<<
>>

The empire of Charles V and Philip II was one of the largest and most powerful of all time.

Spanning four continents, it was a successor to not only the Roman Empire, but also the bulwark of Catholicism—the Holy Roman Empire. The breadth of its interests rivaled the other great powers of its time—the Ottomans, for instance, as well as the states of northern Europe.

Even after the death of Emperor Charles V led to the division of Habsburg possessions, the Hispanic monarchy remained one of the largest political powers of the time, covering much of continental America (excepting Portuguese Brazil), the largest islands in the Caribbean (Cuba, Santo Domingo, and Puerto Rico) and the Philippines. Up until its collapse at the begin­ning of the nineteenth century, the empire remained a strong power in the South Atlantic and the Pacific thanks to the connection between Acapulco (in present-day Mexico) and the Philippine Archipelago. For a time (1580-1640), it even added to its extraordinary territory when Philip II acquired the throne of Portugal, along with its imperial possessions on three continents, including the Canary Islands, some entrepots down the north and the west coast of Africa, as well as the Philippines. The real end of the greater Spanish Empire only came when its American conti­nental possessions broke ties with its European metropole between 1820 and 1824.

All empires result either from dynastic consolidation or from colonial conquests and expansion. Granting this, Spain was remarkable in its capacity to engage in both simultaneously. In this sense, the Hispanic monarchy constituted a formi­dable example of a composite state (a concept developed by Helmut Koenigsberger and John Elliott), and at the same time, a great engineer of colonial societies in the New World and the Philippines.1 In this chapter, we describe the interplay between these two aspects, explaining overall change within the context of the challenges facing the empire at any given time. These included both the globali­zation of trading networks of precious metals and goods, as well as the religious­political conflict that pitted, on one hand, northern and southern Europe against one another and, on the other hand, Christian Europe against the great Muslim powers of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries.

It is important to note the fragile underpinnings upon which the dominions of the Habsburg dynasty were built in

1 Koenigsberger 1986; Elliott 1992.

Josep M. Delgado and Josep M. Fradera, The Habsburg Monarchy and the Spanish Empire (1492-1757) In: The Oxford World History of Empire. Edited by: Peter Fibiger Bang, C.A. Bayly, Walter Scheidel, Oxford University Press (2021). © Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197532768.003.0028. the time of Charles V. The emperor's authority was not universally accepted by the great powers of the time: neither by England, France, and the Pope, on one side, nor the rising Ottomans, on the other. The first mentioned, for instance, backed the re­volt of the United Provinces (the root cause of the financial bankruptcy and military exhaustion of the Spanish Habsburgs, as shown by historians Ramon Carande and Geoffrey Parker[1952]) and the extension of the Protestant dissidence all across Europe. The Turks made serious inroads into North Africa and stopped the Christian power in the Battle of Lepanto in 1571.

Our plan in this chapter is to sketch the institutional, political, and economic transformation of the Habsburg Monarchy of the sixteenth century—at that time firmly based in its European dominions—into a colonial and Atlantic empire, based upon the remaining indigenous societies in continental America, the Philippine Islands, and the archipelago extending toward China and Southeast Asia.

<< | >>
Source: Bang Peter F., Bayly C.A., Scheidel Walter (eds.). The Oxford World History of Empire. Volume Two: The History of Empires. Oxford University Press,2020. — 1352 p.. 2020

More on the topic The empire of Charles V and Philip II was one of the largest and most powerful of all time.:

  1. The Inca Empire was the last and most powerful indigenous state to develop in the Americas (Map 25.1).
  2. The Ptolemaic and Seleucid empires are the two largest and longest-lasting terri­torial states that emerged from Alexander’s conquest of the Persian Empire.
  3. Philip and His Son
  4. The concept of “empire” has long proven notoriously difficult to pin down, partly due to a steady accumulation of ideological baggage over time, but also because of the improbable range of historical phenomena
  5. From the time of the acceptance of Christianity by the Roman Empire in the fourth century and through the subsequent spread of this faith throughout the European continent, the interrelatedness of politics and religion had been a fun­damental component of the development of western civilization.
  6. Nicholas Light and Philip Fernbach
  7. Allan Philip. The New School of Economics: The Platform and Theory Behind the New Physiocrats. Philip Allan Books,2018. — 132 p., 2018
  8. The Largest Ecological Experiment on Earth: A Case Study
  9. EDUCATING CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER ON ISLAM—AGAIN
  10. THE STANDARD VIEW: POWERFUL STATES AS SOURCES OF INTERNATIONAL PROBLEMS
  11. MAZEPA S CONTACTS WITH LESZCZYNSKI AND CHARLES XII
  12. Share of the Largest Banks in the United States and Other Countries
  13. Charles V. Trappey