yuan Studies 14: 6-11.
Dardess, J. 1983. Confucianism and Autocracy: Professional Elites in the Founding of the Ming Dynasty. Berkeley, CA.
Dardess, J. 2002. Blood and History: The Donglin Faction and its Repression, 1620-1627. Honolulu. Darwin, J. 2007. After Tamerlane: The Global History of Empire since 1405. London.
Debreczeny, K. 2003. “Sino-Tibetan Synthesis in Ming Dynasty Temples at the Core and Periphery.” The Tibet Journal 28, no. 1-2:49-108.
Debreczeny, K. 2016. “The Early Ming Imperial Atelier on the Tibetan Frontier.” In C. Clunas, J. Harrison-Hall, and Luk Y., eds., Ming China: Courts and Contacts 1400-1450, 152-162. London.
Dennerline, J. 1979. “Hsü Tu and the Lesson of Nanking: Political Integration and the Local Defense in Chiang-nan, 1634-1645.” In J. Spence and J. Wills, eds., From Ming to Ch’ing: Conquest, Region, and Continuity in Seventeenth Century China, 89-132. New Haven, CT, and London.
Des Forges, R. 2003. Cultural Centrality and Political Change in Chinese History. Stanford, CA.
Dreyer, E. 1988. “Military Origins of Ming China.” In F. Mote and D. Twitchett, eds., Cambridge History of China, Vol. 7: The Ming Dynasty, 1368-1644, Part 1, 58-106. Cambridge.
Dreyer, E. 2007. Zheng He: China and the Oceans in the Early Ming Dynasty, 1405-1433. New York.
Duindam, J., T Artan, and M. Kunt. 2011. Royal Courts in Dynastic States and Empires: A Global Perspective. Leiden and Boston.
Duindam, J. 2015. Dynasties: A Global History of Power, 1300-1800. Cambridge.
Duncan, J. 2000. The Origins of the Choson Dynasty. Seattle, WA.
Dunstan, H. 1979. “The Late Ming Epidemics: A Preliminary Survey.” Ch’ing-shih wen-t’i 3, no. 3:1-59.
Ejima, H. 1999. “Minsho ni okeru Jochoku no Ryoto iju ni tsuite—Anraku Jizai nishu no ichi kosatsu—.” In H. Ejima, ed., Mindai Shinsho no Jochokushi kenkyü, 3-7. Fukuoka.
Elverskog, J. 2003. The Jewel Translucent Sutra: Altan Khan and the Mongols in the Sixteenth Century. Leiden.
Elverskog, J. 2008. “The Story ofZhu and the Mongols ofthe Seventeenth Century.” In S. Schneewind, ed., Long Live the Emperor! Uses of the Ming Founder across Six Centuries of East Asian History, 211-243. Minneapolis, MN.
Elverskog, J. 2017. “Sagang Sechen on the Tumu Incident.” In Morris Rossabi, ed., How Mongolia Matters: War, Law, and Society, 6-18. Leiden and Boston.
Farmer, E. 1995. Hongwu and Early Ming Legislation: The Reordering of Chinese Society following the Era of Mongol Rule. Leiden, New York, and Koln.
Faure, D. 2007. Emperor and Ancestor: State and Lineage in South China. Stanford, CA.
Flynn, D., and A. Giraldez. 1995. “Born with a ‘Silver Spoon': The Origin of World Trade in 1571.” Journal of World History 6:201-221.
Franke, H. 1994. “From Tribal Chieftain to Universal Emperor and God: Legitimation ofthe Yuan Dynasty.” In H. Franke, ed., China under Mongol Rule, 296-328. Brookfield.
Geiss, J. 1987. “The Leopard Quarter during the Cheng-te Reign.” Ming Studies 24: 1-38.
Geiss, J. 1988a. “The Cheng-te Reign, 1506-1521.” In F Mote and D. Twitchett, eds., Cambridge History of China, Vol. 7: The Ming Dynasty, 1368-1644, Part 1,403-439. Cambridge.
Geiss, J. 1988b. “The Chia-ching Reign, 1522-1566.” In F. Mote and D. Twitchett, ed., Cambridge History of China, Vol. 7: The Ming Dynasty, 1368-1644, Part 1,440-510. Cambridge.
Golden, P. 2011. Central Asia in World History. Oxford.
Gommans, J. 2002. “Warhorses and Post-Nomadic Empire in Asia, c. 1000-1800.” Journal of Global History 2:1-21.
Heijdra, M. 1998. “The Socio-economic Development of Rural China during the Ming.” In F. Mote and D. Twitchett, eds., Cambridge History of China, Vol. 8: The Ming Dynasty 1368-1644, Part 2, 417-578. Cambridge.
Herman, J. 2007. Amid the Clouds and Mists: Chinas Colonization of Guizhou, 1200-1700. Cambridge.
Higgins, R. 1980. “Pirates in Gowns and Caps: Gentry Law-Breaking in the Mid-Ming.” Ming Studies 10: 30-37.
Horner, C. 2009. Rising China and Its Postmodern Fate: Memories of Empire in a New Global Context. Athens, GA, and London.
Hu, Zhongda. 1984. “Ming yu Bei Yuan—Menggu guanxi zhi tantao.“ Neimenggu shehui kexue 5: 44-55.
Huang, R. 1970. “Military Expenditures in Sixteenth Century Ming China.” Oriens Extremus 17, no. 1-2: 39-62.
Huang, R. 1974. Taxation and Governmental Finance in Sixteenth-Century China. Cambridge.
Huang, R. 1981. 1581: A Year of No Significance. The Ming Dynasty in Decline. New Haven, CT.
Huang, R. 1988. “The Lung-ch’ing and Wan-li Reigns, 1567-1620.” In F. Mote and D. Twitchett, eds., Cambridge History of China, Vol. 7: The Ming Dynasty, 1368-1644, Part 1, 511-584. Cambridge.
Huang, R. 1998. “The Ming Fiscal Administration.” In F. Mote and D. Twitchett, eds., Cambridge History of China, Vol. 8: The Ming Dynasty, 1368-1644, Part 2, 106-171. Cambridge.
Hucker, C. 1974. “Hu Tsung-hsien’s Campaign against Hsu Hai, 1556.” In F. Kierman and J. Fairbank, eds., Chinese Ways in Warfare, 273-307. Ann Arbor, MI.
Hucker, C. 1998. “The Ming Government.” In F. Mote and D. Twitchett, eds., Cambridge History of China, Vol. 8: The Ming Dynasty, 1368-1644, Part 2, 9-105. Cambridge.
Jagchid, S., and V J. Symons. 1989. Peace, War, and Trade along the Great Wall: Nomadic-Chinese Interaction through Two Millennia. Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN.
Johnston, A. 1995. Cultural Realism: Strategic Culture and Grand Strategy in Chinese History. Princeton, NJ.
Kang, D. 2010. East Asia Before the West: Five Centuries of Trade and Tribute. New York.
Kim H. 1989. “Hwa’i yok’d ui ‘Napmun pumaso’ e taehan chehaesok—14 segi huban Mogur hanguksa haemyong ui ilcharyo.” Artai hakpo 1:15-34.
Kim H. 1993. “Isurram seryok ui Tongjin kwa Hami wangguk ui morrak.” Chindan hakpo 76: 107-142.
Kim H. 1999. “The Early History of the Moghul Nomads: The Legacy of the Chaghatai Khanate.” In R. Amitai-Preiss and D. Morgan, eds., The Mongol Empire and Its Legacy, 290-318. Leiden.
Kusunoki Y. 1988. “Mindai Sanmanei jochoku gunkan no doko.” Shiho 1:1-13.
Langlois, John. 1988. “The Hung-wu reign, 1368-1398.” In F. Mote and D. Twitchett, eds., The Cambridge History of China Volume 7 The Ming Dynasty 1368-1644 Part 1, 107-181. Cambridge.
Lam, Y. 1990. “Memoir on the Campaign against Turfan.” Journal of Asian History 24, no. 2: 105-160.
Lary, D. 2007. “Introduction.” In D. Lary, ed., The Chinese State at the Borders, 1-10. Vancouver and Toronto.
Lee, J. 2013. “Diplomatic Ritual as a Power Resource: The Politics of Asymmetry in Early Modern Chinese-Korean Relations.” Journal of East Asian Studies 3: 309-336.
Lim, I. M. 2013. “From Haijin to Kaihai: The Jiajing Court’s Search for a Modus Operandi along the South-eastern Coast (1522-1567).” Journal of the British Association for Chinese Studies 2:1-26.
Lo, J.-p. 1969. “Policy Formulation and Decision-Making on Issues Respecting Peace and War.” In Charles Hucker, ed., Chinese Government in Ming Times: Seven Studies, 41-72. New York.
Lo, J.-p. 1970. “Intervention in Annam: A Case Study of the Foreign Policy of the early Ming Government.” Tsinghua Journal of Chinese Studies 8, nos. 1-2: 154-182.
Maier, C. 2006. Among Empires: American Ascendancy and Its Predecessors. Cambridge.
McDermott, J. 1999. “Emperors, Elites, and Commoners: The Community Pact Ritual of the Late Ming.” In J. McDermott, ed., State and Court Ritual in China, 299-351. Cambridge.
Meskill, J. 1994. Gentlemanly Interests and Wealth on the Yangtze Delta. Ann Arbor, MI.
Miles, S. 2008. “Imperial Discourse, Regional Elite, and Local Landscape on the South China Frontier, 1577-1722.” Journal of Early Modern History 12: 99-136.
Miles, S. 2017. Upriver Journeys: Diaspora and Empire in Southern China, 1570-1850. Cambridge, MA.
Miller, H. 2009. State versus Gentry in late Ming Dynasty China, 1572-1644. New York.
Mote, F. 1961. “The Growth of Chinese Despotism: A Critique of Wittfogel’s Theory of Oriental Despotism as Applied to China.” Oriens Extremus 8: 1-41.
Mote, F. 1988a. “Cheng-hua and Hung-chih Reigns.” In F. Mote and D. Twitchett, eds., Cambridge History of China, Vol. 7: The Ming Dynasty, 1368-1644, Part 1, 343-402. Cambridge.
Mote, F. 1988b. “The Rise of the Ming Dynasty, 1330-1367.” In F. Mote and D. Twitchett, eds., Cambridge History of China, Vol. 7: The Ming Dynasty, 1368-1644, Part 1, 11-57. Cambridge.
Mote, F. 1999. Imperial China, 900-1800. Cambridge.
Mutschler, F.- H., and A. Mittag. 2008. Conceiving the Empire: China and Rome Compared. Oxford. Naquin, S. 2000. Peking: Temples and City Life, 1400-1900. Berkeley, CA.
Nimick, T. 2008. Local Administration in Ming China: The Changing Roles of Magistrates, Prefects, and Provincial officials. Minneapolis, MN.
Palais, J. 1995. “A Search for Korean Uniqueness.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 55, no. 2: 409-425.
Parsons, J. 1970. The Peasant Rebellions of the Late Ming Dynasty. Tucson, AZ.
Perdue, P. 1998. “Comparing Empires: Manchu Colonialism.” The International History Review 20, no. 2: 255-262.
Perdue, P. 2004. “The Qing Formation in Eurasian Time and Space: Lessons from the Galdan Campaigns.” In L. Struve, ed., The Qing Formation in World Historical Time, 57-91. Cambridge.
Perdue, P. 2005. China Marches West: The Qing Conquest of Central Eurasia. Cambridge.
Perdue, P. 2015. “The Tenacious Tributary System.” Journal of Contemporary China 1-13.
Pines, Y. 2012. The Everlasting Empire: The Political Culture of Ancient China and Its Imperial Legacy. Princeton, NJ 96: 1-13.
Pokotilov, D. 1976. History of the Eastern Mongols during the Ming from 1368 to 1634. Part I. Translation of the Russian text by Rudolf Lowenthal. Part II Addenda and Corrigenda by Wolfgang Franke. Philadelphia.
Rawski, E. 2009. “China's Relations with Korea and Japan during the Ming-Qing Transition.” Transactions of the International Conference of Eastern Studies 54:47-64.
Robinson, D. 1999a. “Korean Lobbying at the Ming Court: King Chungjong's Usurpation of 1506.” Ming Studies 41 (Spring): 37-53.
Robinson, D. 1999b. “Politics, Force, and Ethnicity in Ming China: Mongols and the Abortive Coup of 1461.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 59, no. 1 (June): 79-123.
Robinson, D. 2000. “Banditry and the Subversion of State Authority in China: The Capital Region during the Middle Ming Period (1425-1525).” Journal of Social History 33 (March): 527-563.
Robinson, D. 2001. Bandits, Eunuchs, and the Son of Heaven: Rebellion and the Economy of Violence in Mid-Ming China. Honolulu.
Robinson, D. 2004. “Images of Subject Mongols under the Ming Dynasty.” Late Imperial China 25, no. 1 (June): 59-123.
Robinson, D. 2008. “The Ming Imperial Family and the Yuan Legacy.” In D. Robinson, ed., Culture, Courtiers, and Competition, 365-421. Cambridge.
Robinson, David. 2009. Empire’s Twilight: Northeast Asia under the Mongols. Cambridge.
Robinson, D. 2012. “Mongolian Migration and Ming China.” Journal of Central Eurasian Studies 3: 109-129.
Robinson, D. 2013. Martial Spectacles of the Ming Court. Cambridge.
Robinson, D. 2014. “Military Labor Markets in China, circa 1500.” In E.-J. Zurcher, ed., Fighting for a Living: A Comparative History of Military Labour 1500-2000, 43-80. Amsterdam.
Robinson, D. 2015. “Chinese Border Garrisons in an International Context: Liaodong under the Early Ming Dynasty.” In P. Lorge and K. Roy, eds., War and Society in China and India: A Comparative Analysis, 57-73. New York.
Robinson, D. 2017. “Why Military Institutions Matter for Ming History.” The Journal of Chinese History 2: 297-327.
Robinson, D. 2020a. Ming China and Its Allies: Imperial Rule in Eurasia. Cambridge.
Robinson, D. 2020b. In the Shadow of the Mongol Empire: Ming China and Eurasia. Cambridge.
Robinson, K. 1992. “From Raiders to Traders.” Korean Studies 16: 94-115.
Robinson, K. 2000. “Centering the King of Choson: Aspects of Korean Maritime Diplomacy, 13921592.” Journal of Asian Studies 59, no. 1: 109-125.
Rossabi, M. 1970. “The Tea and Horse Trade with Inner Asia during the Ming.” Journal of Asian History 4, no. 2: 136-168.
Rossabi, M. 1982. The Jurchens in the Yüan and Ming. Ithaca, NY.
Rossabi, M. 1998. “The Ming and Inner Asia.” In F. Mote and D. Twitchett, eds., Cambridge History of China, Vol. 8: The Ming Dynasty, 1368-1644, Part 2, 221-271. Cambridge.
Scheidel, W., ed. 2009. Rome and China: Comparative Perspectives on Ancient World Empires. Oxford.
Schneewind, S. 2006a. Community Schools and the State in the Ming Dynasty. Stanford.
Schneewind, S. 2006b. A Tale of Two Melons: Emperor and Subject in Ming China. Indianapolis, IN, and Cambridge.
Schneewind, S. 2008. Long Live the Emperor! Uses of the Ming Founder across Six Centuries of East Asian History. Minneapolis, MN.
Scott, J. 2009. The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia. New Haven, CT.
Sen, T 2006. “The Formation of Chinese Maritime Networks to Southern Asia, 1200-1450.” Journal of Economic and Social History of the Orient49, no. 4: 421-453.
Serruys, H. 1955. Sino-Jürced Relations during the Yung-lo Period (1403-1424). Wiesbaden.
Serruys, H. 1959a. The Mongols in China during the Hung-wu Period. Bruxelles.
Serruys, H. 1959b. “Mongols Ennobled during the Early Ming.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 22: 209-260.
Serruys, H. 1959c. “Were the Ming against the Mongols' Settling in North China.” Oriens Extremus 6, no. 2: 131-159.
Serruys, H. 1959d. “A Mongol Settlement in North China at the End of the 16th Century.” Central Asiatic Journal 4: 237-278.
Serruys, H. 1961. “Foreigners in the Metropolitan Police during the Fifteenth Century.” Oriens Extremus 8, no. 1: 59-83.
Serruys, H. 1966. “Land Grants to the Mongols in China, 1400-1460.” Monumenta Serica 25: 394-405.
Serruys, H. 1972. “A Mongolian Version of the Legend of the Mongol Ancestry of the Yung-lo Emperor.” In J. Hangin and U. Onon, eds., Analecta Mongolica: Dedicated to the Seventieth Birthday of Professor Owen Lattimore, 19-61. Bloomington. IN.
Serruys, H. 1975. “Sino-Mongol Relations during the Ming III: Trade Relations: The Horse Fairs, 1400-1600. Bruxelles.
Sharpe, K. 2009. Selling the Tudor Monarchy: Authority and Image in Sixteenth-Century England. New Haven, CT, and London.
Shin, L. 2006a. “The Last Campaigns of Wang Yangming.” Toung-pao 92, no. 1-3: 101-128.
Shin, L. 2006b. The Making of the Chinese State: Ethnicity and Expansion on the Ming Borderlands. Cambridge.
Shin, L. 2007. “Ming China and Its Border with Annam.” In D. Lary, ed., The Chinese State at the Borders, 91-104. Vancouver and Toronto.
Sneath, D. 2007. The Headless State: Aristocratic Orders, Kinship Society, and Misrepresentation of Nomadic Inner Asia. New York.
So, K.-w. 1975. Japanese Piracy in Ming China during the Sixteenth Century. Ann Arbor, MI.
Song L., et al. 1976. Yuan shi. 1368-70, reprint. Beijing.
Steinhardt, N. 1990. Chinese Imperial City Planning. Honolulu.
Struve, L. 1993. Voices from the Ming- Qing Cataclysm: China in Tigers’ Jaws. New Haven, CT.
Swope, K. 2009. A Dragons Head and A Serpent’s Tail: Ming China and the First Great East Asian War, 1592-1598. Norman, OK.
Swope, K. 2011. “Of Bureaucrats and Bandits: Confucianism and Antirebel Strategy at the End of the Ming Dynasty.” In W Lee, ed., Warfare and Culture in World History, 61-88. New York.
Swope, K. 2014. The Military Collapse of China’s Ming Dynasty, 1618-1644. London.
Swope, K. 2017. On the Trail of the Yellow Tiger: War, Trauma, and Social Dislocation in Southwest China during the Ming- Qing Transition. Lincoln.
Szonyi, M. 2002. Practicing Kinship: Lineage and Descent in Late Imperial China. Stanford.
Szonyi, M. 2017. The Art of Being Governed: Everyday Politics in Late Imperial China. Princeton, NJ.
Tambiah, S. 1977. “The Galactic Polity: The Structure of Traditional Kingdoms in Southeast Asia.” In S. Freed, ed., Anthropology and the Climate of Opinion, 69-97. New York.
Tanaka T 1977. “Japan's Relations with Overseas Countries.” Translated by R. Sakai. In John Whitney Hall and Toyoda Takeshi, eds., Japan in theMuromachi Age, 159-178. Berkeley, CA.
Tani M. 1971. “A Study on Horse Administration in the Ming Period.” Acta Asiatica 21: 73-98.
Taylor, R. 1969. “The Yüan Origins of the Wei-so System.” In C. Hucker, ed., Chinese Government in Ming Times: Seven Studies, 23-40. New York.
Taylor, R. 1998. “Official Religion in the Ming.” In F Mote and D. Twitchett, eds., Cambridge History of China, Vol. 8: The Ming Dynasty, 1368-1644, Part 2, 840-892. Cambridge.
Tong, J. 1991. Disorder under Heaven: Collective Violence in the Ming Dynasty. Stanford, CA.
Tsai, H. 2001. Perpetual Happiness: The Ming Emperor Yongle. Seattle, WA.
Veit, V 2009. “The Eastern Steppe: Mongol Regimes after the Yuan (1368-1636).” In N. di Cosmo, A. Frank, and P. Golden, eds., The Cambridge History of Inner Asia: The Chinggisid Age, 157181. Cambridge.
Wade, G. 2005. “The Zheng He Voyages: A Reassessment.” Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society 78, no. 1: 37-58.
Wade, G. 2008. “Engaging the South: Ming China and Southeast Asia in the Fifteenth Century.” Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 51: 578-638.
Wakeman, F. 1979. “The Shun interregnum of 1644.” In J. Spence and J. Wills, eds., From Ming to Ch’ing: Conquest, Region, and Continuity in Seventeenth Century China, 39-87. New Haven, CT.
Wakeman, F. 1985. The Great Enterprise: The Manchu Reconstruction of Imperial Order in Seventeenth-Century China. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA.
Waldron, A. 1990. The Great Wall of China. Cambridge.
Wang G.-w. 1968. “Early Ming Relations with Southeast Asia: A Background Essay.” In J. K. Fairbank, ed., The Chinese World Order: Traditional China’s Foreign Relations, 34-62. Cambridge.
Wang G.-w. 1990. “Merchants Without Empire: The Hokkien Sojourning Communities.” In J. Tracey, ed., The Rise of Merchant Empires: Long-Distance Trade in the Early Modern World, 400-421. Cambridge.
Wang G.-w. 1998. “Ming Foreign Relations: Southeast Asia.” In F. Mote and D. Twitchett, eds., Cambridge History of China, Vol. 8, The MingDynasty, 1368-1644, Part2, 301-332. Cambridge.
Wang, R. 2012. The Ming Prince and Daoism: Institutional Patronage of an Elite. London and New York.
Wang Y.-t'. 1953. Official Relations between China and Japan 1368-1549. Cambridge.
Wang Y.-q. 1986. “Some Salient Features of the Ming Labor Service System.” Ming Studies 21:1-44.
Wang, Y.-K. 2011. Harmony and War: Confucian Culture and Chinese Power Politics. New York. Whitmore, J. 1985. Vietnam, Ho Quy Ly, and the Ming (1371-1421). New Haven, CT.
Wills, J. 1979. “Maritime China from Wang Chih to Shi Lang: Themes in Peripheral History.” In J. Spence and J. Wills, eds., From Ming to Ch’ing: Conquest, Region, and Continuity in Seventeenth Century China, 204-238. New Haven, CT.
Wills, J. 1998. “Relations with Maritime Europeans, 1514-1662.” In F. Mote and D. Twitchett, eds., Cambridge History of China, Vol. 8, The MingDynasty, 1368-1644, Part2, 333-375. Cambridge.
Wills, J, ed. 2011. China and Maritime Europe, 1500-1800. Cambridge.
Woodside, A. 2007. “The Centre and the Borderlands in Chinese Political Theory.” In D. Lary, ed., The Chinese State at the Borders, 11-28. Vancouver and Toronto.
Zürcher, E.-J. 2013. “Introduction.” In Erik-Jan Zürcher, ed., Fighting for a Living: A Comparative History of Military Labour 1500-2000, 11-41. Amsterdam.
More on the topic Assessing the Ming Empire:
- 19 The Ming Empire
- Warfare in the Ming-Qing Context
- The Ming Dynasty, 1368-1644
- ‘Illicit Sex', Coercion and Consent in Ming-Qing Law
- Sara Warren Xian-Ming Chen Nicholas F. LaRusso Andrew D. Badley
- Assessing the Eardrum
- Assessing the Ear Canals
- Assessing the Determinants of the Hong Kong Discount
- ASSESSING THE PERFORMANCE OF SAVING FOR CHANGE IN MALI
- Assessing Vaccine Efficacy in Different Animal Models
- Questions for assessing recent influential theory
- Quantifying Violence: Assessing the Prevalence of Trauma
- Chapter 68 Assessing the Maturity of Control Objectives for Information and Related Technology (COBIT) Framework in the Egyptian Banking Sector
- The Achaemenid Persian Empire was something new in history: a hyper-power without serious rival, a world empire on an unprecedented scale.
- Musculoskeletal pain in children is variable. Depending on age and verbal and cognitive abilities, assessing pain in the pediatric patient may present additional challenges.
- An overseas empire gained is not necessarily an empire retained.
- Allianz Research. Country Risk Atlas 2024: Assessing non-payment risk in major economies. Allianz,2024. — 179 p., 2024
- Historians have traditionally regarded the Ottoman Empire's failed second siege of Vienna in 1683 as a turning point in the empire's long history, bringing to an end centuries of military success and expansion.
- Roman law entered medieval political reflection in the late eleventh century as the law of the universal Roman empire, an organization foretold by Old Testament prophecy as the last empire to rule the world before Apocalypse and hallowed by Christ himself who had lived under the Caesars.