<<
>>

The Year 1898: The Empire’s Shadow

In 1898 Spain definitively lost its last colonial possessions in America and Asia. If the defeats of 1824 meant it was now a second-rank Empire in retreat, the defeat of 1898 and the Treaty of Paris with the United States that same year was even worse, placing Spain behind even the other Iberian imperialist, Portugal.

But though Spain lost its last colonial possessions, memories of the long imperial tradition lasted throughout the twentieth century, part of an imaginary, rhetorical international po­sition that no longer corresponded to the country's economic, demographic, or po­litical capacities. If only for that reason, the long shadow of the empire deserves to be explored in several relevant aspects.

First was Spain's growing interest in Africa, which had existed since the Middle Ages. In the eighteenth century Spain's commitments deepened after changes in Ottoman policy brought about more peaceful commercial and diplomatic relations in the eastern Mediterranean. As a result, the import of Russian grains from the Black Sea ports of Odessa and Rostock took on great importance for the peninsular periphery, which grew accustomed to receiving imports. Morocco's role changed as the result of repeated subsistence crises in Spain, where domestic markets were still not well integrated. As a result, in the 1790s the state considered the possibility of establishing some sort of protectorate in Morocco. That line of thinking continued through 1859-1860, when the first war against the Alaouite kingdom took place, and into the twentieth century, when Spain established protectorates there in 1912 after reaching an agreement with France. After years of warfare, an administrative structure for these territorial claims was established in 1927 which lasted until 1956, when the entire country was decolonized.

The establishment of areas of interest in northern Morocco (the Rif) and the south (which would become known as the Spanish Sahara) took place at the same time as Spain penetrated the Gulf of Guinea, a remnant of Spain's late entry into slave trafficking.

After signing treaties with Portugal in 1776 and 1778, Spain entered Fernando Poo (Bioko), the Guinean coast (Rio Muni, or Mbini), and the islands of Corisco, Elobey, and Annobon. Until the 1850s, these were slaving bases with a highly heterogeneous European population (including British abolitionists in 1827-1843); other economic interests did not appear until the late nineteenth century, which brought colonial coconut oil and cacao businesses, along with no­table missionary activity. Spain's presence in Africa lasted well into the twentieth century; the two Guineas were decolonized in 1968 as a result of international pres­sure and internal distress.

The turn to Africa and the ideology of Hispanism in America in the early twen­tieth century did not only continue older territorial ambitions; it also represented a coherent ideology of continuity. Spain was to continue among the club of nations and “imperial societies,” to use Christophe Charle's term. There is no better example than its desperate effort to hold on to its three colonial enclaves in 1898, including a major military mobilization involving 500,000 soldiers and volunteers at a time when Spain had 18 million inhabitants. The mobilization showed something that previously could be seen only imperfectly: the mature relations between empire and nation. If Cuba's demand for home rule brushed up against the rigid identifi­cation of the modern nation and the unitary institutional framework consolidated within the liberal state, then the Filipino demand for reforms revealed the very narrow limits in the state's flexibility. Once military and political efforts to keep the colonies failed in the face of Antillean and Filipino nationalism and US expansion, the debate concerning the state answer to the regional demands of home rule also failed to give birth to any kind of liberal consensus. These two failures gave birth to Basque and Catalonian nationalism. Basques and Catalonians wanted not just a Europeanized version of Cuba and Canada self-government for their regions, but they also wanted the state to retain its imperial ambitions, however modest, and thus maintain membership among the world's leading nations.[2317] Spanish nation­alism in the twentieth century once again became confused with imperial ideals, rhetorical and effective, weak and aggressive.

Seen from another perspective, Spain's twentieth-century Africanism closed the ideological circle of the old empire, tying an even more sinister knot. Militarist and exploitative of local labor, it attacked an­ything that appeared to threaten disaggregation of the internal order, particularly

social demands by unions and the real or imaginary challenges posed by regional nationalism.39 In that sense, the tradition that emerged from the wreckage of the late empire was reborn in the odd ideals of the victors of the Spanish Civil War of 1936-1939.

Bibliography

Balfour, S. 2002. Deadly Embrace: Morocco and the Road to Spanish Civil War. Oxford.

Barbier, J., and H. Klein. 1981. “Revolutionary Wars and Public Finances: The Madrid Treasury, 1784-1804.” Journal of Economic History 41, no. 2: 315-339.

Barbier, J., and H. Klein. 1985. “Las prioridades de un monarca ilustrado: el gasto publico bajo el reinado de Carlos III.” Revista de Historia Economica 3:473-495.

Bergad, L. W, F. Iglesias Garcia, and M. del Carmen Barcia. 1995. The Cuban Slave Market, 1790­1880. Cambridge.

Blanco, J. D. 2009. Frontier Constitutions: Christianity and Colonial Empire in the Nineteenth­Century Philippines. Berkeley, CA.

Brown, M., and G. Paquette, eds. 2013. Connections after Colonialism: Europe and Latin America in the 1820s. Tuscaloosa, AL.

Burkholder, M. A., and D. S. Chandler. 1977. From Impotence to Authority: The Spanish Crown and the American Audiencias, 1687-1808. Columbia, MO.

Canny, N., and A. Pagden, eds. 1987. Colonial Identity in the Atlantic World, 1500-1800. Princeton. Casanovas, J. 1998. Bread, or Bullets! Urban Labor and Spanish Colonialism in Cuba, 1850-1898.

Pittsburgh.

Costeloe, M. P. 1986. Response to Revolution: Imperial Spain and the Spanish American Revolutions, 1810-1840. Cambridge.

Deans-Smith, S. 1992. Bureaucrats, Planters, and Workers: The Making of the Tobacco Monopoly in Bourbon Mexico. Austin, TX.

Delgado Ribas, J.

M. 2007. Dinamicas imperiales (1650-1796): Espana, America y Europa en el cambio institucional del sistema colonial espanol. Barcelona.

Drescher, S. 2009. Abolition: A History of Slavery and Antislavery. Cambridge.

Elliott, J. H. 2006. Empires of the Atlantic World: Britain and Spain in America, 1492-1830. New Haven, CT.

Ferrer, A. 1999. Insurgent Cuba: Race, Nation, and Revolution, 1868-1898. Chapel Hill, NC. Fradera, J. M. 2005. Coloniaspara despues de un imperio. Barcelona.

Fuente, A. de la. 2000. Una nacion para todos. Raza, desigualdad y politica en Cuba. 1900-2000. Madrid.

Jesus, E. de. 1980. The Tobacco Monopoly in the Philippines: Bureaucratic Enterprise and Social Change, 1766-1880. Quezon City.

Iglesias Garcia, F. 1999. Del Ingenio al Central. Havana.

Ileto, R. C. 1998. Filipinos and Their Revolution: Event, Discourse, and Historiography. Quezon City. Klein, H. S. 1994. Las finanzas americanas del imperio espanol, 1680-1809. Mexico City.

Knight, F. 1970. Slave Society in Cuba during the Nineteenth Century. Madison, WI.

Kramer, P. A. 2006. The Blood of Government: Race, Empire, the United States and the Philippines. Chapel Hill.

Kuethe, A. J. 1978. Military Reform and Society in New Granada, 1773-1808. Gainesville.

Larkin, J. A. 1993. Sugar and the Origins of Modern Philippine Society. Berkeley, CA.

Legarda, B., Jr. 1999. After the Galleons: Foreign Trade and Entrepreneurship in the Nineteenth­Century Philippines. Quezon City.

Maluquer de Motes, J. 1992. Nacion e inmigracion: Los espanoles en Cuba (ss. XIXy XX). Oviedo.

Marichal, C. 1981. La bancarrota del Virreinato: Nueva Espana y las finanzas del imperio espanol, 1780-1810. Mexico City.

Marichal, C., and J. von Grafenstein, eds. 2012. El secreto del imperio espanol: Los situados coloniales en el siglo XVIII. Mexico City.

Martinez, M. E. 2010. Genealogical Fictions: Limpieza de sangre, Religion and Gender in Colonial Mexico. Stanford, CA.

Moreno Fraginals, M.

1987. El ingenio: Complejo economico social cubano del azucar, 3 vols. Havana.

Murray, D. 1980. Odious Commerce: Britain, Spain and the Abolition of the Cuban Slave Trade. Cambridge.

Owen, N. G. 1984. Prosperity without Progress: Manila Hemp and Material Life in the Colonial Philippines. Berkeley, CA.

Phelan, J. L. 1987. “Authority and Flexibility in the Spanish Imperial Bureaucracy.” Administrative Science Quarterly 92: 531-562.

Portillo Valdes, J. M. 2005. Crisis atläntica: Autonomia e independencia en la crisis de la monarquia hispana. Madrid.

Rodriguez J. E. 1996. La independencia de la America espanola. Mexico City.

Roldan de Montaud, I. 2000. La restauracion en Cuba: El fracaso de un proceso reformista. Madrid. Sanchez-Albornoz, N. 1988. Espanoles hacia America: La emigration en masa, 1880-1930. Madrid. Scarano, F. A. 1984. Sugar and Slavery in Puerto Rico: The Plantation Economy of Ponce, 1800-1850.

Madison, WI.

Scott, R. J. 1985. Slave Emancipation in Cuba: The Transition to Free Labor, 1860-1899. Princeton, NJ.

Stein, S. J., and B. H. Stein. 2003. Apogee of Empire: Spain and New Spain in the Age of Charles III, 1759-1789. Baltimore, MD.

Stolcke, V 1974. Marriage, Class and Colour in Nineteenth-Century Cuba: A Study of Racial Attitudes and Sexual Values in a Slave Society. Cambridge.

Ucelay-Da Cal, E. 2003. El imperialismo catalän: Prat de la Riba, Cambo, D’Ors y la conquista moral de Espana. Barcelona.

Weber, D. J. 2005. Bärbaros: Spaniards and Their Savages in the Age of Enlightenment. New Haven, CT. Yanez Gallardo, C. 1994. La emigration de espanoles a America (siglos XIX y XX): Dimension y caracteristicas cuantitativas. Colombres.

<< | >>
Source: Bang Peter F., Bayly C.A., Scheidel Walter (eds.). The Oxford World History of Empire. Volume Two: The History of Empires. Oxford University Press,2020. — 1352 p.. 2020

More on the topic The Year 1898: The Empire’s Shadow:

  1. 1931 - a year of change in the British Empire?
  2. The wedding ceremony of the sea, celebrated each year on Ascension Day in Venice, reminds us of the first important naval campaign that the Venetians undertook, in the year 1000,
  3. Reform and Crisis (1762-1898)
  4. The Shadow Ideology
  5. Article 10.3 Terms laid down for taming shadow bank risk
  6. The Mongols’ Shadow­
  7. The effects of shadow banking on banks' credit consumers
  8. Widening and deepening in the shadow of the Cold War
  9. in the shadow of the shtetl
  10. The Long Shadow of 'Uncle Joe'
  11. The Liturgical Year
  12. Religious Observances Throughout the Year
  13. The Islamic Year and Holidays
  14. A TYPICAL ONE-YEAR PROJECTION
  15. NEW YEAR IN KIEV
  16. How can one evaluate President Zelensky’s first year in power?
  17. (The rulers) maintain their hold over the government and their own dy­nasty with the help, then, either of clients and followers who grew up in the shadow and power of group feeling,
  18. PART NINE The Interwar Year
  19. PART NINE The Interwar Year
  20. Veidlinger Jeffrey. In the shadow of the shtetl: small-town Jewish life in Soviet Ukraine. Bloomington: Indiana University Press,2013. — 424 p., 2013